Would you support a desicion to replace the Infusion engine?

[AlphaDogMeat . 493]

It's none of my business what they use.  I'm here to consume the product, not quibble over every minuscule, nit-picking detail.

[Damnyourdeadman 1045]

@Damnyourdeadman

 

You have to accept that you are gravely underestimating the amount of work it takes to switch/change gameengines.

It is by no means a simple task.

 

If you want DayZ: SA to be in alpha for another 2-4 years then don't stop asking for a complete change.

 

However if you can accept the fact that they are working on the engine and remodeling it for their purpose then wait for Enfusion to go live.

And keep playing DayZ and whatever will follow afterwards. It takes time for changes and improvements...and maybe we will see a DayZ SA followup with an even better engine in 4 or 5 years.

 

In all honestly,i have to admit that i'm a little worried...

Seeing so many awesome suggestions like rivers and underground areas get shot down every day here on the forums because of engine restrictions...it kinda makes you skeptical.

As a person that followed development,with the mindset that the SA version will overcome the restrictions from the mod days i can't help but get frustrated seeing other engines

provide more.

[Irish. 4886]

I'm unsure how you can create an engine "more modern" than one being created -right now-.

 

Your assumption is based upon an incomplete understanding of what is being done, ala the creation of a new engine from a bare bones framework of the previous technology - which is what is done when engines are iterated upon. eg: Unreal, Cryengine, iDTech, and so on.

Also "Enfusion"

 

In other words... /endthread. 

 

^_^

[Baker. 1484]

 

Your assumption is based upon an incomplete understanding of what is being done

 

My new sig, as it applies a solid 78% of what I read here.

[boneboys 7988]

Endgame.

Σας ευχαριστώ, κλειστά.