SkrooLoose (DayZ)

Hey baby! How you doin'?

Clearly the time frame DayZ is set in makes it evident it's years after the outbreak. But naturally, due to playability, you have to have items (perishables) which are still present. It wouldn't make sense that these items are still around in real life, but this isn't real life. It's just a game.

Buildings are "crapholes"? Chernarus is "basically Afghanistan"? This video begs to differ.

Paint fades and peels in a couple weeks?

- fruit was waxed / irradiated - petrol had fuel saver additive added - cereal has preservatives - clothes are poly - paper had time to dry in between getting wet - pixies and fairies were watering the plants

Looks like way too many forum members have given you beans.

Locked doors sound decent in theory, but I can see how they'd end up being abused. People would end up trolling just as they did with barbwire. They'd go in, lock the doors, log out of the server and in to another so they could then leave the building.

I read this thread as server hopping for a quick gear-up after dying or a quick resupply after battle. I'm absolutely not ragging on anyone as everyone has the right to play the game as they see fit, so there is no "right way" to play. In my opinion it just seems wrong for a fresh spawn to be able to make a bee line from the coast to a specific cord and gear up. Or for a player to use one server to game on and another as their "storage". Being able to have a "stash" takes away from the survival aspect. It means a player can use less caution and not really care as much if they run through supplies or even get killed. They can simply run to their storage and pick right up where they left off. There's no "survival" in that. Again, I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers. I guess I'm just saying that the game would be different if everyone had to survive on what they can carry.

Yep yep yep.... Dog is the KING! But he better watch out because Donnie Baker and Kenny Powers are closing in on him.

Selfies with the zeds.

Because the live ones want you to stay and cuddle afterwards.

I want to say that your issue is because some games are very cpu-heavy, ArmA being one of them.

Then where were they pooping? Come on, finish the story. Don't leave us hanging.

Why is there so many little bitches who cry about other people's servers but won't rent their own?

Wanna be a playa? Start with some swag.

I think it just makes more sense that your "survivor" just washed up on the shore, hence spawning on the beach.

This sounds like one of those rare cases in which hacking is recommended. Meaning you've already lost ownership of your key, so while you still atleast have access to his (your) character, you should at least grab some obvious hack and go on a rampage before he does. Do something to get his account banned.

Really? A game which can draw in their attention and hold it for hours and hours on end; make them emotions such as sorrow, anger, fright, relief an such; to you that's a bad thing? Sound to me like it's a pretty fucking good game if it can affect a person like that.

You're saying if there were a "surrender" key then it would / could help cut down on kos by making robberies easier? ... because there IS a surrender key. Just like there's also a "lower weapon" key. The problem is many are just too lazy to bother learning how to actually play the game.

Considering how PLAYERS will always be present, why does that mean the zombies should be dumb-ed down? Why can't both PLAYERS and ZOMBIES be the main threat?

I want the same entourage following me that Benny Hill has around him. :)

No nothing? The devs started with the Take On Helicopters engine and are tweaking / expanding on it for DayZ stand alone as they see fit. T.O.H. engine being reworked.... you're saying that qualifies it as being a brand new engine which has been built from the ground up, newer than the A3 engine? If I do a motor swap and put a fuel injection in a '67 Mustang, does that make the '67 newer than the 2013's?

Been playing the ArmA series for a long time, so scripters hitting DayZ was no surprise. But what's nice is when this issue does arise, admins have the power to roll back the server. These days, once you find a good server which is well-admin'em, scripters are merely an inconvenience. Is it going to be the same when actual hackers hit the stand alone? Are the hacks going to be so obvious as the scripts currently are? Are hackers going to be quickly recognized like scripters are now?

Even if you don't like ArmA 3, why would you hope a DZ mod wouldn't be ported? That doesn't sound fair; you don't like it so no one else should have it? But, that being said, the movement seems a bit off to me, also. For me, it seems almost delayed, like how the movement in Killzone 2 was at first when released on the PS3.