killzone_kid 51 Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Just curious would you like to see hitmarkers added? edit: well what about markers when you are getting hit Edited April 18, 2013 by Killzone_Kid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Felixthefriendlycat 92 Posted April 18, 2013 For realism nay. Imagine just shooting in a bush to see wether someone is there, just not realistic. Which is what this mod is all about 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
intensity 157 Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Or you could look out for blood on bullet impact.edit: well what about markers when you are getting hitEdit: You're just tired of being shot at, not knowing where it is coming from, and want it easier. $5 That's why you made this thread. Edited April 19, 2013 by Intensity on DayZ 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SmashT 10907 Posted April 18, 2013 Not a fan, we already have the blood splatter. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Talibambi 119 Posted April 18, 2013 Hitmarkers should be illegal! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josh225 129 Posted April 18, 2013 Most definitely nay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chris529 380 Posted April 18, 2013 definitely don't need hitmarkers, people would just spray bullets at anything that moves to check if there's someone there.For realism nay. Imagine just shooting in a bush to see wether someone is there, just not realistic. Which is what this mod is all aboutpretty much this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PuRe DAYZ 39 Posted April 18, 2013 this is the point of dayz. NOT KNOWING NAY < NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killzone_kid 51 Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) well how can you explain that vast majority of servers have nametags (which is worse) crosshairs and even 3rd view. Realism it is not. Edited April 18, 2013 by Killzone_Kid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jackghnnm78@gmail.com 23 Posted April 18, 2013 I would say nay. Arma is a milsim game. But it wouldn't be horrible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aussiestig 681 Posted April 18, 2013 Nope. You shouldn't be told when you hit someone, it's a stupid feature in my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R9Rsc68avHbs 8 Posted April 18, 2013 The mod's popularity is its curse in some respects. ^ Q.E.D. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Element47 2480 Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) nametags are horrible and iirc not the majority. crosshairs provide a way to synchronize the point where you are looking and where your avatar looks, the human focus is a rather precise tool and not easily reproduced on a screen. 3rd person view.. well.. i'd rather not have it, though i have to admit i use it times and again for convenience on servers where available.. its also a real help when landing a chopper as 1st person view is far too limited in comparison to real view inside the vehicles..hitmarkers however - definitely a no, like nametags. Edited April 18, 2013 by e47 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Acix 132 Posted April 18, 2013 Nope makes it more like CoD and less like real life. When u hit someone in real life you dont get a little icon popping up on your in head hud, why add that to DayZ... makes it less a sim and more just a shooter... I would vote against it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted April 18, 2013 No, what the hell are those things and what is their purpose? It makes no sense to me... I've never even seen that in a game.The only hitmarkers should be blood pouring out of the person from wherever you shot them. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fraggle (DayZ) 15720 Posted April 18, 2013 It's a big fat nay from me for the reasons listed above. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trichome (DayZ) 198 Posted April 18, 2013 No hitmarkers please, blood splatter is more than enough Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rossums 2190 Posted April 18, 2013 No, what the hell are those things and what is their purpose? It makes no sense to me... I've never even seen that in a game.The only hitmarkers should be blood pouring out of the person from wherever you shot them.You have never played a game with hit markers..?Really?Not Call of Duty, Battlefield? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crazy one 124 Posted April 18, 2013 You have never played a game with hit markers..?Really?Not Call of Duty, Battlefield?was thinking same thing must have played them surely.on topic Nay for reasons above Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOD™ 2795 Posted April 18, 2013 Hitmarkers are a no no. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aHzdaNny 49 Posted April 18, 2013 Most certainly nay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
liquidmind 320 Posted April 18, 2013 I liked how the character moved when the bullet hit him. I think a visual feedback of the body being hit would be enough.I don't know if the new ragdoll system will allow individual bodyparts to be pushed back, but that probably the best aid to see wether you hit or not. But considering other aids, "NO GUI" is the actual trend. So everything that is displayed on the screen, that you would not see in real life, should not be displayed on the screen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mzltv 2281 Posted April 18, 2013 I quite enjoy them in Battlefield.But that's Battlefield... and this is Arma... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terminal_boy 860 Posted April 18, 2013 No hitmarkers thank you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
