how is my gameplay still not smooth?

[zzmik3yzz 1]

ino this game is buggy n that but surely i should be able to run it?

i have tried lowering settings to lowest, gpumaxframes ahead=1, ram disk, everythign wtf?? my dayz can i runit.com: http://gyazo.com/fa6f42da30db8e78877ba8f185713c3b

system specs:

cpu: i3 3220 3.3ghz

gpu: amd 6770 1gb

mobo: asrock b75m

ram: 4gb 1600mhz cosair

psu: 500w cosair builder series

hdd: 1tb 5900rpm, sata 2

passes for recommended on all games?

my fps seems to be dropping day by day?

could this be because of my case cooling its pretty bad my cpu@max is like 55c

my gpu: 36c at idle, 60c max load,

my hdd is cool my ram has a vent next to it im really confused when i play mw3 my fps is locked at 91 but doesnt feel smooth? please help new system btw

[AmberHelios 2071]

my guess would be your cpu

[zzmik3yzz 1]

it passes for recommended? nothing to do with cpu

[AmberHelios 2071]

why ask then if your not gonna accept it i wouldn't play on less then a proper quad core deffo not a threaded dual core

Edited January 3, 2013 by AmberHelios

[zzmik3yzz 1]

the i3 beats most amd quad cores :S its just as good as the 965 phenom? so i can tell you its not the processor

[sharx69@gmail.com 10]

cpu and hdd is your major limitations. arma also loves ram, so 8 gb will increase perfomance. like above stated a proper quad is 'mandatory'. an ssd would resolve issues regarding sudden dips in the frames :)

[sharx69@gmail.com 10]

Yes, the Intel cpu beats AMD in most tests. However most of these are single-threaded and intel is the king of single threading. however Arma is heavily multithreaded. This gives Amd an advantage, since they sell true quads for a lot less than intel demands :)

[sharx69@gmail.com 10]

Last little note. Check your application setting regarding video settings. look at post process level and AA, decreasing these parameters gives a nice performance boost. also object detail adjustment will help...