why good samiritans irritate me

[DeatHTaX 1217]

*yawn* Its the same gig every time man. You have nothing to say so you attack the person making the statement or its syntax.

 

 

I apologize I accredited too much to your skills of deduction. I has assumed they would be readily apparent to someone with even a rudimentary understanding of the concept. Alas, I lack both the time and interest to cater to your ineptitude but I assure you that if you peruse your previous posts you will figure it out in short order.

 

Oh look...isn't that what you JUST DID? lol wow, some people just don't have very good memory xD 

 

 

Anyway, to avoid a flamewar, you're both pretty, now back to the topic of discussion

[WrecklessMEDIC 129]

Oh look...isn't that what you JUST DID? lol wow, some people just don't have very good memory xD

Anyway, to avoid a flamewar, you're both pretty, now back to the topic of discussion

Was there ever really a topic though? Or was his whole point meant to start a flamewar?

[DeatHTaX 1217]

Was there ever really a topic though? Or was his whole point meant to start a flamewar?

 

Meh i would say a very polarized viewpoint of a certain topic, but not a flamewar. 

 

yes, Mac's opinion is incredibly charged and one sided, bordering on flame-status, however, I don't think it was meant to start the great flame wars of 2014

[dekartz 315]

Meh i would say a very polarized viewpoint of a certain topic, but not a flamewar. 

 

yes, Mac's opinion is incredibly charged and one sided, bordering on flame-status, however, I don't think it was meant to start the great flame wars of 2014

 

 

I disagree. His stated opinion and the way he's been dealing with those who disagree seem rather incensed towards starting a "flame-war" rather than having any actual discourse on the topic.

 

*In addition Edit*

 

All of Macdeth's recent posts fall very well into the picture painted of him by Aeoliana. Coincidence? OR ARE THEY THE SAME PERSON? Discuss.

Edited February 4, 2014 by Dekartz

[libertine 351]

Well I get plenty of human interaction as I am a server and foodrunner at a country club, and have been a part of that club since I was 11 as a young caddie. I have had plenty of interaction in life with other people and am quite social, yet I do enjoy a nice solitary start to a brand new game such as this.

 

What point exactly are you trying to make?

 

edit: i.e. you're "forum for kids" bit is a bit ambiguous to me...im not sure if that's a slight or if it's a genuine suggestion :/

I was just making a point relating to some of the discussion going on, trying to home in on the root cause. Could your desire for solitary gaming be related to anything else?

 

The forum for kids comment is my feeling about the insults being thrown out when there are real, understandable causes for feeling aversions to friendly or intimate behavior that are being out of ignorance. So much being ego based can make it a little hard to swallow as well, but these are just tips of an iceberg. I do wish their were separate forums for 20 and below, i see tons of incredibly insightful, often hard won information given by adults buried under bs all the time, which is just one reason.

[DeatHTaX 1217]

I was just making a point relating to some of the discussion going on, trying to home in on the root cause. Could your desire for solitary gaming be related to anything else?

 

The forum for kids comment is my feeling about the insults being thrown out when there are real, understandable causes for feeling aversions to friendly or intimate behavior that are being out of ignorance. So much being ego based can make it a little hard to swallow as well, but these are just tips of an iceberg. I do wish their were separate forums for 20 and below, i see tons of incredibly insightful, often hard won information given by adults buried under bs all the time, which is just one reason.

 

Ah okay :D I genuinely couldn't tell if you were being derogatory or if I was just misreading what you were trying to say

[aeoliana 22]

the thing is he spewed out his recycled psychobabble (post 1) which he unskilfully edited to shoehorn into some kind of relevant state pertaining rather weakly to this topic, but when asked to expand upon a few points he had made he was entirely unable to do so.

 

A faker is what he is and he is experiencing the fakers nightmare, being called out.

 

edit, as I typed he piped up lol. Nothing worth reporting mind, just a defensive brain fart of a post.

 

I haven't edited post 1 :(

 

I'm not sure what you mean by 'expand upon a few points', you asked for the 'reasons' and 'denials' that I was talking about. I quite clearly outlined the 'reasons' in that very same post and the 'denial' is the fact that this thread exists. Let me expound upon that:

Macdeth thinks the behavior in his post is 'wrong'

Macdeth exhibits behavior like that described in his post

 

It follows that Macdeth is doing something 'wrong'

 

Hypocrites complain about the wrongs of others while doing wrong

Macdeth is complaining about the wrongs of others

Macdeth is doing wrong

 

It follows that Macdeth is a hypocrite

 

The assumption is that a person aware of their hypocrisy would not willingly display this publicly but Macdeth does so brazenly and without apology. This would indicate that he either doesn't care that people are aware of the hypocrisy of his argument or that he is unaware of it entirely. It seems to me that he's a smart enough fellow to be able to see it if he looked hard enough, but because he does not it indicates denial of that behavior.

[Macdeth 176]

but because he does not it indicates denial of that behavior.

 

so you begin by accusing me of being in denial about some unexplained reasons behind unspecified actions, and that evolves into the existence of indicators that possibly suggest that I am in denial, yet you still fail to explain precisely what it is I am possibly in denial about.

 

Your trolling sir is of the very lowest quality and from this moment forward I shall spare myself the pain of experiencing any more of your clouded thinking and clumsy attempts at flaming by placing you on my ignore list.

 

As KoS might say 'please don't waste time make no replying I see nothing more from you never more' :thumbsup:  :D

[aeoliana 22]

so you begin by accusing me of being in denial about some unexplained reasons behind unspecified actions, and that evolves into the existence of indicators that possibly suggest that I am in denial, yet you still fail to explain precisely what it is I am possibly in denial about.

 

Your trolling sir is of the very lowest quality and from this moment forward I shall spare myself the pain of experiencing any more of your clouded thinking and clumsy attempts at flaming by placing you on my ignore list.

 

As KoS might say 'please don't waste time make no replying I see nothing more from you never more' :thumbsup:  :D

 

Again, the actions and reasons were quite clearly explained. Bye darling.

[dekartz 315]

so you begin by accusing me of being in denial about some unexplained reasons behind unspecified actions, and that evolves into the existence of indicators that possibly suggest that I am in denial, yet you still fail to explain precisely what it is I am possibly in denial about.

 

Your trolling sir is of the very lowest quality and from this moment forward I shall spare myself the pain of experiencing any more of your clouded thinking and clumsy attempts at flaming by placing you on my ignore list.

 

As KoS might say 'please don't waste time make no replying I see nothing more from you never more' :thumbsup:  :D

 

...

 

The "action" in question is the original post you made here.

 

What you're "in denial about" is your "hypocrisy in making said post"

 

The claim of hypocrisy comes from the fact that you're complaining about the playstyle of people whom you apparently believe unanimously complain about the "KOS Playstyle".

All of that was a pretty simple read.

[DeatHTaX 1217]

[over9000nukez 199]

I help people because it just lessens the load on some new survivor's back, it also helps them kick start up north if you give them some food and drink, which can sometimes take up to 30 minutes to get walking the coast for unlooted houses

[Macdeth 176]

...

 

The "action" in question is the original post you made here.

 

What you're "in denial about" is your "hypocrisy in making said post"

 

The claim of hypocrisy comes from the fact that you're complaining about the playstyle of people whom you apparently believe unanimously complain about the "KOS Playstyle".

All of that was a pretty simple read.

 

I'm not complaining, nor have I ever complained about anyone complaining about the KoS playstyle.

Therefore I am not being in any way hypocritical by taking exception to the gratitude addicts and therefore there is nothing to deny. and accordingly I have denied nothing.

 

So again, what on earth was he rambling on about?

[dekartz 315]

 Posted by Macdeth on Today, 06:57 AM

stay away from the coast unless you are actively seeking pvp encounters and don't come running to the forums, cheeks still moist with the confused tears of an idiot to bitch about how stupid you've been.

 

[DeatHTaX 1217]

 

 Posted by Macdeth on Today, 06:57 AM

stay away from the coast unless you are actively seeking pvp encounters and don't come running to the forums, cheeks still moist with the confused tears of an idiot to bitch about how stupid you've been.

 

 

 

I wouldn't really classify that as complaining :/

[Macdeth 176]

snip

 

 

 

nice try but there is absolutely nothing there that even remotely suggests hypocrisy .

 

In case you are unaware hypocrisy is the practise of saying one thing and doing another, so again no example is forthcoming, this leads to the aforementioned conclusion that I cannot possibly be in denial about something I haven't done.

[UNDERWORLD 76]

and what is so wrong with women?

Don't you like them? Because I do, I love em.

 

Strange way to attempt an insult in 2014, didn't you hear we're all equal now you ignorant git.

I believe he was making a reference to you sounding like a whinger, especially during -that- week of the month. If you'd ever had a girlfriend you'd know this, but judging by your anger I'd say Rosie Palm was your first and currently last.

Seriously though, get over yourself.

[Martmital 436]

I'm rarely a new spawn so have not witnessed such behaviour...

[Macdeth 176]

I believe he was making a reference to you sounding like a whinger, especially during -that- week of the month. If you'd ever had a girlfriend you'd know this, but judging by your anger I'd say Rosie Palm was your first and currently last.

Seriously though, get over yourself.

 

this is how it must feel for mike Tyson sparring with a gang of paraplegic 12 year olds, it's shockingly easy stuff.

 

Where to begin with this one?

lets take a closer look at this masterpiece of pure stupidity.

 

it begins with a strange reference to the female menstrual cycle, only a truly defective brain could hope to see the connection he is trying to make here, he then leaps to my private life, something he can't possibly know anything about. He expands upon this and suggests that I have never enjoyed the company of a woman, again something he can never know and then, demonstrating a painful lack of imagination and wit throws in a weak 'joke?' about wanking which only brings the tone of this utterly pointless attack to an even lower level than before and all the while, completely fails to make a single valid point or contribution to the topic.

 

This is the finest example you are ever likely to see of a thickie getting out of his depth.

[dekartz 315]

nice try but there is absolutely nothing there that even remotely suggests hypocrisy .

 

In case you are unaware hypocrisy is the practise of saying one thing and doing another, so again no example is forthcoming, this leads to the aforementioned conclusion that I cannot possibly be in denial about something I haven't done.

You are telling people to not come running to the forums to complain because they encountered something they didn't like in-game in the quoted post.

 

In the original post for this thread, you are complaining because you encountered something you didn't like in-game.

 

That sure seems like hypocrisy.

[Macdeth 176]

 

 

That sure seems like hypocrisy.

 

give up, you're even watering down your previous assertions.

 

you don't SEEM to know what hypocrisy even means.

[dekartz 315]

give up, you're even watering down your previous assertions.

 

you don't SEEM to know what hypocrisy even means.

I'm willing to admit to the possibility of being wrong. In most circles, this is considered a good trait.

 

hy·poc·ri·sy

hiˈpäkrisē/

noun

 

1. 1.

   the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform

    

    

Your behavior (namely this thread) does not conform to your stated belief that one should not "come running to the forum" in the event things do not go the way they want in DayZ.

[GoldenKade 73]

she said, while wasting time in the thread

*ping* deflected!

[aeoliana 22]

give up, you're even watering down your previous assertions.

 

you don't SEEM to know what hypocrisy even means.

 

[drgreenz420 1]

Get over yourself... its fucking simple.. play the way you want to play and avoid player interactions if you dont like the way you are treated..

 

grow up and realize that everything done in game.. is a part of a play style... if you dont like the way others play just avoid them and play all by yourself..

 

IT IS THAT SIMPLE!!! have a good day, dont let them nice people kill you with kindness, you will definately be the first.... such a pathetic way to qq on a forum lmao