pixelbl4ster@yahoo.ca 7 Posted September 20, 2012 (edited) Intel i5-2310 Quad Core 2.90 GHzSapphire HD 5750 1GB6 GB ramWindows 7 64-bitI get around 50-60 FPS with the lowest settings possible.I've seen some people with inferior builds and they're getting better FPS with higher settingsThose are my additional launcher parameters-cpuCount=4 -maxMem=2047 -skipIntro -nosplash -noPauseI also tried to run this game on higher settings and it doesn't lag less, it lags even more, especially when i'm looking at those damn forests. Edited September 20, 2012 by PixelBlast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kannibalkiwi 7 Posted September 20, 2012 god knows, arma is a beast, i have a crappy laptop and can run it in 30fps, my friend has a £2000 laptop and can run it at 40 :L Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Inception. 9443 Posted September 20, 2012 50-60 is still playable, no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syndicatefaction 118 Posted September 20, 2012 (edited) 50-60 is great FPS. Nothing to be ashamed of. Most wish they could run that well. Your 2.9 MIGHT be the culprit. Not 100% on that though. Still check around for some video card adjustments that might help. Edited September 20, 2012 by SyndicateFaction Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobDole (DayZ) 129 Posted September 20, 2012 if you have 6 gigs of memory why do you tell arma to use 2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdz (DayZ) 238 Posted September 20, 2012 Wait, what? You're complaining about 50-60 FPS? I'm stoked when I get 25! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pixelbl4ster@yahoo.ca 7 Posted September 20, 2012 Wait, what? You're complaining about 50-60 FPS? I'm stoked when I get 25!Of course i am.Dude, with this PC, supposedly i can run the game at max settings without a problem but no, the optimization is so bad that i'm stuck with lowest settings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaysGoodLiquor 93 Posted September 20, 2012 Dat electricity. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Delta Smoke 01 765 Posted September 21, 2012 Of course i am.Dude, with this PC, supposedly i can run the game at max settings without a problem but no, the optimization is so bad that i'm stuck with lowest settings.Sorry to say but your pc is average mate. I shelled out £2000 on my desktop. I still drop to 35fps in cherno and elektro on max settings. The guy a few posts above is partially right btw. Your CPU and GPU are your problem. Arma 2, although 3 years old now, is one of the most demanding games ever made. Especially on the CPU. Those command lines you use will not give you any boost at all. Arma 2 already uses the maximum it can from your pc on all fronts. I recommend disabling shadows, bumping a few things up to medium setting (low settings puts more strain on your CPU) and going into your ati settings and disabling ambient occlusion. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pixelbl4ster@yahoo.ca 7 Posted September 21, 2012 Sorry to say but your pc is average mate. I shelled out £2000 on my desktop. I still drop to 35fps in cherno and elektro on max settings. The guy a few posts above is partially right btw. Your CPU and GPU are your problem. Arma 2, although 3 years old now, is one of the most demanding games ever made. Especially on the CPU. Those command lines you use will not give you any boost at all. Arma 2 already uses the maximum it can from your pc on all fronts. I recommend disabling shadows, bumping a few things up to medium setting (low settings puts more strain on your CPU) and going into your ati settings and disabling ambient occlusion.That's according to "system requirements"But how do i disable ambient occlusion? I don't see it anywhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Derpy_Hooves (DayZ) 4521 Posted September 21, 2012 im running a Duel Core AM2 2400 and HD5450 512MB and 4GB OCZ RAM, struggles a little in the bigger towns but generally runs ok... enough for me to continue playing it till i can afford an upgrade Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hetstaine 10852 Posted September 21, 2012 Turn it off in your nvidia control panel dude :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobDole (DayZ) 129 Posted September 21, 2012 Of course i am.Dude, with this PC, supposedly i can run the game at max settings without a problem but no, the optimization is so bad that i'm stuck with lowest settings.lol try getting an i7 and a good nvidia card if you want better, you dont need to run this game with post process and anti aliasing on or on maxed settings, it still looks good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hawc 63 Posted September 21, 2012 if you have 6 gigs of memory why do you tell arma to use 2?Most games can only use that much since for some reason developers don't make 64bit games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Delta Smoke 01 765 Posted September 21, 2012 That's according to "system requirements"But how do i disable ambient occlusion? I don't see it anywhere.Not sure for ati users mate. Im an nvidia user. It boosts +10 fps if you can find it though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puppetworx 474 Posted September 21, 2012 (edited) I have a very similar setup OP (5750, Intel Quad @3.2GHz) and get the same results (50-60fps, 30-45fps in cities). I've spent a lot of time and tried varying every setting to maximize my framerate and minimize stutter by using the ArmA2: OA benchmark along with the FRAPS benchmarking routine. The config I came up with was this which sounds very similar to yours.Long story short: there is nothing more you can do to boost performance beyond a hardware upgrade. I'll be punting for a 7770 in time for the standalone release probably as I've identified that the CPU is not the limiting factor. Edited September 21, 2012 by puppetworx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushcrush 20 Posted September 21, 2012 My pc is only worth 800$ and I run at a solid 50+ fps on maximum settings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christopherwright_75@hotmail.co.uk 109 Posted September 21, 2012 (edited) Your i5 is not the good one its the bottom draw versionYour 5750 is a bottom end gaming card too6GB RAM indicates your not running dual channel which may not be a total killer but it shows whoever built your machine didnt really know what they were doing (unless you have some weird bastardisation of 2 + 2 + 1 + 1)Your getting the kind of performance you should you may garner a few FPS moving some things higher than low therefore taking load away from the CPU to the GPU though as your GPU is pretty far from beast the increase would be limited (if at all) Edited September 21, 2012 by wr6133 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
electroban 102 Posted September 21, 2012 i have a phenom IIX4 995(maybe)and a nvidia 460 GTX.Which is pretty even with what your setup is except u got more ram than i do, but no games are using that much ram anyway.I'm getting about 40-60 FPS. My only problem with my games performance of my machine is just the occasional stutter when i go to zoom in on something and itll stutter slightly for a bit, mostly this happens thru scopes and bionuclars, it clears up after a few seconds, just immersion breaking. Also bro it may be bad luck, and actually can be dependant on servers, some servers my FPS will be alot more choppy than other servers, so I hope you have atleast hopped around a good 5/10 servers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Xuse 92 Posted September 21, 2012 Erm.... How do I display my FPS ingame? ^_^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raible 24 Posted September 21, 2012 I have a 3.4GHz and a 570GTX and I can't max everything out without taking some FPS drops. I think you are overestimating the power of your rig. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xSLIMJIM33x 0 Posted September 22, 2012 I get 15 fps at most...on the lowest setting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
colekern 1364 Posted September 22, 2012 Intel i5-2310 Quad Core 2.90 GHzSapphire HD 5750 1GB6 GB ramWindows 7 64-bitI get around 50-60 FPS with the lowest settings possible.I've seen some people with inferior builds and they're getting better FPS with higher settingsThose are my additional launcher parameters-cpuCount=4 -maxMem=2047 -skipIntro -nosplash -noPauseI also tried to run this game on higher settings and it doesn't lag less, it lags even more, especially when i'm looking at those @#!*% forests.Please don't ever let me see that .GIF again. Ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites