Weedz

Yes, that is how sound works genius .... I heard you can't see what's on the opposite side of a mountain from you either.

The kid asking how is 1pp realistic is now claiming he can see 3/4 of the way around his head without turning it ... classic. Moving your eyeballs to the left or right doesn't make the edge of your eye lid and socket or the entire side of your head not be there. I've never heard of any disease or birth defect that allows you to slide your eyes around the the side of your head ... In 1st person you feel like you're turning your head not moving your eyes even though you can't see your eyes and in fact your eyes do move but in 3rd person where you can see your head moving you can pretend like you're moving your eyes not your head .... So basically what you're trying to tell us is that you'll use any excuse or lie you can think of to try and justify your desperate need of the corner peeking crutch? This applies to the post below mine too.

I was hoping they were going to make the SA 1st person only as 3rd person completely ruins the game and the only people who don't want it removed are terribads who need the crutch of seeing around corners. AKA 80% of the players which makes it so the people who aren't little girls can't even play 1st person servers because nobody is in them ever. ^you know ... these people -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DayZ is 5000x more amazing in 1st person and 92000000x more immersive you actually get the shit scared out of you if a zombie or player comes around a corner in your face. You know a big reason people KoS ... because in 3rd person you don't feel like you are your character you feel like you're controlling an avatar in a videogame. The only excuse people who are pretending like they aren't desperatly relying on the crutch of corner camping can ever come up with is "we want to look at our characters sometimes" ... which you can do on the menu or any time by opening your inventory ... or "I'm bad at the controls for this game and can't remember if I'm crouched or not." I love the people who act like every single shooter ever made wasn't 1st person only for the first 30 years shooters existed yet people seemed to manage and that 1st or 3rd person / hardcore or casual weren't even words to describe a game ... you were just playing a shooter. People who act like it's impossible to play a shooter in 1st person view are HIGHlarious.

Yeah I noticed this in the only enterable residential brown house the mod had

This. Something isn't adding up when you're story is "so there are these 2 guys so I run up and KoS one and the other just stands there afk for 2 minutes so I just stare at him hoping I'll develop laser vision and kill him"

So you can accept that he can consistently hit a target 1/7th the width of a dime at 650M using iron-sighted 7.62 AK variant with the accuracy the best snipers to ever live couldn't even dream about achieving with a .50 cal anti-material rifle and using a gun sighting vice to hold it steady and focus on the part where he says he buried a gun for two years? :huh:

That's already built into videogames it's called if you're good at games you can aim and if you suck then you cry about KoS. That's what people are complaining about this game is limiting your skill with the stupid cone spread from shitty arcade games so it doesn't matter if you've spent years training on virtual guns.

The military has the effective range of AR-15 type guns at 500M because that is the distance they've found most people are able to consistently connect 7-9/10 shots on a human sized target.

Actually he was probably using some free hack before they added anti-cheat and then tried to continue using it like a dumbass after they turned on Battleye.

Considering you have a link to a free hack website in your profile that just steals things from other sites I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you're not a good hacker and didn't pay for your hacks. Hate to break it to you but using free scripts in Arma 2 DayZ mod wasn't hacking it was using something the game was designed to use and if you got banned it was because you were an idiot who tried to do something that was detectable after they started cracking down on "hackers" and you failed to read that it was detected. So again no, raising the price to keep out the 5 dumb kids who think they're "hackers" is a non-factor compared to the thousands of sales you would miss out on. Good hackers don't get banned unless they are very very very unlucky.

No, most of them nowadays you don't even download anything other than a launcher it's all done via streaming. And people hack because they were terrible at the game and want to pretend they are good or they are good they just want to make people mad.

Expensive gaming accessories are a gimmick and don't preform any better than normal ones. I've been using the same pair of sony headphones I got in the late 90's or early 00's that currently only cost like 5$ (used all the best shit when I was a pro FPS player and they preformed the same if not worse than these) and I shit all over Frankie as do most people. The vast majority of the stuff that happens in his video is set up by his friends especially in his DayZ videos. He also doesn't show the hours and hours or even days of himself getting wrecked between his kills. You just need to get a reputable brand and have a sound card not some Walmart special plugged directly into your motherboard or a USB port. My guess is you guys haven't played a lot of games that don't tell you exactly where you're getting shot from with a giant red arrow in the middle of your screen.

... use headphones where both sides work instead of only one? Kinda hard to explain how to use ears to someone ...

Don't know but if he really stood there for 1-2 minutes then disappeared probably something like that. Anyway I have more of a problem with people who need crutches in this game like hiding until they see people are sitting down so they can rush them when they get into a situation where they actually have a chance of dying after ambush killing one of them instead of having a firefight than I do someone who's internet died. Sounds like your own fault for not killing a guy who stood still for 2 minutes straight because you were to afraid he might fire back after knowing there were people near.

Anyone who thinks that hackers who are already paying 20 - 35$ PER MONTH for their hacks cares about having to rebuy the game on the off chance they get banned before the hack developers realize it's detected and turn off the ability to use the hack either is an idiot or knows nothing about hacks/hackers. Either way your idea would do nothing but deter new people from buying the game during a time when it's still selling ten thousand+ copies every day and go directly against the word of the games lead developer.

He might have killed his process or his internet died or something

Is this kid seriously trying to add he is a master of physics and won the lottery to his giant list of impossible accomplishments like being substantially smarter than Stephen Hawking and Einstein, being the greatest marksman the world has ever seen, and banging hot chicks on the reg while being 52 and pretending to live in a trailer .... Holy shit some people's brains are amazing

Way to ignore 90% of my post and just reply to the parts you choose while ignoring the rest. Those charts show that the AKM catches up to the SKS at 800M and that the SKS loses accuracy at a much higher rate than the AKM starting at 300-400M and like I said I've seen the left chart and that isn't the entire thing they go up to 1000M so my guess is the bottom is chopped off because they show the AKM becomes more accurate.

He also hits the targets on the side of the paper not the front too just cuz he's that good and he can. called it

Are you serious? When you're referring to consequences as a negative repercussion that occurs after you do an action someone deems wrong that is about the definition of punishment.

No no, this was at ~600M with an AK that had been buried for 2 years (probably used iron sights too) and he was banging out targets better than a marine recon sniper. He is actually one of the greatest marksman in the history of earth.

And yes OP I just did the Payday 2 free weekend and the M4 does in fact feel almost exactly the same as it does in this game. You also claim you have a 181 IQ and own your own hospital so ... cool story bro? Your intelligence is showing again too ... what does a brand new 500$ (farthest from original ever made) civilian model AK variant have anything at all to do with mid 1900's military SKS and AKMs? Yet again you just fill a thread with useless crap that doesn't even have anything to do with what people are talking about and brag about things that make you look like a lying idiot.

Random columns of number mean absolutely nothing especially when they aren't even in the same format and have nothing to indicate what they are showing. For all I know that could be showing the dispersion for under 200M. There is also huge flaws with the charts why are the numbers so wildly off from each other randomly they start almost the same and end exactly the same but are way off in the middle? Does one of the guns lose accuracy at 200M then gain it back at 400? Were the guns tested on the same day at the same time? Was it the same weather? Was it outside or inside? Was the humidity the same? Were they using bullets manufactured in the same place in the same batch? You can also clearly see that the AKM starts becoming closer to the accuracy of the SKS the farther down you go eventually becoming a tie at the bottom. The SKS loses accuracy at a much higher rate then the AMK in those charts. I've also seen the chart on the left and that isn't even the entire thing; what did you do cut off the bottoms of the charts because they show the AKM becomes more accurate? ... So thank you for proving my point that the AKM is more accurate at farther distances I guess? The SKS is an absolute POS weapon that was used for about 2 days in WW2 before being replaced by superior weaponry.

Actually it's totally a realistic effect of what happens when bullets hit things. You also don't need to shoot someone to kill them that is in fact the least fun way.

Good thing you're not in charge then because you clearly have no idea what a sandbox game is. Want people to have consequences ... form a group and go hunt them down. Limiting players with artificial built in "consequences" is the exact opposite of what this game is about.