General Zod

Or on you.

Yes at some point in future we will have russian guns, but they add another american gun before long awaited Dragunov that's just not cool. As for out of place, chernarus is rather poor by the look of "towns" so we wouldn't be exactly finding expensive guns such as Blaze 95 or many imported weapons, because of the cost of importing guns. We should have more guns like CR527, your medium tier hunting guns, with fixed magnification scope. Instead we are going towards mostly military armament.

I see what you did there.

Get the wrong plant : My ass is burning.

Word of the day exaggerationɪɡˌzadʒəˈreɪʃ(ə)n/noun a statement that represents something as better or worse than it really is. In this case the latter (worse).

I agree with Stukov. Murica or murica based : M4 Amphibia 1911 Magnum Sporter Longhorn and M1 garand is coming Zi germany Mp5 B95 p1 Czech republic CR527 CR75 (made in cherno but based on Czech gun) Belgium / murica FNX45 Poland Rak Russian guns. Mosin SKS AKM Makarov IZHS AK101 is an export version so this is debatable. We have more murican guns than any other type.

That is one misleading title.

Great idea especially with how broken (non existent) loot re spawn and persistence are.

You don't need kids for that. A lot of players you'd expect to be mature will embrace scat griefing.

Well you guys wanted something to make characters life valuable. This is it. @Awruk If that atrocity is a woman, I'm an actual Kryptonian.

Yes server hoppers are always being executed either by fellow server hoppers or by survivors who find them.

Higher tier civilian weapons should be modern hunting rifles with scope compatibility (they need to add a hunting scope with fixed magnification) not some ancient rifle, that is about the same as SKS but with bigger bullets.

Been there man.

I'd like to see that. Good for you. If you would read this forum, there is a tonne of complaining that there is not enough role playing. One of the reasons being lack of means to do so. Oh I don't know, post your gear gallery ? Where most screens show guys dressed and equipped like spetsnaz or navy seals. People put hours into hunting down heli crash sites to get full pimped out M4s is that realistic ? No I don't it will make it realistic, because in real life those spray paints would be there and even that small % of people could use them. It would only make it less realistic for for people obsessed with 100% survival useful gear only. So from a survival point of view, yes less realistic, form a real life point of view, more realistic. Any how I think this the part were further discussion is pointless. All we can do is agree to disagree and not waste time. At least that's what I'm going to do.

Or maybe a group of killers / bandits want to get their gear bright to stand out ? To indicate danger, to show off. All you talk about is surviving from a point of a single normal guy. And yet you accuse of not looking at things from a different perspective. On one hand you people bitch about KoS without interaction day in and day out. But when someone suggest something that would enhance role playing you instantly shoot it down with "unrealistic" arguments. Is the fact that 90% of people running around with assault rifle and with military grade clothes realistic ? No it's not, but I don't see you arguing to reduce military gear. Because you like it. And even if it isn't 100% realistic, it would bring in some variation into the game, which is as important as realism. Otherwise people get bored and leave.

You still failed to tell me what bad it will do.

See ? This is what you get for trying to be nice in this game.

Beans for going out with dignity.

Because I am not a selfish jerk. Just because I don't use sporster or a double barrel doesn't mean I think it should not be in game. And where the fuck did the "do not add realistic things" came from ? I am all for realism, and part of realism is there will be various colour spray paints lying around, whether you use them is up to you, but they are there nonetheless. And be careful with your realism because it will also mean that breaking a leg = several weeks of limping around. Getting shot in the stomach ? Stomach content spills into abdominal cavity = sepsis = slow, painful death. Shot in the chest = collapsed lung = only half oxygen for you nor more running. Should we keep going with the hyper realism ? Imagine how lethal injuries will be with no doctors around. You don't know what people would do in case of an apocalypse because there hasn't been one. Your point of view is that if your not going to use something, no one else will and therefore it should not be added. So yes I refuse to look at things from that point, because I know not everyone plays like I do. Should I write this down for you in crayons ?

Do you even know what a hypocrite is ? I don't need to look at it from your perspective, your perspective is boring, based on - " I wouldn't do that and there no one will do that, it's unrealistic" who are to speak for others ? And yes I support that, why not. Do you thing in apocalypse people would run to a town and shoot at each other ? (berezino much ?) So you say that in a world of apocalypse everyone would do the same thing you do in DayZ ? Run to military base and get full cammo, assault rifle and 500 bullets ?

Following this logic lets remove ability to remove clothes and run around in underwear. Not only it removes the tacti cool camouflage effect. But also makes you freeze and take more damage. REMOVE IT NOW !!!1!!111!1 But no once forces you to do it. If others want to become bright and visible why not let them ? You can keep your core mechanics of surviving, and at the same time let others not do that. Go ahead keep your camouflage, and do only thing that let you survive, but let others do things they want. Maybe they get bored with pure survival and want to do some shenanigans, let them do it.

Why does it have to be for the sole purpose of survival and improving "core mechanics". Why not add thing for shits and giggles ? It just might make someone's day in this fucking grim ruthless world to slap on some colour onto their gear. So that they can distinguish themselves from other instead of everyone looking like a freaking soldier wearing cammo ? For example cattle prods They are not capable of knocking people out like teaser, so what survival purpose they serve? As for raincoat, if devs were so obsessed with pure survival benefiting items that do not stand out they would add green reincoat, instead we have bright yellow and techo orange.

No you're far worse, you're an idiot who keeps on saying that things that are tactci cool survial should not be in game. Following your logc lets remove bright clothes (fuck the bright yellow raincoat in particular) But you're arguments are based on one meaningless thing : You wouldn't use them. So what there is a lot of people who would. Not to mention that people already said that your beloved camouflage colours are USELESS in towns.

And you know that based on all those zombie apocalypses that you survived in the past ?

They are pretty underground now.