-
Content Count
38 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
28 NeutralAbout Gadget_97
-
Rank
Woodland Warrior
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Belgium
Recent Profile Visitors
12959 profile views
-
Same size as before ? The 1.07 experimental only introduces one new weapon, 2 ammunition and amusement park locations as content. With the old team still here, we would get a lot more.
-
Dayz is only using parts of the new engine they are working on. Therefore it is doubtful we have this multi core server support (they would probably talk about it if something this big was planned). They very clearly state the opposite. Overall, you're not making any sense at all.
-
Dayz funded many projects at BI including their new engine. Therefore, even if dayz didn't make a lot of money in 2019 (how do you know ?), they could use some of the arma 3 money to help dayz's "post-release support" and keep some of their promises.
-
It should also be recalled that dayz is the best selling game of Bohemia Interactive. Considering this, such disdain from this company towards dayz is even more distasteful. From the beginning the higher-ups of BI never believed in the potential of dayz. No way they are out of money. They have probably made tons of it from consoles sales and arma 3 and dayz dlcs.
-
I feel like the higher-ups at BI (Marek Španěl...) must be laughing at us. Believers of the first promises, no one can deny it anymore, we have been bamboozled. Thanks for telling us the truth though.
-
I would have prefered some improvements for infected instead of bears... I don't understand the priorities at BI. I hope the devs working on AI will now focus on these. Moreover, wasn't the V3S hinted in the trailer ? Is it in ?
-
I don't like it. I hope you didn't weaken them too much.
-
You would have many more players if you had kept more promises. The concept behind dayz will never get old exactly like the zombie genre will always have some interest.
-
^ One of the best post here. Philbur has a very interesting point too: when the beta and 1.0 labels will not correspond in any way to the state of dayz, it will very well correspond to the state of the engine. It really seems like the CEO doesn't care about dayz. Martin, is bohemia about to move ressources from dayz to another project with this 1.0 ?
-
I admit that I use very strong words (firstly because I am angry and secondly because I'm not the best in english) but I don't think I am being manipulative. I just wish the devs understand how angry is an important part of the community and what will be the implications of their choice. It will have a major effect on the public image of the game. It will be an issue if everyone stay away from the game because of this bad press (1.0 was the best opportunity to make good press). If I am so angry it is because I care deeply about this game and I am honnestly thinking they are taking a bad decision.
-
It would not be more frustrating than a 1.0 this year. We're used to wait but we are not used to be stabbed in the back (it may sound overdramatic but it is the feeling of most of your fans). So you decide to offer the worst option... It seems to me like you are just taking the best decision for you dev team and we are left behind. Added frustation for people who were already angry to you. With your decision you are getting frustration from your adherent ! Don't you get it ? Can you promise us that the ps4 version won't come out this year then (It seems like you cannot release this version if it's not 1.0) ? No it's not. You are convincing yourselves that it is but it's not. It is maybe the best thing for you but not for your game.
-
Gadget_97 started following Status Report - 23 October 2018
-
Ho guys, where should I start ? We knew the 1.0 was strongly planned for this year, this is nothing new, but I think we were all expecting or hoping you would break this promise. You are about to give us one the emptiest 1.0 game of this decade and it is not fine. What about the infected being a threat and breaking doors, what about deadly diseases, what about 100 players per servers ? You say nothing about these very important features. All those years of waiting, you were repeating to us and we were repeating to ourselves to be patient, that the 1.0 would worth it. There we are, the 1.0 won't be worth it in the slightest. It is a big betrayal to your last and most supportives fans. It is like what the community is thinking is completely out of the equation. Be aware that your best allies can become your worst opponents. Yeah everything planned might come later but for people carying about the reputation of your game it is a disaster. The reviews will be horrendous, videos called "worst studio and development team in the history: the case of dayz" will come out by dozens. You were supposed to give us a good 1.0 and make most of the hater regret their words. Remember no man sky ? It is nothing like what is about to happen to you. I could never wear a dayz t-shirt and be proud of it if you give us an empty content-wise 1.0. (sorry for mistakes, english is not my first language)
-
Infected still weak. Bug with inventory
Gadget_97 replied to ThePryman's topic in New Player Discussion
I'm 100% with you on this but I think the devs should first nerf the block and fix the bug where the infected freeze with their arms raised at right angles. There are too many ammo too. -
No one will walk. People will always choose to sprint when they can. Sprint --> jog --> sprint --> jog is already the norm for 95% of players. Whatever the downsides, it is what people will do and after they will complain about how fast food and water decrease. This is why the devs should consider to remove the stamina regeneration while jogging.
-
0.63 Developer Live Stream - 14th March 2018
Gadget_97 replied to Baty Alquawen's topic in News & Announcements
Maybe but people will still use it to travel faster, I would like to see people keep it only for high stress situations.