JohnyBravo 15 Posted January 21, 2016 (edited) First of all, the GTX 750 (even its Ti big brother) is awful. It's outperformed by its little brother (the GTX 580) that was released in 2010 that you can more than likely get your hands on for under $75. Secondly, the biggest difference in performance for me (lately) is setting Object Quality to Very Low. I have everything else on the highest setting, but if I raise Object Quality even to Normal, my performance suffers — even on a CPU that's clocked at 5.2GHz. I recently built a computer (specs in my profile) that I ended up selling because the performance in almost every game was so marginal compared to my older computer (that I'm using again, specs also in my profile). As people have said, this game is currently a mess. If you can score 40 FPS, consider yourself lucky. My bad, I have got it wrong. I was talking about the 760, which is a gaming card and also why i mentioned in the earlier post the narrative of geforce 6600, 6800 etc back in the day when i first learned the numbering of telling it's standing performance. Everything above 6 in nvidia and geforce cards is a gaming card. I had a 6800 256 mb i used for a long time, costed a fortune back then aswell. Right now I am using a 760 and it's very decent. All my games on full, except Arma 3, GTA 5 and DayZ and It's OK. I do however play on over 40 fps in DayZ with a few dips here and there, but very smooth to say the least. i5 4670k clocked to 4.5 ghz and 16gb 1800 mhz ram. I have everything on low, except Terrain, texture and resolution set at 1920x1080 and vsync off. Rendering resolution at 100%. The game doesnt look very pretty(actually not that bad), but on the other hand it runs very well. Sorry, Eno. 750 is not considered a gaming card. xD Edited January 21, 2016 by JohnyBravo 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
