Jump to content
austendude

What graphical settings do you play on?

Recommended Posts

Well, my computer has pretty good specs, but I have a Intel HD Family Graphics card, so I play on Low. It would probably be better if I played of very low but it looks like a PS1 game. With Low it looks like PS2 :p.

I would want to know how much FPS it is, but I have no idea how to see how much fps it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.fraps.com/

My Specs:

AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2Ghz

Motherboard Gigabyte 970a-d3

Patriot 8GB 1600

Gigabyte Windforce 6870 1TB Slighty OC'd

1TB HD


http://www.fraps.com/

My Specs:

AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2Ghz

Motherboard Gigabyte 970a-d3

Patriot 8GB 1600

Gigabyte Windforce 6870 1TB Slighty OC'd

1TB HD

I Also play on Normal - High settings. get 30-60 fps at 1440x900

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My computer has all quite good specs, except for my terrible graphics card. I play on low, with a thing or two tweaked slightly. I average about 30-40fps, but it drops when I am near trees or zoom in while using iron sights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Custom Built CoolerMaster 922 HAF

AVG : Nvidia Geforce 570 GTX 1280 MB

Motherboard : Asus P8Z68-M (Pro)

Processor : Intel i7-2600 3.4 GHz (2nd gen)

HDD : 1.5 TB Samsung 2x 2TB External HDD's

OS : Windows 7 64-bit Home Premium

Dual Display : 32 Inch LCD + 16 inch LCD monitor

Ram : 8 Gig Kingston DDR3

Every setting maxed including anti all that mombo jumbo at an avg of 75 fps the most it drops to is maybe 62 fps Arma2 is not that asking when it comes to hardware i had a Phenom ii x4 945 @3.2 GHz with an old GTX 460 with 768 MB of memory ran the game fine on high at a smooth 35+ fps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my then...

Interface and 3D Res: 1920 x 1080

Quality references: very high

text det: high

video mem: very high

aniso:normal

AA: disabled (enabled SMAA set to medium in config )

terrain: low

objects: normal

Shadows: normal

HDR: very high

Post proc: eff. disabled

interface: very small

aspect ration: custom

vsync: enabled

Intel i5 750 4cpu 2.8GHz

8Gb ram

GTX 560 ti twin frozer

FPS: pretty much 50 -60 all the time

I'm quite happy about my settings atm. Finally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I7@4.2

H80 water cooler

16gb Ram

60gb OCZ Sata3 SSD for the OS

2TB storage drive.

GTX580

Sony HMZ-T1 (limited to 720p)

All settings maxed out. smooth as silk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interface and 3D Res: 1920 x 1080

Quality references: very high

text det: high

video mem: very high

aniso:normal

AA: normal

terrain: high

objects: high

Shadows: high

HDR: very high

Post proc: eff. disabled

interface: very small

aspect ration: custom

vsync: disabled

22" monitor 1920x105

i5 2500k 4 ghz

8gb corsair memory

radeon 7850 2gb

gigabyte z77 mobo

all settings high basically, runs sweet as 50-60 fps constant no matter where on map, love it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maxed, except AA which I've read has caused problems so I just left it "normal".

Haven't check the actual numbers, but its not low enough to bother me. I've read disabling SLI would be give me better performance as well. Will probably test eventually.

Seems to hand around like 30% CPU usage and 40% GPU, but my GPU's never clock up all the way. Core Clock seems to stay at around 660 instead of 1250's where most games take it.

i5 2500k@4.5

Gigabyte WF 670's SLI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2500k @ 4.5ghz

8gb ram

gtx 460

1024*768 on high/very high. game looks gorgeous and runs at a smooth 75fps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no! ps1 style graphics? :( awh....i guess that just ruins the epic gameplay...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't use fraps.

Its shit for benchmarking.

Launch game > Single Player > Scenarios > Benchmark 01, 02 and 08.

Benchmark 2 is murder though, I only get about 20 fps at that. 01 and 08 go at about 45-60.

My specs are very high but performance is offset by 6000x1080 adjusted screen resolution.

(H100 cooled 3930k, Rampage IV, 32gb ram, twin GTX 590's, 3 GD245's, 2 Cougar MFD's with UM-80's, warthog hotas, combat pro pedals, g930 headset and track IR yadda yadda, a few other bits and pieces)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no! ps1 style graphics? :( awh....i guess that just ruins the epic gameplay...

It kind of does take away from the epic gameplay because it is VERY hard to see figures from far away with Very Low graphics. This can be terrible when there is a bandit with a long range rifle. It can be bad on any firefight situation.

So if I had to pick between low and very low... I'll choose low :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H80

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3

CPU: Intel i7 2600k @ 4.4ghz

Memory: 8gb Corsair Vengeance LP

Video Card: (2x) AMD HD6870 CrossfireX

Monitor: Asus VH238H 23" LED 1080p

Interface resolution: 1920x1080

3D Resolution: 1920x1080

Texture detail: Very high

Video memory: Very high

Anisotropic filtering: Very high

Anti-aliasing: Normal

Terrain detail: High

Objects detail: Very high

Shadow detail: Very high

HDR quality: Very high

Postprocess effect: Very high

Vsync: Disabled

Typical performance: 55-70 FPS

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2384444

In game appearance.

D1BC1F9CA58EAE85882432AC1CA493BDF4C07922

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1920*1080 and everything on highest settings except for HDR quality which I leave on normal. I think the HDR quality is broken or something because it alone halves my fps. As far as I know its been optimised for ARMA3.

Usually get 40-60 fps

EVGA GTX680

i7 950 @ 3.6ghhz

12gigs Corsair dominator

OCZ Vertex 4 256gb SSD (my latest impulse buy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High, High and High or Very high .......... all maxed out

Asus Striker II Extreme

2.83 Ghz Core 2 Quad

BFG - GTX 280

6 GB of Memory

2 24 inch screens [one always has a zoomable Day Z map up]

built the box for aprox $ 2500 Nov. 08

she is due for replacement this fall ........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2500k @ 4.5ghz

8gb ram

gtx 460

1024*768 on high/very high. game looks gorgeous and runs at a smooth 75fps.

Holy crap you are so lucky. Then again I dont play PC games (this is the first PC game I've played in a long time and will stick to xbox until I live on my own with enough money for a great gaming PC). So I guess I am lucky my family computer can even run this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, look at all the epeens with their system specs.

Just like I did when I played quake, I play with my settings turned all the way down and my visibility maxed.

All of those pretty graphics just make it harder to see players that may kill you. Turning all of that shit off is a benefit. Don't think hiding in that grass means you're actually hidden, because that grass doesn't draw 25m away from you.

Yes, I can see you crawling prone down the side of the hill.

The only way to do it right, would be to handle it like world of tanks. If you're "hidden" and not moving, you're actually invisible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything on maximum @ 1920x1080, anti aliasing and post processing disabled, visibility 1000~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a AMD Phenom II X4 @ 3GHz, and a Sapphire Radeon HD 6870, and I can turn everything all the way up and still get around 40 fps at 1920x1080. The Radeon HD was the most affordable card with good specs I cound find a year ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my computer has pretty good specs

onboard graphics card

That's not how that works...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2500k @ 4.5ghz

8gb ram

gtx 460

1024*768 on high/very high. game looks gorgeous and runs at a smooth 75fps.

You have a pretty decent pc but why such a low resolution?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Intel Core i7 2600 @3.4GHZ

8GB RAM

2TB HDD

ATI HD 7670 2GB

I run at High/Medium with resolution at 1440x900 and Visibility 2-3k

FPS is usually 40-60FPS, never goes under 30. Gonna upgrade the video card soon :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×