zewoulfe 3 Posted June 21, 2014 hey guys i was just wondering, whats the difference between the folding stck and the wooden stock of the akm? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 21, 2014 The look. No silly +30 accuracy ? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhillyT 554 Posted June 21, 2014 Folding stock supposedly improves the accuracy. I like it well enough but in real life, folding stocks feel like crap to shoot with an AK or Saiga. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hells high 676 Posted June 22, 2014 I always go for the attachments I like the look of so I really don't pay attention to what they do (though I do keep a railed grip and flashlight on me for after dark). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotcakes 348 Posted June 22, 2014 ACHTUNGBOTH STOCKS GIVE THE SAME DISPERSION MODIFIER. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THE AESTHETIC. HAVING EITHER STOCK WILL NOSPREAD YOUR AKM. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 22, 2014 BOTH STOCKS GIVE THE SAME DISPERSION MODIFIER. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THE AESTHETIC. HAVING EITHER STOCK WILL NOSPREAD YOUR AKM. And if you have the railed handguard, you can remove your stock entirely. Rails are just that awesome. (by the way attaching a bipod is detrimental since this gun already has 0 spread) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hells high 676 Posted June 22, 2014 And if you have the railed handguard, you can remove your stock entirely. Rails are just that awesome.(by the way attaching a bipod is detrimental since this gun already has 0 spread) I eventually want taking the wood stock off or folding the wire stock (plz Bohemia :]) to work a bit like the sawn off, allowing you to stuff it vertically into a pack. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 22, 2014 (edited) Folding stock supposedly improves the accuracy. I like it well enough but in real life, folding stocks feel like crap to shoot with an AK or Saiga. I shot an underfolder akm ones it made my mouth bleed :/ I stupidly tried to get a cheek weld on one and the metal made my tooth slice the side of my cheek. So if anything it should decrease accuracy right ACHTUNGBOTH STOCKS GIVE THE SAME DISPERSION MODIFIER. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THE AESTHETIC. HAVING EITHER STOCK WILL NOSPREAD YOUR AKM. Awesome hopefully soon they remove the dispersion modifier in all the weapon attachments, bipod included and actually give the bipod utility by having it attach to the enviroment and reducing felt recoil when attached. Edited June 22, 2014 by gibonez Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 22, 2014 (edited) Awesome hopefully soon they remove the dispersion modifier in all the weapon attachments, bipod included and actually give the bipod utility by having it attach to the enviroment and reducing felt recoil when attached. It's not intentional, they just copied the properties of the M4 stocks. The M4 has 0.1 dispersion and the furniture removes 0.0440968*2 resulting in 0.0118064. The AKM has 0.008 dispersion and the stock removes 0.0440968 resulting in 0. The M4 is the only gun with such a high initial dispersion. The AKM dispersion (0.008) is closer to the the SKS (0.005). It would seem they intended it to have 0.008 dispersion and the stocks modifying it was a mistake. Edited June 22, 2014 by Gews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 22, 2014 It's not intentional, they just copied the properties of the M4 stocks. The M4 has 0.1 dispersion and the furniture removes 0.0440968*2 resulting in 0.0118064. The AKM has 0.008 dispersion and the stock removes 0.0440968 resulting in 0. The M4 is the only gun with such a high initial dispersion. The AKM dispersion (0.008) is closer to the the SKS (0.005). It would seem they intended it to have 0.008 dispersion and the stocks modifying it was a mistake. I understand. I am curious if the entire dispersion mechanic was a mistake and was never actually intentional. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-Gews- 7443 Posted June 22, 2014 I am curious if the entire dispersion mechanic was a mistake and was never actually intentional. Nah, you don't code a "dispersionModifier" system by mistake. From gamescom Reddit topic:Redditor 1: "Are those things going to have a practical effect or will they be completely cosmetic?"Chris Torchia: "sure, we can assign attributes to the attachments. What would be the use in attaching a suppressor to your gun if it didn't make it quieter? But I doubt we'll assign an effect to every single attachment. Its hard to quantify in practical terms the effect of replacing the standard A2-style plastic handguard with a Magpul-style one on the gun's performance." Rocket: "Only thing really is probably subtle changes to the dispersion values." Redditor 2: "No but putting free floated handguard would improve accuracy! Also standard handguards dont have rail sections where the magpuls do. Rocket if you ever need ideas for guns/gun related things check out /r/guns" Chris Torchia: "Yes, exactly. Free Float RIS wold have an impact but for those items that have negligible impact on the gun's characteristics, I wanted to present a functional choice. The Magpul-style handguard is a perfect example. It's not free float and doesn't allow you to attach the same number of attachments as a full metal RIS would but its kind of an intermediate 'level' in between the carbine length A2 handguard and the 4-way RIS, which could be used as the highest 'level' for more advanced attachment options." So it sounded to me like Torchia wasn't thinking of adding any significant dispersion modifier to Magpul, for instance, perhaps none at all ("But I doubt we'll assign an effect to every single attachment. Its hard to quantify in practical terms the effect of replacing the standard A2-style plastic handguard with a Magpul-style one on the gun's performance") but it sounded like Rocket was in favour of the idea ("Only thing really is probably subtle changes to the dispersion values"). Like I always say I don't care about dispersion, only that the values chosen are logical, "authentic", etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gibonez 3633 Posted June 22, 2014 Nah, you don't code a "dispersionModifier" system by mistake. From gamescom Reddit topic:Redditor 1: "Are those things going to have a practical effect or will they be completely cosmetic?"Chris Torchia: "sure, we can assign attributes to the attachments. What would be the use in attaching a suppressor to your gun if it didn't make it quieter? But I doubt we'll assign an effect to every single attachment. Its hard to quantify in practical terms the effect of replacing the standard A2-style plastic handguard with a Magpul-style one on the gun's performance." Rocket: "Only thing really is probably subtle changes to the dispersion values." Redditor 2: "No but putting free floated handguard would improve accuracy! Also standard handguards dont have rail sections where the magpuls do. Rocket if you ever need ideas for guns/gun related things check out /r/guns" Chris Torchia: "Yes, exactly. Free Float RIS wold have an impact but for those items that have negligible impact on the gun's characteristics, I wanted to present a functional choice. The Magpul-style handguard is a perfect example. It's not free float and doesn't allow you to attach the same number of attachments as a full metal RIS would but its kind of an intermediate 'level' in between the carbine length A2 handguard and the 4-way RIS, which could be used as the highest 'level' for more advanced attachment options." So it sounded to me like Torchia wasn't thinking of adding any significant dispersion modifier to Magpul, for instance, perhaps none at all ("But I doubt we'll assign an effect to every single attachment. Its hard to quantify in practical terms the effect of replacing the standard A2-style plastic handguard with a Magpul-style one on the gun's performance") but it sounded like Rocket was in favour of the idea ("Only thing really is probably subtle changes to the dispersion values"). Like I always say I don't care about dispersion, only that the values chosen are logical, "authentic", etc. Seems like Torchia knows his guns wonder where the unrealistic properties from weapons is coming from then. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotcakes 348 Posted June 22, 2014 And if you have the railed handguard, you can remove your stock entirely. Rails are just that awesome.(by the way attaching a bipod is detrimental since this gun already has 0 spread)I know. I have all the parts needed to do an SMG build on the AKM because I have all the parts. TOO BAD I CAN'T FIND AN AKM. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brumey 116 Posted June 22, 2014 I know. I have all the parts needed to do an SMG build on the AKM because I have all the parts. TOO BAD I CAN'T FIND AN AKM.barracks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotcakes 348 Posted June 22, 2014 barracks Went to Balota. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terminal_boy 860 Posted June 22, 2014 The very concept of a weapon attachment other than a suppressor affecting its ballistic properties make Baby Jesus cry. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terminal_boy 860 Posted June 22, 2014 Went to Balota. Everything that is wrong with weapons in the SA in one picture. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BadAsh (DayZ) 1513 Posted June 22, 2014 Went to Balota. Laser guns in game confirmed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daemonkid 493 Posted June 22, 2014 Everything that is wrong with weapons in the SA in one picture.Indeed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xpD1 4 Posted June 22, 2014 Would be nice to add this handguard, and remove the RIS and other improbable attachments. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotcakes 348 Posted June 22, 2014 Indeed. AK pistols are an actual thing. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daemonkid 493 Posted June 22, 2014 AK pistols are an actual thing.I know AK pistols are a thing. Just, the gun you have looks ugly as fuck. No stock, drum mag, PU scope, rail guard. Like, ew. The gun looks amazing with no stock and 30 round mags. Really cool like that, your picture is "Omfgwtfbbq" 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Munson_fry (DayZ) 312 Posted June 22, 2014 one thing is good about the akm the airfields a buzzing like a beehive nwaf is the new berzino at the moment. btw i had to kill for my akm :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frosti 2165 Posted June 22, 2014 one thing is good about the akm the airfields a buzzing like a beehive nwaf is the new berzino at the moment. btw i had to kill for my akm :P Unbelivable numbers of server hoppers on NWAF indeed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites