KWilt

While I can understand, I can't exactly forgive you. Though, your friend's a fucking prick for up-and-abandoning you. I'd ditch him if that's how it's gonna play out.

You actually have a clock for the servers. You have a fucking time function so I don't have to spend half an hour jumping around servers to find one that's daylight. You are a god.

You know people would just set them up in the most obscure places, too. Like in the middle of a damn forest.

Are you gonna be the one to put the foliage, buildings, and everything else in for us? If you will, sure. I'm sure rocket will get right on it.

1: Yes 2: If the situation pertains, yes 3: If I feel that the person is going to endanger my survival

O...kay? You got a video to go with that, or are you showcasing your whole channel off of that statement altogether?

I don't think that would change anything at all. It's not like he's crying that he died.

The 5 might actually be 4.6xx and the 9 might be 9.4xx, so the damage might be marginally too low to two-shot something. That's about all I can come up with.

Huh. Not sure what you're talking about. Sorry I can't help.

You should run around, just yelling 'WOOF WOOF MOTHERFUCKER' into your mic. That'll draw eyes.

and you're a tester. Chances are, every long, hard hour you put into this game a official launch will be completely worthless. If you don't like it, don't play.

Before Half Life 3. I can guarantee that.

Why did you run, Crystal?! Why?! What would've you guys have done if he hadn't've run?

And until you find one (which relies entirely on RNG) the zombies are OP in regards to DPS ratios. Which is exactly what I said. That's a planned change' date=' I've heard. So the point there is moot. [hr'] Which is... exactly what I said in the OP? See above.

Where you're standing. Seriously. As in, right after you connect and it goes through the loading and everything? That's right in front of you. (Although, sometimes, I see the debug plains for some reason.)

You're the one asking for the faulty system. There aren't faults in the system as is. All of the reactions are completely on the actions of the players, not the actions forced by the computer. They have no outside influences based on appearance or action that causes anyone to shoot at that player on a character-by-character basis that a player doesn't choose. If a bandit wants to act genuinely kind and then stab you in the back after they have your hand in pact, they can do that entirely with how they speak and how they act. Any wavering is based on a survivor's opinion on their actions, not their outside appearances that were place on them by the system, simply because that's how the game thinks they'd act. In essence, the system is forcing you into a role. Which would pretty much kill the immersion for me. (Not simply because you're changing a skin, but because the game thinks you would instantly want to look like that, thus negating any use of subterfuge to out-trick the other survivors; this kills what I feel is a very important part of the social game in DayZ.)

Still don't like these skin ideas. It's just shifting the problem, not getting rid of it. Skins just make you stand out in this game, and it's much easier if we can choose what we want to look like when we affiliate ourselves. And hell, even if they're a vigilante, that doesn't mean they don't kill survivors. They might just kill everybody they come across. Not perfect, but at least this idea doesn't mark people using self-defense as the scum of the earth. (Also, I hope you realize just how silly it is to say that all carebears hook up. They'd start turning on each other in such a large group faster than you can say 'beans'.)

He does make a valid argument. Don't see why we can't just stick to calling it D/Cing, rather than give a term dual meaning where it doesn't need one.