3rdparty

Or Chernarus Narco Tanks to the more observant, and less tired OPs :S This is what i hope for, in terms of vehicle mods when DayZ is standalone. Maybe a lil too hopeful. https://www.google.c...XGa-20QWV4s2GBw These are pictures of vehicles customised by mexican drug cartels used for fighting rival gangs and the state :S Not intentionally envoking the completely grim set of circumstances going on in mexico for the sake of a game suggestion. But if narco traffickers are building these things and going up against the military and police in em, says something about human potential :S Suggestion: Uber mod your vehicles into apocalyptic zombie mowing mad max machines.

this might be uber excessive but ive seen plenty of pics of peeps whove modified their vehicles for defense below showing a scary example of which wouldnt wanna jack this car :S

Oooh this thread got ruined by off-topic sensitivities. And no to mention a poor topic title :( Regardless anyone else got thoughts on this? I cannot believe peeps wouldnt want to mod their vehicles in this fashion, and seems completely plausible for the DayZ environment.

Meh, as aggressive as your posts are (that ive seen), this is all very true. Only found one other thread directly discussing removing all sniper rifles though(http://dayzmod.com/forum/index.php?/topic/20330-snipes-nvgs-and-silenced-weapons-should-b-removed/page__hl__%2Bremove+%2Bsniper) so I wont blanket bomb the thread with 1300 varieties of the word no (http://en.wikipedia....native_speakers :). But this is a big NO NO. Sniper Rifles are cool.

I love any idea striding towards groups organizing permafixtures/bases. The idea of this item inacting a "safe-zone" for the camp is pretty cool, but i see a couple of problems with it. Friendly groups/players, will wanna log in/out inside that radius. Players logging in will essentially be given a unfair advantage in knowing the camp is there. (i know the noise and size of the thing will be a dead give away anyway, but itd be nice to know there wasnt this extra con before a player even entered the game. Groups using the radius as an exploit like previously mentioned, i.e spawning players in the sea, or placing them in such a way that theres only a few guaranteed spawn point they can aim their weapons at. If there was someway to "approve" certain players to be able to log within the radius, remove any warning that a camp is nearby and instead just spawn them at the radius (tis the risk ye should take if your server hopping and not staying on the same one XD). Doesnt matter anyway, surely the noise of the generator should be a big enough give away when they log in.

Also im not to sure about your second suggestion, not in terms of being critical, jsut that i dont understand how that works?

Ok yea fair enough, ive been using this for forum for over a month now and yes there is incredibly repetitive topics. But ffs you dont belittle and attack someone new, (and lets be honest its always the newcommers) who tries to post up an idea with enthusiasm, genuine desire to contribute, only for it to be castrated by "bohemia hipsters" (rockets words! i prefer rocket vanguard) leaving them feeling impotent towards any contribution they wanna make towards this game. As much as I love what Rocket has done, he didnt think of it first, guess what the hundreds of thousands of peeps who joined this like wild fire have been thinking about it for years, getting messy with mates describing the perfect zombie game, finding it, rushing with joy and excitement to the forums to get involved, only to find a bunch of leather skinned rocket reptiles wishing to replenish their cold blood. Sorry i dont mind telling peeps "this has been suggested before but i like dislike your idea...", but if you havnt got the time jsut ignore it. Dont chase em down and humiliate them. Its pathetic.

Err soo? Whats that gotta do with telling "experienced" posters not to be such unnecessarily aggressive wankers?

Well, i wrote that while your comment wasnt even present on my screen, so wasn't directing at you, if you scroll back through the thread youll see the amount of comments that assume comment 3 was "in-game" But seeing as youve responded. Nothing about your point 3, suggests your talking about the forum. Everything suggests, your talking about in-game. The OP is specifically talking about the DayZ forum community. And i aint speaking almighty at all, im actually ranting about the peeps who DO consider themselves almighty and feel they have the right to aggressively dismiss any suggestion because it wasnt in rockets ten commandments, or because theyve "seen this thread before". They are the real trolls.

Because even the most frequent posters on here are trolls themselves and dont even know it, they find repetitive threads to belittle rather than even engaging peeps to see if it develops anywhere new.

The OP in point 3 speaking about the DayZ forum community, not the in game peeps you come across. You know who you are, The Rocket Vanguard! who roam this forum seeking to humiliate newcomers? Who somehow think they are not trolls themselves? who somehow think they are doing this game and rocket justice? who somehow think they are coming across as rationale logical game loyal fans, rather than epic grand canyon cunts. Whats worse is most of the time they dont even suggest anything themselves. They just literally sit their browsing, waiting to find a comment to belittle, then complain about time wasting?!?!?! They are the fucking trolls! Also the amount of you peeps who are mistaking point 3 for being "in game" rather than "on the forum" is making me ashamed of y'all.

Did a quick search and i found 1 subject related to complete removal of sniper rifles. Considering the uber repetition in this forum, to me, this is a genuine suggestion, so worry not about the peeps posting carebear comments or aggressive dismissals. For they only go on this forum to humiliate peeps in order to bolster their self esteem. Err personally noo matey, ive seen a few threads which are debating the OTT nature of some of the rifles, but complete removal? noo i dont think so. + Not everyone shoots on sight, but they may not make their presence known either XD

read and join in XD this thread is a good developing one http://dayzmod.com/forum/index.php?/topic/5716-power-plants-electric-grid-and-generators-v-33/page__hl__electric

1. Yea methinks the gaming industry is a very exploitative trade, which overworks understaffed developers. I hear that even rocket is in debates with Bohemia about whether DayZ will even be built on their engine (an example of profiteering whores trying to control the game) 2. I am neither a graphically aesthetic whore, and tbh the clunky movement dont bother me so much knowing its at this stage of development. What ruins the immersion for me, is when a zed comes running at you screaming and growling, and you shoot it for a "urgh" sound to come out. Thats a real anti climax. 3. I completely agree, the rocket vanguard can be far more annoying then even trolls. I dont mind the idea of a more experienced poster, telling new members "this has been suggested before but i like/dislike your idea for...", you know actually nursing new peeps into how it works, rather then ripping them to shreds for not being as passionate as them. Tbh if theyre giving an idea amongst the persecuting commentary I'll respond to that, if they're being unnecessarily aggressive or patronising because you ruined their browsing time, just tell them to return to the warmth and comfort of rockets arsehole. Which is another good point, my greatest fear is that all this rocket brown nosing from the rocket vanguard will inflate the poor mans ego to the point he is no longer bareable to the average human being. Please Rocket Vanguard, no one wants to see him do a Jason Russell

yea i think its a good idea, and tbh i think this would definitely reduce ghosting. However i dont think it would resolve peeps server hoping for loot, as it only takes a minute or so to run through a building too see if what your after is there. Maybe if there was timer increase on entering servers, if youve entered X many servers in Y amount of time. But personally ghosting is the worst out of these exploits so id like to see that dealt with first.

1. If you linger too long 2. If you linger too long 3. Doubt itll be like that forever. 4. If you linger too long 5. Meh 6. Your choice, personally noooo. DOubt many peeps realise that not everyone shoots on sight, but they may not make their presence known either XD Personally, take it slow, be observant, keep on the move XD

+1

A NEW ONE!!

and yea im kinda undecided, atm i kinda feel it is an exploit but only because of limitations with representating ALL the items a building could hold. And in a way i think meta gaming is a kinda exploit, but its an unvoidable one. Dunno if there is any solution to that.

never stated it as fact, of course it is my opinion, its a fucking suggestion forum! I keep forgetting how passionate the rocket vangaurd is on semantics, and i said your pussyfooting around pretentious commentry, dont try and patronise me. "ohh i would enjoy you finding a link for that, oohh please enlighten us", no you enjoy trying to belittle people who are not as keen as you, you tit.

Well as i mentioned to someone before, offensive is probably the wrong word, sensitive. Seeing as peeps from all ages are being massacred in horrific ways, wouldnt be suprised if someone whos been affected browses these forums. I guess its like along the same lines of saying, "holocaust, of course, was a terrible event, but look at them fucking Panzers bruuuv!!" I think it could be seen as offensive just cuz a very upsetting issue was slightly brought to the surface for the sake of saying, look at these amazing vehicles!!! But again, i do stand by it, cuz i am well read into it, and i didnt wanna just paste up pics of every other apocalypse film that peeps have seen.

XD

lol and if ye light a fire down there, there could be a percentage chance it ignites a leaking methane pocket and blows you all up XD

lol i expect no one has properly engaged ye with this unfortunate problem before? Jesus that sucks man, but ney be fool hearted. Maaaan i remember talking for hours with mates of mine 10 YEARS AGO about ze ultimate zombie survival game. We had always envisaged something that was fps but mostly strategic based, in the same way Dungeon Keeper dealt with fps but in an open enviornment, not level based. Start off as a survivor, meet up with fellow ones with different backgrounds/skills contributions. Progress into strategy mode where ye can begin to rebuild civilization, wage war or connect with other communities, or take your people mobile on a kill every zed campaign. The only reason this game exploded from absolute nowhere is because MANY people have envisaged this ultimate game of games. There is a terrible fantastic mixture of ideas, naivety, creativity, trolls, blossoming discussions, trolls-with-honor and the rocket vanguard! (who, i have to admit, are sometimes as annoying as trolls) on this forum, who all sometimes forget that many peeps have been thinking of an immersive zombie game for TIIIME! Worry not though matey, ye will one day get ze resources together for a new comp, think towards arma 3, and considering their staff limitations, i bet ye'll be on before its in beta, ye can even send me a message and link up with some friendly players. Looook at the profile pic, ill show you wonders!

:) well it isnt is it really, to be honest i think a better word would be sensitive. Seen a couple of threads go off topic on sensitive issues. But yea i think it would be kinda cool, especially if shooting from vehicles is introduced as ive seen petetioned for before on the forums. Also provides good protection for small groups in a server with other established settlements.