laszers 6 Posted July 2, 2012 hello all. i have a quick question to ask, as far as damage goes which gun is better. i know they both fire the same bullet, but when i used the fn fal i was able to drop allot of people with one hit, not with the mk though. Is it just my mind playing tricks on me? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zecele 211 Posted July 2, 2012 I would say the FN FAL is slightly more powerfull. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x_vovka 2 Posted July 2, 2012 it depends on distance, you can kill someone even with 1 bullet 5.45 cl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
laszers 6 Posted July 2, 2012 ok, then at say 200 meters,as far as damage which one would be more effective. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeromentor 169 Posted July 2, 2012 That's why I like the FN Fal, even with the limited ammo. 3 mags last a long time if you don't spray at everything that moves.I've never used an Mk 48 though. I suppose the ability to put more rounds down range would be good if you are trying to suppress a group of people, or put down a group in seconds. The FN Fal would be better at accurate medium-long range fire, but with iron sights you might be a bit limited in engagements over 300 meters, and outclassed at 500+ by weapons with scopes.But more rounds down range means a better chance of hitting and killing the targets, but you will become a MASSIVE target. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
laszers 6 Posted July 2, 2012 yea i have put down two people at a time in like three seconds with the mk, something i definitely could not do with the FAL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krishbenda 0 Posted July 2, 2012 GOOD LUCK FINDING AMMO FOR THE FAL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
laszers 6 Posted July 2, 2012 when i had it i had 7 mags, not that hard really, my friend had another 4. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uuni 74 Posted July 2, 2012 I absolutely love the FAL and only let go of it after i found MK 48Haven't tried the other one you mentioned but I'd stick with FAL for the feel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davidcastle 19 Posted July 2, 2012 hello all. i have a quick question to ask' date=' as far as damage goes which gun is better. i know they both fire the same bullet, but when i used the fn fal i was able to drop allot of people with one hit, not with the mk though. Is it just my mind playing tricks on me?[/quote']Don't listen to anyone else, Mk48 in a competent person's hands is the best gun atm. Even better than snipers. You can accurately engage targets past 500m with it (assuming your resolution loves you) It is a one hit kill 100 round full auto weapon. (of course you can single fire it and SHOULD). Honestly, don't EVER let one of these go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smithy0815 6 Posted July 2, 2012 today i found a heli crashsite, i left my fal for a 5.56 sa80 with night/thermal scope. (2nd gun is mp5sd6) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites