KarmaCoin 72 Posted March 4, 2014 (edited) I think it would be nice if the surrender animation made players lootable. That way I can check for weapons and items on surrendered players and remove them without killing or handcuffing the player. Because sometimes I want to rob you without shooting you first. And other times I just want to make sure you're not going to pull out a knife and stab me. I don't think I would ever group up with a random person without this feature. But with it, I might. Edited March 4, 2014 by KarmaCoin 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neobit 10 Posted March 4, 2014 Well, then the handcuffs will loose a lot of their charm. What about instead of lootable target inventory it would be accessible but you can't take anything until you ask for it, kill the player or handcuff him? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KarmaCoin 72 Posted March 4, 2014 Handcuffs disable a person from performing actions, surrendering doesn't. Also you can't force a person to surrender but you can forcibly handcuff them. So there would still be a difference. Also, I can frisk a person in real life without handcuffing them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xRann 126 Posted March 4, 2014 Would alleviate some tension on both ends if this were the case. You can't effective ensure your safety without handcuffs even with someone complying to orders. And it's not an unreasonable request upon bumping into someone and frisking rather than handcuffing and starting a doom clock in that person's head as to when and how you're going to finish them off even if you have no intent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damnyourdeadman 1045 Posted March 4, 2014 Yes,preety neat idea and realisticlly supported.We should totally have it ingame.It's preety stupid in the moment,for the only way to loot someone is by cuffing him/her.That would make things easier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KarmaCoin 72 Posted March 4, 2014 Would alleviate some tension on both ends if this were the case. You can't effective ensure your safety without handcuffs even with someone complying to orders. And it's not an unreasonable request upon bumping into someone and frisking rather than handcuffing and starting a doom clock in that person's head as to when and how you're going to finish them off even if you have no intent. I totally agree. I think I would actually kill less unarmed people if I could frisk them like this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hozzdutch 49 Posted March 4, 2014 yes i like this idea. a frisking while surrendered is a lot less offensive than handcuffing tooMaybe to improve on the idea, a frisk search only reveals any kind of weapon that can be removed.After all, you're doing this to remain safe, you're not not a bandit looking to steal all their gear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KarmaCoin 72 Posted March 4, 2014 yes i like this idea. a frisking while surrendered is a lot less offensive than handcuffing tooMaybe to improve on the idea, a frisk search only reveals any kind of weapon that can be removed.After all, you're doing this to remain safe, you're not not a bandit looking to steal all their gear. I am a bandit looking to steal gear. I just don't think I need to kill you to get it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIC 1050 Posted March 4, 2014 I agree to this. Very good suggestion :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ra91111 52 Posted March 4, 2014 i agree too , there should be a way to quickly search a person which has his hands up - a body search animation and an indicator that tells you if the person is armed /has hidden wapons . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites