blitzz92 7 Posted December 27, 2014 (edited) Hello so I wanted to share some experience and to get some feedback on the rig that can play this beast at constant frames per seccond above 35.What I have now is (upgrades will be made):MSI GM760 P-21 Mobo (shitty I know).AMD FX 6100 @ 3.3Ghz. (also shitty).WD Caviar Green 1Tb.Corsair RM750. ASUS Strix GTX 970.Unknown manufacturer 8Gb RAM @ 1300 mhzWhat I'm now aiming for is:ASUS Maximus VII HeroIntel i7 4790KIntel 730 480Gb SSDCorsair RM750Corsair Vengeance DDR3 @ 1866 mhz 16GbASUS Strix GTX 970 at some point going to be SLIMaybe anyone has something similar and could guide me through the FPS at DayZ? As I am building this system right now I want to know if it's any good or it will be just a waste of money. Abd yes i know that my CPU is currently hardcore bottlenecking my GPU but soon I'm getting the new mobo with i7. Thanks in advance.And here comes my experience with AMD. Right now at cities I'm getting 14-19 FPS @ 1080p. So anyone who is considering buying AMD FX 6xxx processor please don't. It's not future proof. When this CPU came out it was a competetor to i5 at the equivalent gen and right now it's just a piece of junk. And at this point the equivalent gen i5 completely destroys AMD FX 6100 at any task. I was a long term AMD user and no more. Bulldozer does not clean the sand off the bridge it's more like he's cleaning the sand off my grandma's ass. :) Edited December 27, 2014 by blitzz92 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jfiles 439 Posted December 27, 2014 (edited) I am an all AMD user. And I recommend an FX 8350. But DayZ is so poorly optimized that it will still not run like another game like Arma 3 would run with that processor. But I just upgraded to the 8350 and would personally go for it. EDIT: Off of personal experience DayZ CURRENTLY does not use both GPUs if you crossfire, or SLI. But that may be incorrect, but that is how it works for me because it does not use my 2nd GPU. Edited December 27, 2014 by Jfiles 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitzz92 7 Posted December 27, 2014 I am an all AMD user. And I recommend an FX 8350. But DayZ is so poorly optimized that it will still not run like another game like Arma 3 would run with that processor. But I just upgraded to the 8350 and would personally go for it. EDIT: Off of personal experience DayZ CURRENTLY does not use both GPUs if you crossfire, or SLI. But that may be incorrect, but that is how it works for me because it does not use my 2nd GPU.Thanks for your reply mate! Glad to see that AMD still can do the job done. What rig do you have and what FPS do you have in Cherno, Elektro and other cities? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jfiles 439 Posted December 27, 2014 Thanks for your reply mate! Glad to see that AMD still can do the job done. What rig do you have and what FPS do you have in Cherno, Elektro and other cities?Specs:2 R7 260X (Cross Fire)FX- 8350990X Extreme 31 TB Hard drive 584 GH Hard driveCorshair 750w But, I havnt actually been in the new towns. I just upgraded yesterday and I havnt had much time to play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitzz92 7 Posted December 27, 2014 Specs:2 R7 260X (Cross Fire)FX- 8350990X Extreme 31 TB Hard drive 584 GH Hard driveCorshair 750w But, I havnt actually been in the new towns. I just upgraded yesterday and I havnt had much time to play.Nice! Let me know when you'll visit the towns! :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zanbato 48 Posted December 27, 2014 I use the FX8350 overclocked to 4.5Ghz and very rarely see fps drops. I know someones gonna mention intel cpus are better for gaming blah blah but some of us do more than game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitzz92 7 Posted December 27, 2014 (edited) I use the FX8350 overclocked to 4.5Ghz and very rarely see fps drops. I know someones gonna mention intel cpus are better for gaming blah blah but some of us do more than game.It's not about that it's just that I see no futureproofness at AMD's and I've been using AMD since Athlon 64 and when I bought FX 6100 I was happy at first but now I have a major dissapointment to it. I mean it was an i5 competetor but now even 1st. gen i5 760 outperforms FX 6100 which is really sad. Happy to see your satisfaction with AMD mate. Maybe I just went for the wrong CPU... Edited December 27, 2014 by blitzz92 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zak.preston@gmail.com 8 Posted December 28, 2014 It's not about that it's just that I see no futureproofness at AMD's and I've been using AMD since Athlon 64 and when I bought FX 6100 I was happy at first but now I have a major dissapointment to it. I mean it was an i5 competetor but now even 1st. gen i5 760 outperforms FX 6100 which is really sad. Happy to see your satisfaction with AMD mate. Maybe I just went for the wrong CPU... Modern AMD CPUs are only worth for for gaming when overclocked to 4.5GHz, sadly. Even than they struggle to compete with i5 CPUs in many games. I bought my AMD gaming laptop MSI GX60 only because I love AMD , but I didn't expect that their top laptop CPU would be so much inferior to Intel CPUs... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitzz92 7 Posted December 28, 2014 (edited) Modern AMD CPUs are only worth for for gaming when overclocked to 4.5GHz, sadly. Even than they struggle to compete with i5 CPUs in many games.I bought my AMD gaming laptop MSI GX60 only because I love AMD , but I didn't expect that their top laptop CPU would be so much inferior to Intel CPUs...Hey there. Sad to read it that u have issues with you rig. What FPS are you gaining in towns? Edited December 28, 2014 by blitzz92 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zak.preston@gmail.com 8 Posted December 28, 2014 Hey there. Sad to read it that u have issues with you rig. What FPS are you gaining in towns? 25-30 FPS in wilderness, 5-10 FPS in towns. AMD single-core performance is lackluster, and while you can overclock AMD desktop CPUs by 20-50% and catch up with lower i5 processors, most laptop CPUs aren't overclockable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitzz92 7 Posted December 28, 2014 25-30 FPS in wilderness, 5-10 FPS in towns. AMD single-core performance is lackluster, and while you can overclock AMD desktop CPUs by 20-50% and catch up with lower i5 processors, most laptop CPUs aren't overclockable.I see. Thanks for your feedback mate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChainReactor 922 Posted December 29, 2014 I use the FX8350 overclocked to 4.5Ghz and very rarely see fps drops. I know someones gonna mention intel cpus are better for gaming blah blah but some of us do more than game. Intel outruns AMD at this time in development because Intel actively stepped towards the devs and helped with integrating their architecture into the game at a very early stage in development. Also most Intel processors have a better single core performance compared to AMD, which is what the game needs right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sneakydudes 278 Posted December 29, 2014 Intel outruns AMD at this time in development because Intel actively stepped towards the devs and helped with integrating their architecture into the game at a very early stage in development. Also most Intel processors have a better single core performance compared to AMD, which is what the game needs right now.Intel really did approach the dayz team to optimize the game? I didn't read anywhere that intels platform ran better. I have an intel i7 and it runs the game nicely, you do feel the load when entering the city at max rendering. The video card is hard to tops 780ti SC edition. and I believe the game has been optimized with the latest dayz NVidia configuration. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChainReactor 922 Posted December 29, 2014 Intel really did approach the dayz team to optimize the game? Yes they did. I would love to quote you something, but when Rocket decided to delete his Reddit account, he also decided to delete the single biggest first-hand knowledge base about DayZ, which was his post history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thznutz 112 Posted December 29, 2014 I am an all AMD user. And I recommend an FX 8350. But DayZ is so poorly optimized that it will still not run like another game like Arma 3 would run with that processor. But I just upgraded to the 8350 and would personally go for it. EDIT: Off of personal experience DayZ CURRENTLY does not use both GPUs if you crossfire, or SLI. But that may be incorrect, but that is how it works for me because it does not use my 2nd GPU.this should fix ya up..... :thumbsup: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=205916418 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jfiles 439 Posted December 29, 2014 this should fix ya up..... :thumbsup: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=205916418Its for SLI im sure there is no difference but I will try later on tonight when I have time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thznutz 112 Posted December 29, 2014 Its for SLI im sure there is no difference but I will try later on tonight when I have timeshit....i'm an idiot man...says right there all blaring big that you are using AMD...the steps there are specifically for SLI, and use Nvidia's Inspector to make the changes....i'll see if i can find anything for Crossfire Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thznutz 112 Posted December 29, 2014 Its for SLI im sure there is no difference but I will try later on tonight when I have timeYou have to assign it to a profile. Add a profile for DayZ and in the Crossfire settings choose "Use a predefined profile" then search "Arma" and choose "Arma 2 OA" when it pops up. Click save and done. that should do it....i'll try to work on my reading/comprehension skills :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites