SvU_Saber 21 Posted December 20, 2013 10ml doesn't seem right to me. 1ltr would make more sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianramos 47 Posted December 20, 2013 I think there's a 0 missing, like 100ml, it would make more sense I guess... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whatup2003 67 Posted December 20, 2013 100ml would still be too little. From the look it's more like 700ml-1L. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mos1ey 6301 Posted December 20, 2013 10ml is more like a syringe. I'm sure it will be addressed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blitz 64 Posted December 20, 2013 (edited) 100ml would still be too little. From the look it's more like 700ml-1L. Conspiracy theory Spring water lobbiest have been looking to milk us out of more money, but putting the price up would be a PR nightmare in these hard times, so instead they have been slowly reducing the size of the bottles for years. It is only now in the Zombie apocalypse that we finally see their dastardly plan. Edited December 20, 2013 by -seraphine- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Septimus 9 Posted December 20, 2013 I enjoy the 2 teaspoon sized bottles myself, I suggest that you get used to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
