No force feeding unless victims are bound first

[SpardisJX 27]

My suggestion is simple:

 

Players cannot be force fed unless they are bound first (via handcuffs, rope, etc.)

 

 

They way it is right now, its just simply too easy for someone to come up to you and pour a bottle of disinfectant down your gullet with no resistance from your character.  In a real life situation, I cannot imagine it would ever be that easy unless the victim was bounded in some way first.

 

Anyway, that's my two-cents.  Feedback is always welcomed.

Edited June 18, 2014 by SpardisJX

[newguyzombie 122]

you are right, especially when your friends are drunk and try to troll you.

[gannon46 788]

My suggestion is simple:

 

Players cannot be force fed unless they are bound first (via handcuffs, rope, etc.)

 

 

They way it is right now, its just simply too easy for someone to come up to you and pour a bottle of disinfectant down your gullet with no resistance from your character.  In a real life situation, I cannot imagine it would ever be that easy unless the victim was bounded in some way first.

 

Anyway, that's my two-cents.  Feedback is always welcomed.

you get beans for the south park quote hahahahaha.

[Damnyourdeadman 1045]

While restrained/unconcious or surrundered,players should be able to be force fed anything without restrictions.

But,when the player does not have theese status effects,he should give his permission first.A text should appear saying:

 

"Accept force feeding?"

      Yes           No

 

Because,let's face it,the current system is far from realistic.

That is,having the fear of someone shoving bleach or rottnen kiwis down your throat when you are not looking.

 

Edit:Grammar

Edited June 18, 2014 by Damnyourdeadman

[SpardisJX 27]

While restrained/unconcious or surrundered,players should be able to be force fed anything without restrictions.

But,when the player does not have theese status effects,he should give his permission first.A text should appear saying:

 

"Accept force feeding?"

      Yes           No

 

Because,let's face it,the current system is far from realistic.

That is,having the fear of someone shoving bleach or rottnen kiwis down your throat when you are not looking.

 

Edit:Grammar

 

The only problem with that is its not really "force" feeding if they get to choose whether or not to accept it, lol

 

It would just be a lot simpler to not even have the option to do so until the victim is restrained first.

Edited June 17, 2014 by SpardisJX

[crizztl 23]

How about make it "offer" when not restrained and "force feed" when restrained?

 

You can decline an offer, but force is force.

[Rigor Mortis (DayZ) 141]

How about make it "offer" when not restrained and "force feed" when restrained?

 

You can decline an offer, but force is force.

Great idea. I hope they implement this.

[Lady Kyrah 1110]

Check how force feeding work on space station 13, if you do not "resist" (or cannot) you get force fed. Sometimes it's useful so medicine can be administred to an unconcious player. Otherwise ... well there is the odd case of getting clubbed and force fed death nettle.

 

My opinion? put a progress bar on both player's screen (or something else but it has to be more obvious than status text) and force feeding will fail if the play is concious and "move" (even if it's just a tap on W)

Edited June 18, 2014 by Lady Kyrah

[Jex 1104]

Force feeding unrestrained is stupid. Though force feeding your friends food makes no sound. This is good because in RL you can't hear me eating beans or opening fizzy drinks through walls.

Edited June 19, 2014 by Jexter

[dontliketopuke 0]

I ,for one, believe the ability to force feed anything is just a way to condone sadistic behavior .