crazyandlazy 376 Posted January 5, 2014 Seeing a lot of people being kicked. Saw one or two that go ban with #12323 (number). Are these hackers in the aplha? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frosti 2165 Posted January 5, 2014 Most likely yes. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
preacherlr 614 Posted January 5, 2014 The #123323 Is a section of their GUID. that means they are now permabanned. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papapur 1 Posted January 5, 2014 This is Wallhack or AIM bot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DropBearChick 1216 Posted January 5, 2014 its cause of antihack, u see dean clever man, he release alpha for hackers to enjoy for 2 week make them all cozey and settled in then in update without warning puts in battle eye all banned and us people free of there cruel grasp :) 40 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frosti 2165 Posted January 5, 2014 its cause of antihack, u see dean clever man, he release alpha for hackers to enjoy for 2 week make them all cozey and settled in then in update without warning puts in battle eye all banned and us people free of there cruel grasp :) Let it snow. 13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
autoloon 285 Posted January 5, 2014 You have to be willing to part with some cheese to catch mouse. 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
humberto 5 Posted January 5, 2014 (edited) its cause of antihack, u see dean clever man, he release alpha for hackers to enjoy for 2 week make them all cozey and settled in then in update without warning puts in battle eye all banned and us people free of there cruel grasp :)I was under the impression, valve steam anti hack was the only one who had the autoritizy to ban customers. more over, not everyone in jail is guilty, the same principle could apply to someone caught in lag, and being convicted and sentenced to a ban, because battle eye thought they were wall hacking... considering the bugs in this "alpha" I believe many innocents will be caught up, and then angry they paid money to support a product only to get banned by the judge and jury, battle eye Edited January 5, 2014 by humberto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DropBearChick 1216 Posted January 5, 2014 I remember on the 12th day of Christmas(standalone) I found a hacker with 2 servants made me play games with him he touched me in places I cant even speak of, he even took my banana, worst day of my life 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OrLoK 16182 Posted January 5, 2014 I was under the impression, valve steam anti hack was the only one who had the autoritizy to ban customers. more over, not everyone in jail is guilty, the same principle could apply to someone caught in lag, and being convicted and sentenced to a ban, because battle eye thought they were wall hacking... considering the bugs in this "alpha" I believe many innocents will be caught up, and then angry they paid money to support a product only to get banned by the judge and jury, battle eyeHello there This is not how BE works. BE is quite a nice little tool. Im glad it's in. Rgds LoK 11 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shadyfizzle 80 Posted January 5, 2014 Gonna sell a few more copies of SA now that some people got banned? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gandolaf 81 Posted January 5, 2014 Out of personal interest,why do many people consider Battleye to be a bad protection? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
humberto 5 Posted January 5, 2014 (edited) Out of personal interest,why do many people consider Battleye to be a bad protection? because it failed HORRIBLY during the mod... if it wasnt for 3rd party anti hacks, dayz mod would be unplayable, because hackers would not be stopped... third party anti hack cost more then the game itself now...., go figure Edited January 5, 2014 by humberto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SAXX0N 28 Posted January 6, 2014 because it failed HORRIBLY during the mod... if it wasnt for 3rd party anti hacks, dayz mod would be unplayable, because hackers would not be stopped... third party anti hack cost more then the game itself now...., go figureJust because something is called battleye you have no idea what the capabilities are of the software. Obviously alot of the new bannies didn't either. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
babypuncher71 22 Posted January 6, 2014 (edited) because it failed HORRIBLY during the mod... if it wasnt for 3rd party anti hacks, dayz mod would be unplayable, because hackers would not be stopped... third party anti hack cost more then the game itself now...., go figure Ummmm no,the problem with the DayZ mod was the whole game allowed scripting was built on it...Most of the things you seen in the mod was scripting nothing more...I wish players would learn the diff between the 2... Edited January 6, 2014 by babypuncher71 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slyguy65 499 Posted January 6, 2014 its cause of antihack, u see dean clever man, he release alpha for hackers to enjoy for 2 week make them all cozey and settled in then in update without warning puts in battle eye all banned and us people free of there cruel grasp :)Im still confused, I thought dayz was VAC anti hack is it both or just battle eye? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ninjacalypse 551 Posted January 6, 2014 Seeing a lot of people being kicked. Saw one or two that go ban with #12323 (number). Are these hackers in the aplha? Yes, there are known hacks for DayZ SA. The DayZ team is fully aware of this and taking steps to address it. There are already many recent threads on known haxxor forums where players are crying about being banzzored. Customer support on those sites that publish game hacks consists of other hackers laughing at you for getting banned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raynor009 204 Posted January 6, 2014 Nah, they were beta testers for hacks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crazyandlazy 376 Posted January 6, 2014 Yes, there are known hacks for DayZ SA. The DayZ team is fully aware of this and taking steps to address it. There are already many recent threads on known haxxor forums where players are crying about being banzzored. Customer support on those sites that publish game hacks consists of other hackers laughing at you for getting banned.lol what a friendly community that must be! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WizzardsCuff 85 Posted January 6, 2014 I remember on the 12th day of Christmas(standalone) I found a hacker with 2 servants made me play games with him he touched me in places I cant even speak of, he even took my banana, worst day of my life Never mind real life.....what happened in the game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fig0451 85 Posted January 6, 2014 (edited) because it failed HORRIBLY during the mod... if it wasnt for 3rd party anti hacks, dayz mod would be unplayable, because hackers would not be stopped... third party anti hack cost more then the game itself now...., go figure The Arma engine, written as a milsim thus not geared toward worrying about exploiters, takes a whole lot of liberties with the whole 'client-server' relationship thing, and works in ways that are basically an exploiter's dream. Note that I say 'exploit' not 'hack' because most 'hacks' are not really hacks, they're just taking advantage of a glaring design defect, as opposed to actually engineering a clever way to get their instruction set completed.In most video games, the server is god, and the client is just a little dude that runs around and asks the server if he can do things, or tells the server that something is happening to him. The server is the boss and decides what is actually going on. In Arma it's nearly the opposite, and the client can often just literally assert that something has happened to it, or that it is currently interacting with something, therefore it must exist, therefore it exists for everyone. The architecture is just vastly different, as I understand it, this is part of the reason the game is able to be as vast as it is. Honestly, probably most of what the dev team spent their time on last year was recoding the entire engine to be more secure/traditional while keeping as much of the large scale functionality as possible. Edited January 6, 2014 by fig0451 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crazyandlazy 376 Posted January 6, 2014 http://steamcommunity.com/app/221100/discussions/1/648814845364427758/ leaving this here for the lols 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djporternz 644 Posted January 6, 2014 I was under the impression, valve steam anti hack was the only one who had the autoritizy to ban customers. more over, not everyone in jail is guilty, the same principle could apply to someone caught in lag, and being convicted and sentenced to a ban, because battle eye thought they were wall hacking... considering the bugs in this "alpha" I believe many innocents will be caught up, and then angry they paid money to support a product only to get banned by the judge and jury, battle eyeNo. Read up on how they actually work. BE isn't going to ban you for rubber-banding or being teleported through a wall due to lag. It's a very thorough and mature system. If you get banned by it, then you can be sure that you got off lightly. So, kids: Don't cheat. Stay in school, and drugs are bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djporternz 644 Posted January 6, 2014 http://steamcommunity.com/app/221100/discussions/1/648814845364427758/ leaving this here for the lolsLOL 'Yes, Sir. I was bad. But i didn't think I'd have to take responsibility for my own actions. That's just not fair!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
floj 393 Posted January 6, 2014 http://steamcommunity.com/app/221100/discussions/1/648814845364427758/ leaving this here for the lols http://steamcommunity.com/id/brokenh3art/recommended/221100/ Gonna be so big, shame you won't be there with us big guy worolololol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
