Dianeces

It isn't a problem, and therefore requires no solution.

Lol. OP is not too bright. The "free hack" from YouTube replaced his CD key with a banned one and stole his to sell. Do you people not read battleye.com?

Of course, were you to take two seconds to think about those results, you'd realise that the vast majority of those come from hackers. And that because of this, they are significantly over-represented.

Defibrillator.

Okay. Finally figured out why you would post this and what your problem was. You are trying to balance DayZ. Rocket has explicitly said that DayZ is not supposed to be balanced. Not all options are, or even ought to be, equally valid. It is possible to play at night only using flares, chem lights and flashlights. That is a method, and a valid one; another, more valid method of playing at night is to use NVGs for those fortunate enough to have them. They allow you to see as well as avoid exposing yourself. That this is "unfair" to those without is of no concern because it isn't supposed to be fair in the first place. You have built up this fantasy land notion that everybody should be on equal footing simply because you don't think it fits. Your sole reason for requesting this change is because you think it's unfair; by all means, feel free to come up with other reasons to propose this, but be aware that any sort of reason that references balacing is invalid.

The street signs are written with Cyrillic characters because the fictional country of Chernarus is a former Soviet Socialist Republic. The "ocean" is actually a river in real life. The terrain in Chernarus is analogous to some real terrain within the Czech Republic. If I remember, I'll post a link when I get home from work showing this. :derpatalk:

I don't get how you know it's his mod, but you're still acting like his vision isn't the final say in what happens.

He's trying to tell you that it wasn't an admin but rather a hacker without making you feel dumb.

This is an example of someone who doesn't know what they are talking about trying to sound smart. I would recommend against listening to him. (For the record' date=' the ratio between weapons and NVGs in most first world armies is right around 1:1, since as it turns out seeing the target is the first step towards being able to shoot the target. NVGs really aren't as expensive or uncommon as people seem to think.) [/quote'] Oh really? Really. Most (Western) European armies will undoubtedly have NVGs for the majority of soldiers. In fact, any army which can afford MBTs and helicopters can also afford to issue out NVGs. The biggest hurdle in that instance (assuming you have no organic NVG manufacturing capabilities within your own country) would be in finding someone to sell you sufficient quantities of their NVGs. They are not some sort of magical device that noone has. The whole world watched the First Gulf War and saw what happens when one side can see and operate in the dark and the other can't. And contrary to popular belief, people are not that dumb. I will grant that the Chernarussian army would likely not have one per soldier, but that also does not mean that the current paucity is accurate either.

This is an example of someone who doesn't know what they are talking about trying to sound smart. I would recommend against listening to him. (For the record, the ratio between weapons and NVGs in most first world armies is right around 1:1, since as it turns out seeing the target is the first step towards being able to shoot the target. NVGs really aren't as expensive or uncommon as people seem to think.)

Just quoting this before idiot here has a chance to realize what he's done and removes it.