Cannibalism

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

Ok searched forum and only seen a few topics on this and would like to see what people thought about this idea :P

Add ability to "gut" and eat dead players ? But only if the player has been recently killed !

Im not major serious about the idea ..but just wondering what people would think of adding a dark side to the game ?

And what other thoughts/ideas would you suggest to add to the dark side of the game ?

Edited July 18, 2012 by Massicor

[thorgold 91]

Ok searched forum and didnt see any topic on this

Bullshit.

One search for keyword "cannibal" or "cannibalism" comes up with five topics that have cannibalism explicitly in the title. What search did you use, "Suggestion allow eating guts?" Don't lie, moron, especially when your claim can be debunked with one click.

Cannibalism can't happen because it would cause any standalone DayZ game to be banned in Australia and New Zealand, and Rocket doesn't want to alienate an entire region over a trivial feature. His words.

Edited July 18, 2012 by thorgold

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

I did change my post right after i finished writting it to correct what i wrote about searching the forum. Its habbit that i always save as soon as im done then correct it after ...also

zombies or infected (humans that are have the virus) eating people ?

Edited July 18, 2012 by Massicor

[thorgold 91]

zombies eating players ?

Not considered objectionable. Having an animal eat a human isn't offensive, having a human eat a human is.

STILL doesn't cover the fact that you're a lazy, pathetic liar. That just pisses me off - why lie about using the search bar? It's like murdering a cop to cover up a murder!

Edited July 18, 2012 by thorgold

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

Not considered objectionable. Having an animal eat a human isn't offensive, having a human eat a human is.

STILL doesn't cover the fact that you're a lazy, pathetic liar. That just pisses me off - why lie about using the search bar? It's like murdering a cop to cover up a murder!

Grow up and keep to the topic

Edited July 18, 2012 by Massicor

[masond04@hotmail.co.uk 4]

Not considered objectionable. Having an animal eat a human isn't offensive, having a human eat a human is.

STILL doesn't cover the fact that you're a lazy, pathetic liar. That just pisses me off - why lie about using the search bar? It's like murdering a cop to cover up a murder!

Are your for real or what a zombie eating a person is cannabalism remember their just infected, why talk bs and troll this post people like you should hang themselves as you are undesirable

Stick to the topic in hand this is a good idea and actualy if a zombie Apocalypse did happen and their was no food you would or could turn to canablism please think before you post

[thorgold 91]

Are your for real or what a zombie eating a person is cannabalism remember their just infected, why talk bs and troll this post people like you should hang themselves as you are undesirable

Stick to the topic in hand this is a good idea and actualy if a zombie Apocalypse did happen and their was no food you would or could turn to canablism please think before you post

How about read before you post. You know, the part where I pointed out that rocket doesn't want the game banned in Australia, so cannibalism would never be added to the game because would alienate Australian and New Zealand players.

Then, this guy tried to justify cannibalism as "acceptable" by saying "zombies eat players". Therefore, I explain that zombies eating eating players isn't offensive because zombies are considered animals / enemies and it's acceptable within the genre. Don't tell me that I'm off-topic just because you're too stupid to read the context or understand the topic at hand!

Edited July 18, 2012 by thorgold

[MikeTupper 68]

U mad bro?

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

How about read before you post. You know, the part where I pointed out that rocket doesn't want the game banned in Australia, so cannibalism would never be added to the game because would alienate Australian and New Zealand players.

Then, this guy tried to justify cannibalism as "acceptable" by saying "zombies eat players". Therefore, I explain that zombies eating eating players isn't offensive because zombies are considered animals / enemies and it's acceptable within the genre. Don't tell me that I'm off-topic just because you're too stupid to read the context or understand the topic at hand!

Infected = Humans with virus

Humans with virus = Eating people

Eating people = Cannibalism

Other players are considered enimies also ( as they can kill you )

Also this wouldnt get banned ..and if it had a chance to get banned ..theres ways around it :) simple. Umad bro @ being proven wrong and that you dont see things logically ?

[masond04@hotmail.co.uk 4]

How about read before you post. You know, the part where I pointed out that rocket doesn't want the game banned in Australia, so cannibalism would never be added to the game because would alienate Australian and New Zealand players.

Then, this guy tried to justify cannibalism as "acceptable" by saying "zombies eat players". Therefore, I explain that zombies eating eating players isn't offensive because zombies are considered animals / enemies and it's acceptable within the genre. Don't tell me that I'm off-topic just because you're too stupid to read the context or understand the topic at hand!

OMFG zombies are not animals zombies are people that are infected stop this bullshit chat now you my freind are pathetic and your argument isnt valid to the idea go Troll else where

[iSayNo 0]

U mad bro?

all i can think of this guy is raging hard.

[moofactory 62]

In jan 2013 we get an R.

NZ already has an R.

This will not get it banned.

Cannibalism is not offensive... its a practical way to survive.

Its just a challenge to the moral compass that is drilled into modern society's heads.

In some tribal cultures even now, its a socially acceptable norm.

The modern westernised world just isnt used to it.

I see no problem using the recently dead as a food source to feed a community.

If you died and we were in Antarctica and cut off for hundreds of km's id eat you without battering an eyelid.

[DestinyAscension 4]

Bullshit.

One search for keyword "cannibal" or "cannibalism" comes up with five topics that have cannibalism explicitly in the title. What search did you use, "Suggestion allow eating guts?" Don't lie, moron, especially when your claim can be debunked with one click.

Very mature and objective point of view so far

[killashrub324815@gmail.com 18]

Only if you have less than 3000 life and food meter is blinking. I dont know about anyone else on this planet but i would only think about eating a person if i was about to die and had no other choice.

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

Only if you have less than 3000 life and food meter is blinking. I dont know about anyone else on this planet but i would only think about eating a person if i was about to die and had no other choice.

This is a good idea ..but mabie raise it to 5000-7000 life as 3000 seems a little low..but i do like the thinking behind the 3000 life u said.

[Ophidion 11]

thorgold is actually correct. And for the love of God, stop saying "U MAD BRO" or anything of the such. It makes you look like a prattling 12 year old.

Anyways, if games such as The Army Of 2 can get banned, he's right. A standalone version of the game can easily get banned. Guess what, Fallout 3, banned in Australia for a multitude of reasons. One of them being, you guessed it, cannabalism. You could select a perk, to crouch down and consume a human, the same goes for F:NV.

A human, regardless of it's physical stature, is a human and consuming another human is fucked to hell and I'm pretty sure that if you had "0" choice I doubt any of you would eat an actual human. Think about it, you say it because you want to prove a point but in reality you wouldn't go near a goddamn corpse let alone ingest it's flesh.

Adding it is a terrible idea. It's even expressed that there's controversy whether it even provides any real health value compared to risks.

Cannabalism is only refered to as a species consuming another organism of the same species. So no, zombies are not alive, they are no longer a human meaning it is not cannabalism because it is a different organism. They aren't "people" they lost cognitive functions and ability to reason like a normal human, their body is considered dead.

Edited July 19, 2012 by Ophidion

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

thorgold is actually correct. And for the love of God, stop saying "U MAD BRO" or anything of the such. It makes you look like a prattling 12 year old.

Anyways, if games such as The Army Of 2 can get banned, he's right. A standalone version of the game can easily get banned. Guess what, Fallout 3, banned in Australia for a multitude of reasons. One of them being, you guessed it, cannabalism. You could select a perk, to crouch down and consume a human, the same goes for F:NV.

A human, regardless of it's physical stature, is a human and consuming another human is fucked to hell and I'm pretty sure that if you had "0" choice I doubt any of you would eat an actual human. Think about it, you say it because you want to prove a point but in reality you wouldn't go near a goddamn corpse let alone ingest it's flesh.

Adding it is a terrible idea. It's even expressed that there's controversy whether it even provides any real health value compared to risks.

Cannabalism is only refered to as a species consuming another organism of the same species. So no, zombies are not alive, they are no longer a human meaning it is not cannabalism because it is a different organism. They aren't "people" they lost cognitive functions and ability to reason like a normal human, their body is considered dead.

Seems you didnt read all my post and just skipped ahead without using your brain and without reading into what this mod is accually about. Infected are humans and they are very much alive and are cannabalizing other people end off! None of your silly health value and organism mumble jumble! And for the record ...you wouldnt cannabalise people for "health value" as you said ....you eat them to stop the hunger ..silly person!

Edited July 19, 2012 by Massicor

[Ophidion 11]

If it has no value, why in the actual fuck would I eat a human instead of reaching into my pack for food.

There ARE no infected humans in this game. There are humans, and zombies. An infected human is someone who carries a dormant or virulent virus but isn't a zombie. We don't HAVE any of those.

Therefore, there is no cannabalism because zombies aren't humans.

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

If it has no value, why in the actual fuck would I eat a human instead of reaching into my pack for food.

There ARE no infected humans in this game. There are humans, and zombies. An infected human is someone who carries a dormant or virulent virus but isn't a zombie. We don't HAVE any of those.

Therefore, there is no cannabalism because zombies aren't humans.

Ok ill stop you there ...as you just proved my point that you dont know what this mod is about :)) are you stupid btw ...the answer to your question about the value of cannabalism is already answered in what i wrote ...there is no health value you fool ...only to stop hunger...and wtf nonsense are you talking about reaching into your pack for food ..you know what nevermind ..dont explain it as i already know your answer will be full of holes and not thought out.

Edited July 19, 2012 by Massicor

[Ophidion 11]

Ok ill stop you there ...as you just proved my point that you dont know what this game is about :)) are you stupid btw ...the answer to your question about the value of cannabalism is already answered in what i wrote ...there is no health value you fool ...only to stop hunger...and wtf nonsense are you talking about reaching into your pack for food ..you know what nevermind ..dont explain it as i already know your answer will be full of holes and not thought out.

Okay, you talk like a 8 year old mental degenerate so I'll break it down nice and easy for you to understand.

Nobody is going to eat a fucking person to stop Hunger. We have hunting for a reason, hell taking the produce from the fields in the towns is a much better option. It's very far and few to actually find a player let alone consume the goddamn body. You're better off going to the nearest town and getting food. Got it?

The game is supposed to take a realistic turn, and consuming narcotic flesh from a zombie doesn't work. And a human is simply too rare to have any real value. Besides, even then, the player you just killed, most likely has food on him. You clearly no nothing about survival if your first option for getting rid of hunger is to eat a Goddamn person you dunce.

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

Okay, you talk like a 8 year old mental degenerate so I'll break it down nice and easy for you to understand.

Nobody is going to eat a fucking person to stop Hunger. We have hunting for a reason, hell taking the produce from the fields in the towns is a much better option. It's very far and few to actually find a player let alone consume the goddamn body. You're better off going to the nearest town and getting food. Got it?

The game is supposed to take a realistic turn, and consuming narcotic flesh from a zombie doesn't work. And a human is simply too rare to have any real value. Besides, even then, the player you just killed, most likely has food on him. You clearly no nothing about survival if your first option for getting rid of hunger is to eat a Goddamn person you dunce.

..

(You said) "and consuming narcotic flesh from a zombie" Im not talking about eating zombies you bloody fool..And for you information ...I see dead bodies all the time..alot of them are ones iv just killed. So yet again you dont know what your talking about ..finding bodies isnt rare at all :)) Your talking about knowing things about surviving ..im sorry ..when was the last zombie/infected human apocalypse you where in to know exactly what people would and wouldnt do to survive and keep rations from running low?

Also "Nobody is going to eat a fucking person to stop Hunger" There is no way you could know this ..especially if its not someone they knew ...god your so silly in your thought process!

Edited July 19, 2012 by Massicor

[moofactory 62]

The game is supposed to take a realistic turn, and consuming narcotic flesh from a zombie doesn't work. And a human is simply too rare to have any real value. Besides, even then, the player you just killed, most likely has food on him. You clearly no nothing about survival if your first option for getting rid of hunger is to eat a Goddamn person you dunce.

Already said id eat you if you were dead and we had nothing and were trapped in a wasteland.

Its already happened.

Go watch this movie.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106246/

True story.

Edited July 19, 2012 by moofactory

[ryan__mc__@hotmail.co.uk 131]

Moo ...this guy has no clue what hes talking about:))

Edited July 19, 2012 by Massicor

[Ophidion 11]

..

(You said) "and consuming narcotic flesh from a zombie" Im not talking about eating zombies you bloody fool..And for you information ...I see dead bodies all the time..alot of them are ones iv just killed. So yet again you dont know what your talking about ..finding bodies isnt rare at all :)) Your talking about knowing things about surviving ..im sorry ..when was the last zombie/infected human apocalypse you where in to know exactly what people would and wouldnt do to survive and keep rations from running low?

Oh look out, we have a badass out here who likes eating bodies instead of the goddamn food the people just killed had in their packs.

And I'm sorry, I wasn't aware you lived in an infected fictional game where you can kill and eat people.

So this dumbshit who explains that human bodies are not only a great way to remove hunger, they're so common that they are the best option! Wow, if you think to actually eat the body instead of looking inside of the pack the person was carrying, you clearly are an idiot. If you (supposedly) kill so many people, you would have to be a fucking dumbass to realize that ONE of them has to have food in their pack.

@moofactory: A. That's a movie. B. Doesn't matter if it's based off of real life, you're not one of them. C. They didn't have viable alternatives for food unlike in DayZ.

Edited July 19, 2012 by Ophidion

[thorgold 91]

Seems you didnt read all my post and just skipped ahead without using your brain and without reading into what this mod is accually about. Infected are humans and they are very much alive and are cannabalizing other people end off! None of your silly health value and organism mumble jumble! And for the record ...you wouldnt cannabalise people for "health value" as you said ....you eat them to stop the hunger ..silly person!

Stop debating the nature of the zombies/infected. It's a petty nuance that you're hiding behind in order to support a position that was crushed in the first post - cannibalism would get this game banned in several countries. Enough with the "OOHHH, ZOMBIES ARE HUMANS SO ITS AWRIGHT," you sound like some whiny brat who says "You said I couldn't go to the movie with my friends... so I'll go to the movie alone and just happen to meet them there! HAH!"

The point is, humans consuming humans in a mechanic that could be defined by anyone as "cannibalism" would get DayZ banned as a standalone in Australia and other videogame-restrictive countries. Zombies get a free pass due to their acceptance in popular culture, so don't try to hitch cannibalism onto that premise. Furthremore, you refuse to acknowledge my basic argument: Rocket, the game dev, has said he won't do this.

If you wanted too, say, see this as a standalone game or as part of another game *for reals* then such an addition would probably mean you couldn't play it in carebear countries like Australia

And, related to your "I searched and found nothing," that quote is from the "A case for cannibalism!" topic that's a month old.