ProGamerGov

How would people feel about tranquilizer guns as a way to subdue people safely from a distance?

It would be better if it was realistic. If they choose a real tranquilizer gun and recreated it in game.

Really? Because my medical test subjects disagree...

Do we have filters, sun powered or other methods of filtering out the salt and purifying salt water yet?

It's odd not to have anything exist to be able to utilize such a vast resource. It doesn't even have to be complicated, just fill a bucket or container and use the sun to filter it into a central cup. If when modding comes around and we don't get the 24/7 easy mode PvP maps. Then one could assume a feature like this would be great for a map composed of many islands or were a survivor may have to live on a floating object or structure.

That's one of BI's major game feature for Dayz to Arma, to Take On Mars. They all have real world terrains. They don't have to modify them to look natural because they are natural!

WTF is with you COD and BF players complaining you can't play easy mode death match because the map is too large? The map is never too large, it's just other game developers are lazy. Your not supposed to find other players like your playing BF or COD, it survival not 1000 player death match.

Thanks for this. Now I can has dupes! Jk

No none of that delete when dead or destroy itself crap. It would exist until triggered or disarmed. If you die, it lives on as your legacy. A zombie could trigger it as well. Or you could convince in suspecting players to go in first to test it.

I was thinking more a long the lines of needles filled with horrible things. Imagine being infected with an unknown virus. :)

You sound like the people that "volunteer" for my medical experiments. :) Adding Russian roulette would provide great entertainment for by disposing of them humanely!

Newbies like to be killed in interesting ways like medical experiments and would likely like Russian roulette as well. They say it's way more fun than just shooting newbies point blank for fun. And is actually the kind of KOS were they do not just die but get cool gameplay before dieing.

People I have met said they preferred dying to my medical experiments over being shot. It was more fun for them. Now I can actually follow through with my threats about eating them!

Everything else tries to be realistic, so why would they stop at weapons? It should be realistic.

"5. Don't add helicopters! I absolutely love flying helicopters in the DayZ Mod and ArmA. I really think they shouldn't be added, at all, to Standalone. In the mod they always made camps pointless. Players in a chopper could find every camp on the server in a single day. I just don't want to see all the amazing camp/base locations I've found made obsolete because of an un-needed flying vehicle. I'm all for having nearly any type of ground vehicle." No, just no. Helicopters are coming. Hide you camp better from the Sky instead of whinning.

So many factors can exist, body armor, blood, caliber and others. They are realistic. If you want them unrealistically balanced, go mod that yourself into the mod.

Funny thing is in the United States, on many occasions rocket launchers have been confiscated or turned over to police. So it's not far fetched for them to exist.

One of the great things about the mod was being able to become overpowered in the first place. This isn't a PvP centric game, but some people are arguing like it is and it will ruin there stupid sense of balance in a survival simulator...If your only argument is weapon balance, please go play the mod. We don't need this turning into constant buffs and nerfs for some stupid sense of balance. Let's try to keep things realistic. On the actual intelligent side of things, the AS50 is a gas powered rifle and is made by the British. Why would I want to have to rely on gas that would run out because more gas is not coming into chernarus anymore. If it was Russian then I could see that happening but why would a British rfle exist in some part of Russia no one cares about?

I think the only thing that is MMO about Dayz is the amount of players, nothing more, and nothing less.

Private hives will also remove anything that people consider "hard or difficult".

As far as I'm concerned, when you look at other MMO games, I sure as he'll hope dayz doesn't take that path. It's a Survival simulator MMO with Zombies.

People have bad days were nothing goes right.

What about loosing connection, being kicked, crashing, accidentally leaving or joining a bad server. Stupid things like these would ruin the game for people with a fix like that.

He thinks the developers are ruining the game by making it complex. Most people disagree and I hope it stays that way. He wants skills, factions and other stuff at players based and makes me hate MMO. The problem with the term MMO is people think that means MLG balance, skills, micro transactions, free to play and other awful things. Dayz uses net code similar to MMOs but it is not and never will be one. It's basically a survival simulator with zombies. Not an MMO in need of arcade features. People love the fact the game doesn't try to make every one happy, that's why it's successful, because every other game on the market tries so hard to make everyone happy and appeal to the lowest intelligence level possible.

There is medical equipment for testing blood type. I use blood type to KOS people on the coast. I go up to them and take blood from some and give it to others, then sit back and wait to see who lives and who dies.