Next Vehicle

[B4GEL 175]

[Moula307 0]

Landrover please.

 

 

Pick up truck of course. Ol Toyota pick up

 

 

Land Rover Defender!

 

Oh no wait....were in the Armaverse.....Hand Over Offender plz :)

 

Dat one :)

I agree, we need a civilian type of rugged truck/suv. Although I wouldn't expect to find any kind of American-made Jeeps in Chenarus. If you look overseas, specifically in Europe, most rugged expedition style vehicles you find are Land Rovers or Toyotas. A pickup would have great utility and cargo space, a 4 seater SUV would be perfect for hauling a small group. 

My personal suggestions would be an old, dented, beat up, rusty Toyota Pickup/Hilux or Landcruiser. I also agree with the person who suggested the vehicles should have mismatched paint. White body with a blue hood, mismatched doors, a gray fender is realistic. Devs could also offer more spraypaint colors allowing us to spraypaint each panel to match the paint.

[Cap'n (DayZ) 1827]

 Slava Ukraina!

[Bororm 1156]

Please tell me the rideable llama thing is a throwback to UO because <3

 

I do think in terms of development purposes, either horses/boats/helicopters/planes should be next.  As any one of those will behave much differently than a wheeled vehicle.  I don't see a whole lot of purpose to introducing another car at the moment, and to a lesser extent a bike/motorcycle/quad.  These are all things I want in of course, but as they have demonstrated they like to try to do the most complex version of something first to establish a baseline for things to follow.

 

I'd be fine with air vehicles coming last, as they offer the most end game of transportation, but I do think it would be valuable to start with something like mounts or boats next.

Edited November 26, 2014 by Bororm

[rybec 339]

HILUX I want some pickups.

[cu3b4ll 2]

Any Toyota/Land Rover would be awesome. Seems the more realistic approach. If/When they add any heavier military hardware, I'd like to be able to mount(with the right parts of course) a PKM/RPK/DShK on the back of a pick up.

[ob1korobi 125]

Honestly the Rumpo from GTA III would be my first pick. No windows of course.

 

[umberfive 89]

Considering those wrecks everywhere, something like that. Those small offroads, transporters, maybe buses and those civilian/police cars from the seventies. And of course motor bikes for those many bike helmets.

[Weyland Yutani (DayZ) 1159]

SKODA - GREEN

[Heatofbattle 49]

Imagine driving a police car through the streets of Chernogorsk, sirens blazing, giving tickets to freshspawns, dodging bandit snipers... It's too beautiful for-BAM...You are dead.

[hannibaldaplaya 1095]

 

Let us ride in style.

[theevancat 94]

I want motorcycles. That'd be awesome to have one of those swaggy Soviet military bikes.

[hyerjohn 5]

I'd want bikes, ATVs, motorbikes, stuff like that. A lot more feasible that they would be around. But whenever vehicles get added, and baricading, you can see where I'm going:

[Jex 1104]

Please be a skoda....

 

 

They need to add at least one iconic car from the mod :)

 

 

oh, and this.....

 

Edited November 26, 2014 by Jexter

[ob1korobi 125]

changed vote to llamas

[hombrecz 832]

Land Rover Defender!

 

Oh no wait....were in the Armaverse.....Hand Over Offender plz :)

 

Dat one :)

 

Wasn't that one pretty lame on grass though?

I remember these being far superior.

 

[DemonGroover 8836]

The classic Aussie Holden shaggin' wagon!

 

 

 

[Karmaterror 982]

Wasn't that one pretty lame on grass though?

I remember these being far superior.

 

 

Yep the, maybe poorly named, "offroad" wasn't quite as good as the UAZ. A friend has an ex mill landy for offroading, and we have had some great fun in it so they will always be my fave.....but lets have both! :)

 

UAZ was a slightly smaller target aswell lol

[hombrecz 832]

Yep the, maybe poorly named, "offroad" wasn't quite as good as the UAZ. A friend has an ex mill landy for offroading, and we have had some great fun in it so they will always be my fave.....but lets have both!  :)

 

UAZ was a slightly smaller target aswell lol

 

I damn loved the camo'ed UAZ. But I also liked "Offenders" and wished for them to be atleast as fast as UAZ on many occasions.

But yes, both should be implemented. They are classy!

[Bonappetit 117]

Voted for horses. No need for fuel, quite and if you ever find yourself dieing of starvation, well... perhaps eat it :)

[Whyherro123 2283]

Voted for horses. No need for fuel, quite and if you ever find yourself dieing of starvation, well... perhaps eat it :)

Have you ever ridden a horse?

 

In order to actually have a horse undertake serious work (AKA carry a rider, as well as tackle and bridle, etc), they need to be fed a diet concentrated in energy; oats, wheat, corn, etc. Not just grass. You also need to be trained in how to ride them, how to have them maneuver across different types of terrain, how to maintain the tack, how to recognize when they are injured, etc etc etc.

 

Horses are HORRIBLE for survival travel. In all seriousness, you are better off using a bicycle, either pedal or motor-powered. They are common, efficient, easy to repair (take parts from other cycles), easy to fuel ( AKA YOU, or scavenged gas or diesel, or jury rig an ethanol-diesel engine, which is stupid-easy), and easy to ride.

 

We invented motors and interchangeable parts for a REASON, folks. One of them is the fact that motors are more efficient for the long haul. Most outdoorsy folk around where I live use ATV's, dirtbikes, etc, rather than horses. And the landscape of Chernarus, with the exception of the open plains near Vybor, are unsuitable for horses, and these plains were probably for cattle than horses.

 

I'll just leave this here:

 

"You cannot gallop them for hours. They’ll collapse. The best way to make time in the saddle is to alternate paces, and have a remount or two trailing behind, and allow the animals reasonable rest. Don’t let your steed eat or drink indiscriminately; it’s likely to bloat and become helpless. In fact, it’s a rather fragile creature, requiring close attention—for example, rubdowns after hard exertion—if it isn’t to fall sick and perhaps die on you. It’s also lazy, stupid, and sometimes malicious."

—Poul Anderson, On Thud and Blunder

[barnabus 1708]

None of the above. I'd like a UAZ jeep.

[Bonappetit 117]

Have you ever ridden a horse?

In order to actually have a horse undertake serious work (AKA carry a rider, as well as tackle and bridle, etc), they need to be fed a diet concentrated in energy; oats, wheat, corn, etc. Not just grass. You also need to be trained in how to ride them, how to have them maneuver across different types of terrain, how to maintain the tack, how to recognize when they are injured, etc etc etc.

Horses are HORRIBLE for survival travel. In all seriousness, you are better off using a bicycle, either pedal or motor-powered. They are common, efficient, easy to repair (take parts from other cycles), easy to fuel ( AKA YOU, or scavenged gas or diesel, or jury rig an ethanol-diesel engine, which is stupid-easy), and easy to ride.

We invented motors and interchangeable parts for a REASON, folks. One of them is the fact that motors are more efficient for the long haul. Most outdoorsy folk around where I live use ATV's, dirtbikes, etc, rather than horses. And the landscape of Chernarus, with the exception of the open plains near Vybor, are unsuitable for horses, and these plains were probably for cattle than horses.

I'll just leave this here:

"You cannot gallop them for hours. They’ll collapse. The best way to make time in the saddle is to alternate paces, and have a remount or two trailing behind, and allow the animals reasonable rest. Don’t let your steed eat or drink indiscriminately; it’s likely to bloat and become helpless. In fact, it’s a rather fragile creature, requiring close attention—for example, rubdowns after hard exertion—if it isn’t to fall sick and perhaps die on you. It’s also lazy, stupid, and sometimes malicious."

—Poul Anderson, On Thud and Blunder

While I agree with you I doubt they would go way over with realism that half of these mentioned problems wouldn't matter ingame, thats the reason I voted for them.

[Whyherro123 2283]

While I agree with you I doubt they would go way over with realism that half of these mentioned problems wouldn't matter ingame, thats the reason I voted for them.

They should. This is a game that prides itself on "realism" when possible, and "authenticity" when not.

[janusz.pietraczuk@gmail.com 138]

How about the immortal... YUGO?