Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ozelot (DayZ)

Combine pistols - dual wield

Recommended Posts

This should be added to allow for a higher magazine capacity with the trade off of lowered accuracy and not being able to aim down the sight.

 

Make it happen.

 

Inb4 "alpha hurrdurr"

 

Inb4 cod whining

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In matter of fact there is nothing wrong with this.

 

If you are level headed enough to stop and think about this, why should it not be in the game, in real life you would be more than wanting to duel wield in situation of spray and pray or when you run into a horde of the infected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try shooting two pistols at once in real life. You aren't going to hit anything unless you aim with one of them which defeats the point. I know. I've tried. The most you accomplish is looking like a Hollywood action star wannabe.

 

Or you're 10 yards away, which is impractical for anyone that is intelligent.

Edited by OfficerRaymond
  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try shooting two pistols at once in real life. You aren't going to hit anything unless you aim with one of them which defeats the point. I know. I've tried. The most you accomplish is looking like a Hollywood action star wannabe.

 

Or you're 10 yards away, which is impractical for anyone that is intelligent.

 

Yeah, but maybe that's what you want? Ain't nothing like executing a handcuffed player with dual wield :P (well, for me there is better, but some...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see what good this would do. If you're not aiming them you're not going to hit anything unless they make it like CoD and other games with dual wielding, but if you are taking the time to aim it's pointless, as said above.

 

You play DayZ and think, "You know what this needs? Dual wielding!"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but maybe that's what you want? Ain't nothing like executing a handcuffed player with dual wield :P (well, for me there is better, but some...)

I'd rather not execute them in the first place, and if I were to... I'd blow their head off with a shotgun filled with 00 buckshot for maximum splatter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea. but it should also take longer time to reload. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see what good this would do. If you're not aiming them you're not going to hit anything unless they make it like CoD and other games with dual wielding, but if you are taking the time to aim it's pointless, as said above.

 

You play DayZ and think, "You know what this needs? Dual wielding!"?

The point isnt to try and aim well. It's to rapidly fire a hail of bullets in the hope you hit something.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather not execute them in the first place, and if I were to... I'd blow their head off with a shotgun filled with 00 buckshot for maximum splatter.

 

As I said, it's not for me. but if some players want to put themselves at disadvantage... I don't mind :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point isnt to try and aim well. It's to rapidly fire a hail of bullets in the hope you hit something.

You can do that without dual wielding. 

 

 

They could add extended magazines if you're into that, I suppose, but I still don't see the logic. Why wouldn't you want to try and hit your target with accuracy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do that without dual wielding. 

 

 

They could add extended magazines if you're into that, I suppose, but I still don't see the logic. Why wouldn't you want to try and hit your target with accuracy?

Because the rate of fire is more important than accuracy in all sorts of situations-- Hell, I'd say most of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the rate of fire is more important than accuracy in all sorts of situations-- Hell, I'd say most of them.

 

That's where I simply disagree. If you want RoF then grab the M4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's where I simply disagree. If you want RoF then grab the M4.

M4? An M4 is an assault rifle. It has a high degree of accuracy with a moderate rate of fire.

 

There's a lot of weapons that outclass it on rate of fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dual-wielding pistols is IMO idiotic. I hope no resources are wasted on such a feature. What's next? Gangsta-stile pistol handling?

Edited by ParaB
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah all good points but you got to admit you would look seriously cool with two pistols, okay u might die due to not be able hit straight but u will die with smile on your face ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M4? An M4 is an assault rifle. It has a high degree of accuracy with a moderate rate of fire.

 

There's a lot of weapons that outclass it on rate of fire.

 

Pistols don't though.

 

I don't see your reasoning here.

 

You said you want to dual wield for RoF and hope a bullet hits. I recommend the M4 which has an automatic firing mode, which is undoubtedly a higher RoF than two pistols, and you still want to dual wield instead? What?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pistols don't though.

 

I don't see your reasoning here.

 

You said you want to dual wield for RoF and hope a bullet hits. I recommend the M4 which has an automatic firing mode, which is undoubtedly a higher RoF than two pistols, and you still want to dual wield instead? What?

What if all I have is a pair of pistols? Since when does everyone have an M4 in their pocket?

 

Another thing that doesn't make sense is the m4's size. It's so long yet you can swing it around indoors like it's a little flashlight in your hands. Very unrealistic.

Edited by Ozelot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad idea. Won't happen due to the insane resources necessary for a useless feature, such as creating huge amounts of new animations. Might not be possible in the engne either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if all I have is a pair of pistols? Since when does everyone have an M4 in their pocket?

 

Another thing that doesn't make sense is the m4's size. It's so long yet you can swing it around indoors like it's a little flashlight in your hands. Very unrealistic.

 

Sticking to the topic at hand...if you have two pistols then you have two pistols. Cool. Drop one.

 

 

If I have two rifles I don't make a suggestion to let me dual wield those like Rambo. I just don't pick up two rifles because I don't need two, I need one. Similarly it could be said, "Well I have 3 shirts, why can't I wear them all???"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sticking to the topic at hand...if you have two pistols then you have two pistols. Cool. Drop one.

 

 

If I have two rifles I don't make a suggestion to let me dual wield those like Rambo. I just don't pick up two rifles because I don't need two, I need one. Similarly it could be said, "Well I have 3 shirts, why can't I wear them all???"

Why would someone hold two rifles in their hands? They'd look stupid.

 

Holding two pistols makes you look swag.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×