edIT 6 Posted June 14, 2014 There's already a pooping animation in the game, so we'll probably see it come. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingofTheWorld 44 Posted June 14, 2014 IF some people will leave game cause of pooping just leave them man... For realism of course pooping, pissing, vomitting should be in fckıng gameee, whats wrong with peoples man !!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shrub Rocketeer ™ 879 Posted June 14, 2014 I want pooping in the game because #1 nobody ever doing before #2 is realism #3 I want to find a player doing so I can kill him easier #4 it make new tactic decisions for example do I g to the city and find a new backpack or do I go first to the forest for a shit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil Minion 943 Posted June 14, 2014 Before they add pooping they should add nudity and (limited) gore - because the same arguments apply here. Having a game where you can take a shit but don't suffer visible wounds and can't go clothless (despite having clothing options otherwise) is a little stupid. To make it clear: I am not talking about sex or splatter-like gibs (though libido might also make for an interesting game mechanic). So for me: Pooping only if they also add wounds and nudity (if we want it realistic) otherwise no pooping please (if we want to keep it a normal game). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheWanderingMan 170 Posted June 14, 2014 As long as there are variations in poo according to diet etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
infiltrator 275 Posted June 14, 2014 Yes the more realism the better. The poop itself could be good for crafting. poop filled booby traps, poop tipped arrows, poop tipped .22lr rounds.In medieval japan ninjas often left their shouriken tips in animal feces so they would rust and be able to transmit tetanus reliably. Poop tipped arrows aren't far off ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hikurac 115 Posted June 14, 2014 Lmao i'm all for realism and immersion. However if a "feature" can't be implemented correctly into DayZ, then it shouldn't be implemented at all, and this is a prime example. :lol: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JPWiser 251 Posted June 14, 2014 No, you have to draw the line somewhere and can easily replicate the disease stuff in other ways Just wrong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katana67 2907 Posted June 14, 2014 While I've become disinterested in this potential inclusion, people really haven't come to the table with anything but grossouts, "hurdurrealismsucks," and vitriol. Stop thinking of it as a thing born out of realism, and stop being so put off by your silly taboos. Everybody poops. Think of it as an additional vector for disease. Sure, there are "better" ways of doing it (i.e. lugging a rotting animal into a pond) but I want there to be multiple methods of inducing disease. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xalienax 621 Posted June 14, 2014 While I've become disinterested in this potential inclusion, people really haven't come to the table with anything but grossouts, "hurdurrealismsucks," and vitriol. Stop thinking of it as a thing born out of realism, and stop being so put off by your silly taboos. Everybody poops. Think of it as an additional vector for disease. Sure, there are "better" ways of doing it (i.e. lugging a rotting animal into a pond) but I want there to be multiple methods of inducing disease.pretty much this. the inclusion, nor non-inclusion of this feature makes no difference so long as the health and nutrition system is deep and well diversified. im sure they could (as you pointed out) find less "taboo" ways of adressing it but what ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kaboki 62 Posted June 14, 2014 I want pooping in the game because #1 nobody ever doing before #2 is realism #3 I want to find a player doing so I can kill him easier #4 it make new tactic decisions for example do I g to the city and find a new backpack or do I go first to the forest for a shit? #5 So you and Machete Master can take a shit together :lol: (sorry couldn't resist) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daemonkid 493 Posted June 14, 2014 Jesus this thread is still going? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buffaloe 87 Posted June 14, 2014 Jesus this thread is still going? As long as there is life on earth there also will be poop! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 14, 2014 As long as there is life on earth there also will be poop! On that note I must go poop. Steel cut oats daily = pooping 3 times a day like clockwork. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cpo1bishop 44 Posted June 14, 2014 I think that would be taking this shit to far Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BadAsh (DayZ) 1513 Posted June 15, 2014 (edited) Before they add pooping they should add nudity and (limited) gore - because the same arguments apply here. Having a game where you can take a shit but don't suffer visible wounds and can't go clothless (despite having clothing options otherwise) is a little stupid. To make it clear: I am not talking about sex or splatter-like gibs (though libido might also make for an interesting game mechanic). So for me: Pooping only if they also add wounds and nudity (if we want it realistic) otherwise no pooping please (if we want to keep it a normal game). Can you elaborate on why you think the want of one feature should automatically exclude the other? Personally I say bring on all those features you mention, but I am curious to know why you are so adamant in thinking it is all of them or none of them, or more precisely why you think pooping to be such a big problem that you think such other features should be added before that. Edited June 15, 2014 by BadAsh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathlove 2286 Posted June 15, 2014 (edited) Can you elaborate on why you think the want of one feature should automatically exclude the other? Personally I say bring on all those features you mention, but I am curious to know why you are so adamant in thinking it is all of them or none of them, or more precisely why you think pooping to be such a big problem that you think such other features should be added before that.Well im sure it has to do with having to stare at your character and not really wanting to see it graphically unfold before your eyes. If they just added a message, cut away black out scene than an im done kind of message that should be enough. Not to realistic but not to unrealistic ether. Same thing with gore doesn't have to be fountains but blood in correct hit spots and rag doll decapitations and severed arms and legs for heavy melee like axes with full stamina, strength and health for the person wielding the weapon. Edited June 15, 2014 by Deathlove 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pycco 38 Posted June 15, 2014 i would rather have gore than pooping, its poop it's not really special in any way.(everything poops) the effects it could have on the game are minimal imo. polluting water with poop? that's the big omg its so important aspect is just silly, it's poop i think they should focus on more important things other than pooping. what will we have messages like I need to poop?childish imo and would take away from the time they could use to add better features to the game. like gore and blood, guts, dismemberment, traps, dead body's that stay where the fall unless moved the list goes on and on. pooping is just a silly in a video game imo. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Caboose187 (DayZ) 3036 Posted June 15, 2014 Ya, I want pooping long before any actual survival is implemented :rolleyes: We are still getting survival, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 15, 2014 Ya, I want pooping long before any actual survival is implemented :rolleyes: We are still getting survival, right? No reason why it cant be added. Just means more time to fine tune it for when survival and disease is a factor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buffaloe 87 Posted June 15, 2014 Well im sure it has to do with having to stare at your character and not really wanting to see it graphically unfold before your eyes. If they just added a message, cut away black out scene than an im done kind of message that should be enough. Not to realistic but not to unrealistic ether. Same thing with gore doesn't have to be fountains but blood in correct hit spots and rag doll decapitations and severed arms and legs for heavy melee like axes with full stamina, strength and health for the person wielding the weapon. I still don't get why watching a game character engaged in a pooping animation is a problem, while chopping someone's arm of with an axe is fine.I personally always considered poop less shocking than grievous bodily harm... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
General Zod 1118 Posted June 15, 2014 Urinating into canteen for someone to find would be hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
liquidsnake 275 Posted June 15, 2014 Urinating into canteen for someone to find would be hilarious. You can drink urine, no problem. Actually, one of my friends accidentally drank his brother's urine, which was in a soda bottle for the doctor. He said "What's this? It's really tasty!", so urine apparently isn't only harmless and a good hydrator, but also very tasty :lol: OT: I see little reason to add it. Just for contaminating water and poop tipping arrows? IMO, that's not enough reason to add something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
General Zod 1118 Posted June 15, 2014 You can drink urine, no problem. Actually, one of my friends accidentally drank his brother's urine, which was in a soda bottle for the doctor. He said "What's this? It's really tasty!", so urine apparently isn't only harmless and a good hydrator, but also very tasty :lol: 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathlove 2286 Posted June 15, 2014 You can drink urine, no problem. Actually, one of my friends accidentally drank his brother's urine, which was in a soda bottle for the doctor. He said "What's this? It's really tasty!", so urine apparently isn't only harmless and a good hydrator, but also very tasty :lol:I want you to say that EXACT same thing the next time you go in for a job interview on your resume and let me know how that turns out for you...... LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites