Performance issues

[Aign0r 3]

I have perfomance issues with dayz

My specs:

ATI Radeon HD 6770 1gb ddr5

i3 3.1ghz

8gb ddr3

Anyways with this specs i should be able to run it in full, but i can't get

more than 40fps with all on high, except hdr which is normal, antialiasing low, post processing disabled, and shadows on low-normal.

Latest ati catalyst

windows 7 64bit

Any suggestions?

[piemanpm 13]

I can't get higher than 20 with the settings I have and I have better specs. Just be happy with 40. Lol.

[Aign0r 3]

I managed to get it up to 50-60 in forest/buildings but still 30-40 in town :(

[dcskill 117]

You expect to get 50+ fps on high settings with an i3 and 6770? Ha!

This game rapes any non-custom built pc out there. You may be able to run BF3 on ultra, but the best you can get out of this mod is normal settings (1080x720).

I have the same gpu, but with an i7. :)

[Soldier of Failure 14]

Try GameBooster. Or settle with 40fps. Human eye cant really tell the differance with anything above 30 FPS

[Aign0r 3]

Human eye can't, but this isn't real fps, and you certainly feel difference between 30-50 especially in a shoot out.

Well i play with a mate and he has 2-3 years old comp which has much worse specs and we now run it on same settings and he still has better fps than me...

[maracusarillius_irl 2]

Human eye cant really tell the differance with anything above 30 FPS

This has been proven to be incorrect.

There was a test done where they took a group of fighter pilots and flashed different images of aircraft on a screen, each image lasting 1/200th of a second.

Not only did the pilots see the planes, but they could identify them.

This proves that the human eye can see in excess of 200fps.

The reason the whole "human eye can't see above 30" argument came about is back when a fps standard had to be set for film.

24fps was settled upon as it was the bare minimum they could get away with before the image looked too jerky.

This was when everything was shot on film, and saving a couple of fps would save rolls of film over the course of a shoot=big money saved.

The way film displays images has a natural motion blur to it so 24fps or 30fps seems smooth for film, whereas a game or anything that shows clear individual images needs a fair bit higher fps to look as smooth as the same thing on film.

The minimum for perfectly smooth and fluid gameplay is 60fps.

Try a game @ 30fps, then the same game @ 60fps or 120fps and tell me the higher fps doesn't look smoother.

What someone can "tolerate" is another thing altogether :D