kichilron

That video is 3 (in words THREE!) years old. Just download it from Steam. It's available under the name "ARMA 2: DayZ Mod".

Weell. You really shouldn't try to play any game with 4GB of RAM, to be honest.

1.: I'm not. I was just making a point of actually reporting rather than just talking about it. 2.: This is from half a year ago without adding anything new to the table. Locked

Do not reopen a topic when it has been closed by Staff. There are no server files for public. Only hosting available is through GSP's. Merged

Internetspeed is not the same as latency / ping nor is it an indicator whether you temporarily lost connection. Even if you're on Teamspeak, you'll not notice, as TS is pretty good at handling that, whil DayZ has trouble combating that. Nontheless: what are the specs of your computer? SSD / HDD? RAM?

Almost there.... http://forums.dayzgame.com/index.php?/topic/225879-stable-branch-057-discussion/

First - to start: Don't use DayZCommander anymore, it'll break your game and is obsolete. Hasn't been updated in well over a year. DayZ Mod is on Steam - get it there and make sure everything's being updated through that. That way you'll have a lot less errors on your side.

Please do explain how you spent 60 pounds on a 25 pound game?

Whenever the game starts in Windowed Mode, press "ALT+ENTER" to switch to fullscreen.

If you have not seen it yet regarding persistence: http://forums.dayzgame.com/index.php?/topic/225863-eugen-harton-on-twitter-for-those-that-are-asking-yes-zombies-are-in-stable-yes-animals-are-in-stable-yes-persistence-for-vehicles/

Read before you post applies to you more than to many other people. Merged. To all the people complaining about the lack of certain features in certain builds: it was disclosed on many occasions that there will be patches removing certain features to be able to test the impact on performance and whatnot. I guess it's the time again to remind you, that you pressed "I UNDERSTAND!"

If that's the quality of content you came here to create, don't bother. A patch is a good thing and taking the time for it is necessary. If you can't comprehend that, please don't complain about it.

Usually means that somethign big is coming:

Patience isn't the strong suit of people these days, eh? Maintenance usually only has a starting point and an open end. The servers will come back.

if (getPlayerName == "Hicks_206") then { player addMagazine "8Rnd_9x18_Makarov";};You're welcome!

Criticism is allowed. Trolling, however, isn't. And what you're doing is not in any way reasonable. To have a discussion there needs to be a certain degree of unterstanding the other sides involved. You don't even bother with any of that. Consider this your last warning. If you don't want to engage in a discussion, this is not the place for you.

If you don't understand the basics it's rather tedious discussing how it works.

There was an update recently. Did you make sure you're trying to join a server that is running the same version as you are?

As a matter of fact I know one or two things about game development. And you have just outed yourself as the one that's never read anything on this Forum ever. It's literally every other thread and any member that's been here for over a week could reiterate it for you: First you add content, then you fix bugs. If you add content you'll inevitably break things, no point in optimising when you're adding elements.

If you're going around saying these things don't be surprised if there's a backlash.

Clearly you don't know anything game development then. Are you suggesting optimisation happens first - before adding more survival-elements to a survival game? If you are serious about that, I suggest you speak no further and leave immediately before you're being laughed at.

3 and a quarter. Poor chap had to give a leg and an arm for this. Why?

Alright, so here we go: I have an FX-8350 massively overclocked and watercooled and my performance is just fine. A lot of people are doing it wrong by lowering their graphics-settings - but by doing that they're offloading their GPU and thus the CPU has to handle more. I am currently running DayZ at maximum resolution (and 200% overscaled) on a 21:9 monitor with my FX-8350 and a 7970. GPU is @ 100% and I get decent frames (everywhere). People that are still claiming that DayZ only utilizes 1 core live in 2012 and have picked up what others said on the interwebs. Performance is totally fine if you spend more than the average attentionspan of a gamer (12 seconds) to optimise your settings. The game has also been optimised a lot recently. If one's not as thick as a tree (or trolling) one would have noticed. Now - I have a disclosure to make: I bought this setup with productivity in mind and I will be switching soon enough. I am not a video-guy - but I have other things that I'm doing with my computer that require heavy multitasking. This does also mean that my PC is under heavy load pretty much all of the time. This lead me to a decision I am currently saving up to. I will keep my 8350 and a cheap-ass GPU that can run my 4 screen setup for productivity and I will get myself another PC (I will be up to 4 @ my desk then) that'll run a 4690K and a GPU (until I get a new one I shall still be sporting my 7970). The Intel-based PC will only run a single screen for gaming, whilst I can still have my main rig running my productivity-workload. This'll not happen for about another month or so, because of different things I have going on, so I'll not have much time anyway. But in 1 month I will be able to tell you with 100% safety whether it's worth switchting platforms or not.

I read "celebrities" and was excited that I was going to get my face in the game as a Zombie.

I did not know that. Not bad.