prix

I guess the idea comes from development times.

I'll just let you guys carry on licking each others balls. This is too lame for me.

Fanboy excuses. If he can't use numbers with decimal points I'm doubting he could count how many bullets he had left in mosin / gun.

You know that G-Sync will require special hardware in the monitor. So you will need too get a new monitor for G-Sync, and since the hardware is in the monitor AMD will be able too use G-Sync aswell. Tho, AMD cards of newer generations all have built in support for variable refresh rate. Wich is just what G-Sync does. I'm guessing Nvidia cards do not have this, thats why it's a hardware solution, but will also be backwards compatible etc working with all cards when the new hardware is in the screen. So, no. G-Sync will not make any difference what so ever.

000000000000000000.1% is the same as 0.1% Since 0000000000000 is not less than 0. If you type 0.000000001% that is less than 000000000000000000000000000000.1% You with me mister elite pro master? Anyway, i think this story is 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% true.

Both me and Terminal Boy showed you logs. I would give you a video, but recording in 60 FPS @ 2560x1440 will eat up my disk like a beast, and my 1 MBit/s upload line will be busy for a year uploading that to youtube. And, since this was not about "I have 60 FPS while recording" there is no point.

But that is not in Cherno :) I know you saw my FPS in the other thread where that little rat didn't think you could get 60 FPS in the wild. I'm not saying that. You can get stable 60 FPS in wilderness. No doubt, i have it. But now it was in Cherno. Where you can't get 60 FPS. And btw, I know where the locations are. Been playing the mod for too long. And, since I saw your hardware in that other thread aswell. And It's equal too mine in ways. I know you can't run throu cherno with 60 FPS stable. So lets just drop it. Thanks for sharing data for wilderness tho :)

FRAPS log from running around in wilderness: 2014-01-05 15:45:47 - DayZ (Very Low @ 2560x1440)Frames: 4568 - Time: 55078ms - Avg: 82.937 - Min: 75 - Max: 91 2014-01-05 15:47:54 - DayZ (High Texture quality and High Terrain + Objects @ 2560x1440)Frames: 10005 - Time: 110296ms - Avg: 90.710 - Min: 68 - Max: 215 http://forums.dayzgame.com/index.php?/topic/159972-dayz-amd-vs-intel/?p=1627175 Oh, and since you seam so curious. Looking at ground: 252 FPS Looking at sky: 264 FPS

I'm serious aswell. But yes, I get 60 FPS in the wild. Not in a city tho. Intel Core I5 3570K, SSD disk, 16 GB ram, crossfire R9 290 4gb. Stop trolling

What he means is "My computer is exactly like yours and I haven't checked my FPS but I'm guessing I have 60 FPS (40 in reality) and in Cherno 40 (15 in reality)."

Stop drinking coffee, start coding :(

Name does not show when using in game voice crap.

I would recomend the Platronics GameCom 780 like someone already has. Cheap headset but with great sound for the money. The microphone is far better than any headset in the same pricerange aswell. The only thing that you do not seam to want is USB connection. Still I would recomend you buy these before any other pice of crap headsets like Steelseries or Razer. I've tried Razer headsets wich is just plain crap. You pay 90% for the brand. Accidently drop them on the floor and they break. Same with steelseries, no, worse. Totalt and utter crap. The Platronics GameCom 780 how ever. As I said, performes good and have dropped them 100 times, tripped on the USB cabel 100 times. Still working like new, no problem what so ever. http://www.engadget.com/products/plantronics/gamecom/780/

So where is that log?

Resolution: 2560x1440 Objects/Terrain: Normal Clouds/Shadows: Off AA: Normal, everything else on "Rendering" on lowest/off Textures: High Rout benchmarked: Fraps log: 2014-01-04 00:42:42 - DayZ Frames: 19632 - Time: 364875ms - Avg: 53.805 - Min: 32 - Max: 102