Jump to content

Forums Announcement

Read-Only Mode for Announcements & Changelogs

Dear Survivors, we'd like to inform you that this forum will transition to read-only mode. From now on, it will serve exclusively as a platform for official announcements and changelogs.

For all community discussions, debates, and engagement, we encourage you to join us on our social media platforms: Discord, Twitter/X, Facebook.

Thank you for being a valued part of our community. We look forward to connecting with you on our other channels!

Stay safe out there,
Your DayZ Team

Mad koT

Lethal area

Recommended Posts

ALARM ! Wall of text !

It is duplicate of this topic:

http://dayzmod.com/f...ия-многа-букаф/

This is my translate. Just read the Suggestions (sorry for my English, I’m from Russia)

L.A. – lethal area (area of nuclear strike, in future area of use weapon mass destruction like chemical, biological ect.)

Suggestions

What all this about? - L.A. it’s a perfect barrier to stop the noob of getting all and now (cause - look next).

1. L.A. of tactical nuclear weapon not big (Military try to stop infection and launch some “rocket” ’s). Radioactive ruins of city’s (or not all city, only a part). If you crawling, you getting extra radiation dose (fallout).

2. Radiation defense: gas mask’s (with filters – need to change, or isolated with air gas cylinder – need to change\recharge). radiation protection suit (after L.A. need decontamination or throw out), Anti-Radiation tablets (body need decontamination too).

3. Loot in L.A. have induced radioactivity, if you eat, drink, eat tablets or do blood transfusion in L.A. you get extra radiation dose. In L.A. your loot, clothing, backpack and weapon get radiation dose too (you think leave L.A. and your problem left behind?) exception: top backpacks (must be hermetical) and radiation protection suit (your loot and backpack are in safe, because under suit).

4. Dosimeters (several models) – use on self, use on humans, use on your loot, use to monitoring area in front of.

5. The degree of exposure :

a. 0 no exposure

b. 1 lite exposure – need to eat and drink often, if stamina will be add then must melt more quickly, can be heal to state 0 without medical help (time heal, medics faster)

c. 2 average exposure – 50/50 chance eat and drink cause vomiting (if vomiting then drink and food did not worked), need to eat and drink often X2, slowly lose health, need to decontamination (tablets, blood transfusions), chance loss of consciousness.

d. 3 Heavy exposure – eat and drink cause vomiting (death after 10 or 20 minutes) need to eat and drink often X10, lose health, loss of consciousness, need to faster decontamination (tablets, multiple blood transfusions).

e. 4 lethal exposure – decontamination useless, death after 3 minutes in agony.

6. Radiation and zombies – I vote to zombies have immune to radiation (may be have some bonus in L.A.)

7. !!! Artifacts and Stalkers !!! – of course, what ZONE L.A. without artifacts? GTFO!!! (Stalkers resent). All bugs with artifacts will been fixed in 1.7.2.6

8. Radiations rains – chance of it tends to 100% the closer you to L.A. . If rain start you must find the cover or dress radiation protection suit, otherwise you can get radiation dose 2 (maybe 3), your dress and backpack get dose too. Rain did not exposure loot and area (maybe only small amount of time).

Edited by Mad koT
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty cool. I think it would work best to keep players from leaving the main game and building tent cities in the debug woods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nice idea for a natural wall that keeps players on chernarus, but theres some areas with decent loot that are procteted by this, the real wall can be like a zone totally blasted, fuming with chemicals and lots of radiation, something would need to metaphorically tip them of the wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything so radioactive it kills in a matter of minutes isnt going to stay that radioactive for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with nuclear fallout because this game seems like it's not post-nuclear apocalypse, it's post-zombie/infection apocalypse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything so radioactive it kills in a matter of minutes isnt going to stay that radioactive for long.

It would if it's the thermal radiation that kills you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would if it's the thermal radiation that kills you.

Thermal radiation is heat, like eggs being fried, etc. . .

The thermal radiation would be gone very quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need a huge map as fallout moves and more kit to protect you from the effects. A lot of these ideas could also be incorporated if Players submit to the infection. Players would feel the effects when they contracted a virus or radiation.

Is this I wonder, what Rocket is in talks with his Brother for? or is it simply just infected behaviour?

Good idea, providing the use of such weapons were authorised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with nuclear fallout because this game seems like it's not post-nuclear apocalypse, it's post-zombie/infection apocalypse.

Tactical nuclear weapon have L.A. in radius 5 km (may be smaller), fallout is aftermath.

For a good example remember film Resident Evil 2, post-zombie/infection apocalypse - yes, tactical nuclear weapon - yes.

Or you think military’s just stay a side?

Not all map must be a L.A., only some key city's (cause there must be a lot of zombie & infection)

I think it would be a couple of map’s and the road throat L.A. it’s a road to next map (with a advanced loot).

Edited by Mad koT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a trashy hollywood movie where the last resort is always a nuke.

That doesn't make sense. Why use an effective but primitive weapon if you have better conventional weapons available? Why contaminate an area you want to live on later? Why are there radioactive Zeds when there is no nuclear powerplant or any source of radiation? This is not S.T.A.L.K.E.R., there is already an ArmA mod that has this scenario.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DayZ scenario at the moment is very good. Just adding some background story will be enough. DayZ needs no serious changes in the storyline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.This is not a trashy hollywood movie where the last resort is always a nuke.

2.That doesn't make sense. Why use an effective but primitive weapon if you have better conventional weapons available?

3.Why contaminate an area you want to live on later?

4.Why are there radioactive Zeds when there is no nuclear powerplant or any source of radiation?

5.This is not S.T.A.L.K.E.R., there is already an ArmA mod that has this scenario.

1. This is your opinion.

2. What better conventional weapons (link please)?

3. Of course u right Zombie virus is much better then nuclear radiation.

4. Read your 3-d question, then read your 4 question, then read this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fallout

5. Yes this is not a stalker, it’s arma with zombies, and just now nothing more.

I am want create a barrier to stop the noob of getting all and now (stretching gameplay), not all map must be L.A. only small pass to cokes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. This is your opinion.

2. What better conventional weapons (link please)?

3. Of course u right Zombie virus is much better then nuclear radiation.

4. Read your 3-d question, then read your 4 question, then read this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fallout

5. Yes this is not a stalker, it’s arma with zombies, and just now nothing more.

I am want create a barrier to stop the noob of getting all and now (stretching gameplay), not all map must be L.A. only small pass to cokes!

Maybe you should unite your suggestions with the creator of the "Airborne virus 3.5" topic. Read it and you will understand me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. This is your opinion.

2. What better conventional weapons (link please)?

3. Of course u right Zombie virus is much better then nuclear radiation.

4. Read your 3-d question, then read your 4 question, then read this - http://en.wikipedia....Nuclear_fallout

5. Yes this is not a stalker, it’s arma with zombies, and just now nothing more.

I am want create a barrier to stop the noob of getting all and now (stretching gameplay), not all map must be L.A. only small pass to cokes!

Google yourself, the only thing you guys know of are nukes. And read below, the poster might be right.

Perhaps you might be more comfortible playing Fallout 3?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Google yourself, the only thing you guys know of are nukes. And read below, the poster might be right.

You are dweller of nuclear weapon testing area or Hiroshima, Nagasaki? Can you share with us your nuclear knowledge, luminous.

This is my town: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angarsk

Just for you i copy this text:

Angarsk also hosts a showcase international nuclear fuel cycle center, which will be one of the first Russian enrichment centers to be placed under IAEA safeguards. Angarsk is also the site for a Nuclear Fuel Bank, following a decision by the IAEA in November 2009; working with Russia, IAEA established this bank to supply market priced fuel to member states as protection against possible supply disruptions.

Questions?

Perhaps you might be more comfortable playing Fallout 3?

Is Fallout 3 bad game?

Perhaps you might be more comfortable playing Dead Island solo?

Edited by Mad koT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything so radioactive it kills in a matter of minutes isnt going to stay that radioactive for long.

you are kidding me right? how about you take a walk inside the old reactor of chernobyl? i bet you wont make it half an hour without anti-radiation equipment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't Chernobyl considered 'safe' and reopened to the public now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He mean reactor area, near and inside protective sarcophagus. This is restricted area.

Radiation half life fallout like Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 near 30 years.

The Exclusion Zone is open for people, but didn't safe it's a dangeros area (Spesial area - nuclear power station, 10 km area and 30 km area).

On entry and exit dose control.

Strongly recomendate: respirator, dosimeter, gloves and other protection clothing.

Strongly NOT recommended: eat, drink and smoke

P.S.

Modern tactical nuclear weapons contaminate a small area (cause nuclear power conversion to explosion fuller).

Edited by Mad koT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i would love to see this.

nukes and zombies connect, people.. it could be the cause of zombies.

gas masks need to be one of the top 10 priorities to get!

Edited by CaptainBingo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×