gemellus 77 Posted June 24, 2014 I'm excited for the possible MP5 addition. Favorite gun of all time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 24, 2014 I'm excited for the possible MP5 addition. Favorite gun of all time. There are 2 mp5 files listed I really hope one is the standard mp5a4-a5 etc. something iconic about the mp5 family of firearms. I just have my fingers crossed they include a stock with the mp5k and it does not spawn without one . ........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 Phewww looks like it does spawn with a stock. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chaingunfighter 917 Posted June 25, 2014 Phewww looks like it does spawn with a stock.Does it come with 15 round magazines? I really hope you can find those. As impractical as it would be, the whole; stockless MP5K with a 15 round magazine sounds incredibly badass. (And if they ever make weight a factor, I guess that could be one small advantage) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 Does it come with 15 round magazines? I really hope you can find those. As impractical as it would be, the whole; stockless MP5K with a 15 round magazine sounds incredibly badass. (And if they ever make weight a factor, I guess that could be one small advantage)Not sure about the 15 round magazines or if it even spawns with a stock. I just hope they spawn with stocks and if people want to remove them then by all means go ahead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 25, 2014 That MP5K barrel looks different from the earlier leak. Looks like it has some kind of UMP-style pronged flash suppressor, which if it's an attachment shouldn't be able to fit on there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 That MP5K barrel looks different from the earlier leak. Looks like it has some kind of UMP-style pronged flash suppressor, which if it's an attachment shouldn't be able to fit on there. Yea the attachment system is pretty stupid. I almost wish it did not exist at this point it only makes the game worse and pushes realism further out of reach. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chaingunfighter 917 Posted June 25, 2014 Yea the attachment system is pretty stupid. I almost wish it did not exist at this point it only makes the game worse and pushes realism further out of reach.It's such a minor detail, I can't understand why people get so annoyed by something so small. Then again, I get annoyed by the simplest grammatical errors, so I may be hypocritical, but whatever. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 SMGs are good thought. Wonder if the new smgs will open the doors for a .45 acp smg such as the mac 10 As far as I know the mac 10 is the most common full auto firearm in civilian hands. These things were so ridiculously cheap in the past think they sold initially at their introduction for like 120 or something dollars. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 25, 2014 It's such a minor detail, I can't understand why people get so annoyed by something so small. Then again, I get annoyed by the simplest grammatical errors, so I may be hypocritical, but whatever. Easily preventable, easily alterable, and no need for it... I don't get annoyed if something's prevented by an engine limitation or some such, but a flash suppressor attachment for the MP5K is not necessary or helpful and it's not even physically possible with the original barrel, could have been left out entirely or they could have modeled a different three-lug barrel in the first place. I really hate addition of attachments for attachments' sakes. Like the Mosin compensator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 Easily preventable, easily alterable, and no need for it... I don't get annoyed if something's prevented by an engine limitation or some such, but a flash suppressor attachment for the MP5K is not necessary or helpful and it's not even physically possible with the original barrel, could have been left out entirely or they could have modeled a different three-lug barrel in the first place. I really hate addition of attachments for attachments' sakes. Like the Mosin compensator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
liquidsnake 275 Posted June 25, 2014 ^ What the hell is that? :lol: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 ^ What the hell is that? :lol: What happens when you design weapons in games with the intention of having it work with the highest amount of accessories. Not very different from this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buffaloe 87 Posted June 25, 2014 (edited) I'm kind of fine with that, as long as guns and attachements are reasonably rare, and don't shoot lasers. I could not care much less whether some supressor thingy is feasible or not with a certain kind of gun barrel. Edited June 25, 2014 by Buffaloe 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
St. Jimmy 1631 Posted June 25, 2014 What happens when you design weapons in games with the intention of having it work with the highest amount of accessories. Not very different from this. In real life you can go beyond this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 (edited) In real life you can go beyond this.I know I have seen some of the atrocities. That is a single shot .22lr survival rifle that a mall ninja got his hands on. Tacticooled the heck out of it.He should have added some offset iron sights though thats the only thing I can think off that would have made the pic funnier. Edited June 25, 2014 by kichilron 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chaingunfighter 917 Posted June 25, 2014 I know I have seen some of the atrocities.So what exactly is wrong with having aftermarket attachments, even if you consider them "tacticool"? Should every gun in the game be essentially the base firearm, and maybe let the M4 have one or two of its optic attachments? Talk about uninteresting gameplay.The whole idea that they're affecting dispersion and accuracy when they shouldn't be is something I'm opposed to, but if they were just purely aesthetic then I see nothing wrong with having them in-game.Besides, putting rails on an AK is something that's done all the time, all over the place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 25, 2014 (edited) So what exactly is wrong with having aftermarket attachments, even if you consider them "tacticool"? Should every gun in the game be essentially the base firearm, and maybe let the M4 have one or two of its optic attachments? Talk about uninteresting gameplay.The whole idea that they're affecting dispersion and accuracy when they shouldn't be is something I'm opposed to, but if they were just purely aesthetic then I see nothing wrong with having them in-game.Besides, putting rails on an AK is something that's done all the time, all over the place. Problem I have with it is that attachments are added just for the sake of having them. Then these attachments are made compatible with the maximum amount of weapons in the game just for the sake of it.almost to validate the effort and work it took to develop the attachment. The end result is you have some weapons in game looking like they came from the basement of some derp kid who watches too many youtube videos on operators and tactics a kid who attaches molle on everything . Silly and aesthetically ugly not to mention it could affect the direction of the game. Instead of having the mosin for instance be a low tier iron sighted gun as it would probably be encountered in a SHTF scenario it instead is a 1400m l33t snipa rifle why ? because the attachments gotta go somewhere so I guess they might as work on this 100 year old service rifle right ? It then also turns the akm a weapon most often seen around the world as a basic assault rifle that is trusty and reliable a gun of the people into a do you even operate bro rifle with its drum mags and its slick black rails for maximum operating. Minor problem but one that makes people cringe when they see it. Edited June 25, 2014 by kichilron Spoilers! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pilgrim* 3514 Posted June 25, 2014 ^Ive got to admit, gibonez, you have my beans there what is this (omg)a ghetto-blaster ?a telephone ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katana67 2907 Posted June 25, 2014 (edited) Phewww looks like it does spawn with a stock. Foregrip /swoon EDIT - And your "reali-tard" points are skyrocketing today. Edited June 25, 2014 by Katana67 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sirwarriant12 94 Posted June 26, 2014 If they put any form of anti-material rifle in the game would much prefer something like the PTRS-41, it seems much more fitting for the setting. Make it rare, the ammo even rarer, awkward as hell to carry and have to be prone or setup somewhere to shoot it, oh and no scope. Make it more of a vehicle ambush weapon. It's stilll being used in places like Ukraine and Syria. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 26, 2014 If they put any form of anti-material rifle in the game would much prefer something like the PTRS-41, it seems much more fitting for the setting. Make it rare, the ammo even rarer, awkward as hell to carry and have to be prone or setup somewhere to shoot it, oh and no scope. Make it more of a vehicle ambush weapon. It's stilll being used in places like Ukraine and Syria. Yes perfect weapon for that role but please put in a stamina and weight system first. I can imagine how silly it would look to see a person sprinting at 30 mph with that huge heavy gun on their back. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingofTheWorld 44 Posted June 26, 2014 Thats shame look at this ugly weapon pm63rak. Instead of Scorpion vz. 61 they adding that ugly gun <_< 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 26, 2014 Thats shame look at this ugly weapon pm63rak. Instead of Scorpion vz. 61 they adding that ugly gun <_< Yes because the way a gun looks is important right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rotteck 104 Posted June 26, 2014 Yes because the way a gun looks is important right. this :) guns were designed to be functional, and easy to use, not to look cool(altough i think that most guns just look awesome. is this just me ? :D ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites