ivan keska

There are Ghillie suits designed for the sole purpose of counting thermals devices, but they aren't common. I think the more common creams and face paints would be a better addition since these are more likely to be found in the real world. Also can we please make Ghillie suits the satanic fire hazard they are in real life, because if youve seen the videos and read the story's of ghillies burning, you would never wear a Ghillie suit even remotely close to a fire.

Death should be punished because your goal is to survive so if you fail at that, why should you be allowed to just get right back in. But admins should wipe out the ban hammers and start coming down hard on griefers. Because if those people have nothing to fear from being griefers, what reason do they have to stop.

Svd might be the only weapon I would kill someone for, but I don't under stand why it's rare when the gun irl is on of the most common marksman rifles in the world.

And yet you have many only killing one another, this game is suppose to be a sandbox but as an end of the world zombie survival sim.

The g17 is one of the best pistols super effective against guys using nvg's, also very accurate not the mention its just above notice level to zombies as suppressed weapons. Also the size of round is meaningless it were you hit that makes all the difference. Now as for this idea I like it, makes sense and it's nothing complex or at least it appears not to be.

Thank you, also at close range this won't matter much only those that fight beyond close quarters combat would really be effected. Well the idiots who know nothing about sniping and think its easy would be turned off to it. Because shooting at long range is skill that is very hard to get good at.

Something I think that should be done to the zeroing system that would make it more realistic is you no longer have set distances. So now when you zero a weapon you have the mil number, click, or what ever it is for that weapon. This means zeroing a weapon requires you to not only to know the distance but to know the mil the optic needs to be set at for that range. Now each optic would vary because not all optics use the same set up. This could also be used with a system were you have to zero a weapon you find, in order to make sure it will hit where you aim. This makes the act of sniping more difficult and more realistic, also if you have you sight in a weapon you find that makes picking up weapons all the time very risky, since they might have their sights off thus missing your target is very easy. Also if you have used a rifle before you know sighting in the firearm is extremely important, because even a rifle you bought from someone you often have to spend the time to adjust the irons and/or optics on.

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Meh Yes Already in (glocery store) Maybe but bullets can't cut ropes, been tested and can't be done in a realistic way.

I was making the point nearly everyone here is taking out of there ass, and not in the least bit presenting anything that proves them right. But your right most people wouldn't know how to bandage themselves in real life, and some if shot would go full retard I bet and believe they have to get the bullet out. But note how societies did form but we are are still in a way separate, we generally group with people who are similar to ourselves. If you google it a bit, you might find the video I say done with very young children and two stuffed animals. Both animals were he exact same except one like a snack the kids liked and the other liked the snack the kids didn't like. An deven thou both animals acted the same and looked the same the kids always wanted to be friends with the one that liked their snack. There is more to it but that sums it up for the most part. Anyways kinda says a lot about the herd mentality we have as a species.

Winter would be awesome, because the snow would make night more friendly sight wise but also dangerous because of the cold.

How about this all off you are retarded and your opinions means nothing because they are wrong. Now since that's out of the way, stop discussing this issue without showing any kind of facts supporting your claim. So if you think people will just kill people in reality PROVE IT if you think people won't be slaughting one another but try to rebuild PROVE IT Other wise every thing you guys say is bullshit and holds zero value, because you have no creditable evidence to support you claim.

Survival is a something you should be constantly working at like in reality, so making it closer to reality I support.

Your opinions are worth nothing unless supported by facts. So unless you can present studies and information that supports your claim, you are WRONG. Now I support these ideas of effects on the player from killing, but I'm wrong unless I bother to provide facts that support what I have said.

The idea itself maybe not me realistic but the ability to know who is a danger and who isn't, that is. Because in reality a person isn't a blank slate like in game so you are able to read body language and thus be able to figure out if you can approach or not.

I like the detail you go into and I love the realism this would bring so, I love this idea.