AustinHyx

Yea on DayZ mod, but on standalone I get 30-40. And on ArmA 3 I get 60 ish,

Considering ArmA 2 has a HORRIBLE engine and I get 60 to 80 frames on it....yes. Im not complaining, I would rather have more, especially sense it seems I should be.

My friend has a a VERY good PC, I assume he gets 120 but he has said before that he gets around 90ish. I dont play CoD on PC, but I do play BF. Its hard to ignore something that changes the atmosphere.

http://gyazo.com/2ced4418b3af618f3cab2808475789db ^^^ Here's my current settings, I have already tried all the optimization tutorials that I could find, thats why I have resorted to here. I know its alpha but If my friends get 120 FPS and I get 40 then I know its not just the game.

I bought DayZ SA a week or so after it was put on the market, I have always had a love hate relationship with DayZ Mod, and standalone is not helping it one bit. For what ever reason I have FPS lower then what I would expect. My hardware is: GPU: GTX 650 Ti Boost SC Edition CPU: AMD 4350 Vishera 4.1 Ghz Quad Core RAM: 8GB G Skill DDR3 SDRAM OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Sp1 I use System Rquirments Lab quite often to find out wether a game can run decent on my PC. I am aware that it can be wrong, but with the case of DayZ it gives me this http://gyazo.com/7da78a60cf720538847183df5d93817b Im not sure if 30 to 40 FPS in open areas and in fields is what SRL considers above the recommended hardware performance is normal, or if standalone just runs that way on certain pieces of hardware. If someone can give me some information on what mgiht be my issue i would appreciate it greatly. I have searched all over and tried all the changes and fixes and hasn't changed much, other then a few extra frames.