atempleton 123 Posted June 22, 2015 Simple changes that make sense that balance ammunition carry space and capacity whilst being realistic:.308 Winchester - Maximum stacks of 20 to balance with 7.62x54mmR.7.62x39mm - Maximum stacks of 30 to balance with other assault rifle cartridges. Will also make drum mags less economical.12 Gauge - Maximum stacks of 20 to balance with .308.30 Round STANAG (Coupled) - Change dimensions to 2x2 to account for the fact it's two magazines and make the carrying less economical. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
star-lord252 83 Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) I don't really see the need but what REALLY needs to be balanced for ammo is were they spawn.1-12 gauge needs to be a little bit more common there civilian rounds they need to spawn more in civilian homes.2-7.62×39 should spawn rarely in civilian homes there's a good amount of civilian rifles that chamber this round(SKS is both military and civilian)3-45 acp should spawn extremely rarely in civilian homes there's a lot of 1911s.4-slugs should come back in again and have its box of ammo(10 rounds of slugs).The stanag coupled thing really should be changed doesn't make sense though we don't have to worry about seeing no 60rd mag anymore the m4 dual drum should come in soon. Edited June 22, 2015 by DaNic2553 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil Minion 943 Posted June 23, 2015 (edited) I don't really see the needFull power rounds are more powerful at the cost of increased size, weight and recoil. That's why in most modern army standard rifleman are eqipped with low caliber or intermediate rounds. To represent this stack size and weight (heavier from left to right) should be adjusted:15 - 12 gauge20 - .308 Winchester and 7.62x54mmR25 - 7.62x39mmR, 9x39mm30 - 5.45x39mm, 5.56x45mm40 - .380 Auto, 9mm, .45 ACP50 - .22LRIn terms of hit value (which in some way translates into damage) the .45 ACP round is way too strong and should be closer to 9mm. I propose reducing the hit value from 9 to 7.5. Also weapons should feature muzzle velocity according to their real life counterparts which might also affect ammo balance. And finally rarity. The 7.62x39 round being an exclusively military round gimps several lower tier weapons completely. Same with .45 ACP rounds. Both should spawn in civilian or hunting locations as well although not in great numbers. This should actually be a general thing to smooth out ammo possession - maybe increase magazine spawns while decreasing box spawns and make stacks spawn much smaller on average. Edited June 23, 2015 by Evil Minion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OnionOfShame 138 Posted June 23, 2015 I agree with most of your points on stack size rebalancing, except the .308 Winchester. The Winchester rounds are smaller and weaker than 7.62x54mmR, and should therefore stack higher (to 25 or 30 maybe).Full power rounds are more powerful at the cost of increased size, weight and recoil. That's why in most modern army standard rifleman are eqipped with low caliber or intermediate rounds.To represent this stack size and weight (heavier from left to right) should be adjusted:15 - 12 gauge20 - .308 Winchester and 7.62x54mmR25 - 7.62x39mmR, 9x39mm30 - 5.45x39mm, 5.56x45mm40 - .380 Auto, 9mm, .45 ACP50 - .22LRIn terms of hit value (which in some way translates into damage) the .45 ACP round is way too strong and should be closer to 9mm. I propose reducing the hit value from 9 to 7.5. Also weapons should feature muzzle velocity according to their real life counterparts which might also affect ammo balance.And finally rarity. The 7.62x39 round being an exclusively military round gimps several lower tier weapons completely. Same with .45 ACP rounds. Both should spawn in civilian or hunting locations as well although not in great numbers. This should actually be a general thing to smooth out ammo possession - maybe increase magazine spawns while decreasing box spawns and make stacks spawn much smaller on average.Most of these stack sizes are good, except for shotgun shells (should be 20 in my opinion) and the .308 (as explained above) in my opinion. I disagree with you on the .45 ammunition's power, in real life these rounds can easily kill a person in a single shot and this should be reflected in-game. I agree with your points on ammunition distribution though. There's no point in the IZH-18 or CR527 existing at all as the ammunition is nearly impossible to find for them without going to military bases, at which point you're likely to have the SKS which is pretty much objectively superior (but if you think about it the SKS shouldn't even spawn in military locations because it wouldn't really be in service anymore, but I digress). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil Minion 943 Posted June 23, 2015 While .308 Winchester is slightly smaller than 7.62x54mmR the difference is pretty marginal and doesn't really justify a different stack size (unless .308 Winchester gets 21 round stacks which would be pretty odd). The lower power (~5% less also not that much) might also come with slightly lower recoil. 12 gauge is much broader than both so I think stacks of 15 are justified. .45 ACP is hyped. 9mm rounds can also easily kill a person in a single shot. .45 ACP might be a little more powerful (it seems performance data overlaps so you can also find .45 ACP rounds weaker than more powerful 9mm ones) but much closer to 9mm than to the way more powerful .357 Magnum. In Dayz a shot from a Colt 1911 is somehow just as powerful as a shot from a Repeater which is hardly authentic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
star-lord252 83 Posted June 23, 2015 (edited) Full power rounds are more powerful at the cost of increased size, weight and recoil. That's why in most modern army standard rifleman are eqipped with low caliber or intermediate rounds.To represent this stack size and weight (heavier from left to right) should be adjusted:15 - 12 gauge20 - .308 Winchester and 7.62x54mmR25 - 7.62x39mmR, 9x39mm30 - 5.45x39mm, 5.56x45mm40 - .380 Auto, 9mm, .45 ACP50 - .22LRIn terms of hit value (which in some way translates into damage) the .45 ACP round is way too strong and should be closer to 9mm. I propose reducing the hit value from 9 to 7.5. Also weapons should feature muzzle velocity according to their real life counterparts which might also affect ammo balance.And finally rarity. The 7.62x39 round being an exclusively military round gimps several lower tier weapons completely. Same with .45 ACP rounds. Both should spawn in civilian or hunting locations as well although not in great numbers. This should actually be a general thing to smooth out ammo possession - maybe increase magazine spawns while decreasing box spawns and make stacks spawn much smaller on average.agreed the stacks of ammo could be changed higher(I can stuff 40 9mm in my pocket not that hard. As for the 45 acp that should be changed it is way to powerful the kings of handguns damage wise should be the revolver or the upcoming desert eagle. Edited June 23, 2015 by DaNic2553 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 24, 2015 It makes sense ammo should be balanced by weight, size or both. From heaviest to lightest: 12ga 2-3/4 = 46.5 g .308 = 24.5 g 9x39 = 23.5 g 7.62x54R = 22.8 g .45 ACP = 21.3 7.62x39 = 16.4 g 357 Mag = 16.2 g 9x19 = 12.3 5.56x45 = 12.2 g 5.45x39= 10.3 g .380 = 9.5 g .22 LR = 3.3 g So if we say 1 square allows us 20 .308 cartridges, by weight we should have: 10 x 12-gauge cartridges 22 x 7.62x54R cartridges 30 x 7.62x39 cartridges 30 x .357 Magnum cartridges 20 x 9x39 cartridges 40 x 5.56x45 cartridges 48 x 5.45x39 cartridges 22 x .45 ACP cartridges 40 x 9x19 cartridges 52 x .380 ACP cartridges 148 x .22 LR cartridges We could round that to 10 x 12-gauge 20 x 7.62x54R, .308, 9x39, .45 ACP 30 x 7.62x39, .357 Magnum 40 x 5.56x45, 9x19 50 x 5.45x39, .380 ACP 150 x .22 LR But I guess there's also the space to consider. Volume, high to low, taking each cartridge as a cylinder* (case base dia. x C.O.L.) 12ga 2-3/4 = 19.4 cm³ 7.62x54R = 9.3 cm³ 7.62x51 = 8.1 cm³ 9x39 = 5.7 cm³ 7.62x39 = 5.7 cm³ 5.45x39= 4.5 cm³ 5.56x45 = 4.2 cm³ .45 ACP = 3.7 cm³ 357 Mag = 2.9 cm³ 9x19 = 2.3 cm³ .380 = 1.8 cm³ .22 LR = 0.66 cm³ And that by itself would give us: 8 x 12-gauge 18 x 7.62x54R 28 x 7.62x39 28 x 9x39 36 x 5.45x39 38 x 5.56x45 44 x .45 ACP 56 x .357 Magnum 70 x 9x19 90 x .380 245 .22 LR *for simplicity's sake. A .308 cartridge has an actual volume of approx. 5.6 cm³. Which combined would look something like this if we're basing this on 20-round stacks of .308: 10 x 12-gauge 20 x .308, 7.62x54R 25 x 9x39 30 x 7.62x39 25-30 x 45 ACP 30-40 x .357 Mag 35-40 x 5.56x45 40-45 x 5.45x39 40-50 x 9x19 50-60 x .380 100-200 x .22 LR 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 26, 2015 imo it should be based on weight not category. 203 grain .45 acp should stack at lower numbers than 40 grain .22lr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil Minion 943 Posted June 26, 2015 I think it should rather be based on volume as weight is a different value and basing stack size on weight might make it "count twice". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites