timmoboy

The Arma community is very mature and understanding, unlike DayZ forums filled with whiny little kids complaining about everything :)

Well, good luck waiting forever then! :) There is an engine that seems very promising tho. The "Outerra Engine". It's still just in alpha but man, it's freaking amazing. If you want to support them it will only cost you like 15 bucks! :)

It's the Arma 2 patch, nothing that Rocket did so please stop mention it every fucking where.....

If Crytek would make a zombie survival game then you would not be playing a game anything near resembling DayZ..... *Ooo shinyyy graphixxx, must be best engine in whole wooorld!!!!* -.-

I totally agree with you Tusk. I mean, all these subtle things like bullets ejecting from the barrel and no "cone of fire" is very important for me to feel immersed in a game that tries to reflect "reality". And I'm pretty sure the people in here really have no idéa what RV3/4 is capable of and is doing right Now. I do like the CryEngine, Crysis 1 was actually the game that got me into pc-gaming, but with using this engine you get so much more than just fancy graphics, physics etc. But don't get me wrong. Every Arma player out there knows how buggy and unfriendly this engine can be, but there's really nothing like it out on the market so we look past these things. And BI's is one of the best developers I know of that really listen to their community. So I think we should all just wait and see what Rocket think is the best option for DayZ. After all, only he knows (to some extent) where he wants to take this game and I'm sure he will make the right call!

Because you are playing on someone else's server you will play with HIS settings...

Veteran servers can still have crosshair enabled.

@Hulahuga With the animations I mean: seeing your legs while looking down, free look and not a Fucking floating camera. But sure, why don't you make CryZ in a couple of months and show us how great the game works for everyone.....

Any way we could get DayZ on iPhone? Wouldn't take anymore than a couple of days to port it I guess?

Unless Rocket or some known developer say it can be done I wont take anyone's word for it. And even if it's possible, to get the same feeling we have in DayZ in CE3 with realistic animation etc it would take a pretty fucking big development team and atleast a year to come up with anything playable.

Stole it? Are you stupid or what?

For those who wants to see how Arma 3/RV 4 engine looks like, watch these: Here you get to see new animations (doesn't seem clunky at all), lightning etc. Imo, this looks soo much better then CE3, UE4 you name it. It has that natural look to it.

I really would like to hear Rocket's view point in using RV4 instead of CE3/UE. I'm pretty sure it's the best option but please Rocket, make a comment to all those people bashing the RV engine and let them know why you are using it and not the others!

Looks like everyone in this thread are experts at programming and developing games... Rocket can you please explain to them why CryEngine isn't the best option for DayZ? I'm not an expert but I believe the RV engine is the best one out there for DayZ and especially if he'll make it stand alone using it. Just because CE3 has *oh so fancy graphics* doesn't mean it will handle 100+ players, lots of AI and huge maps at the same time! I could be wrong but please shed some light for us Master Rocket! Or someone with great knowledge.....