BootYourFace

But right now it IS restricted to men's clothing, and without support otherwise, it'd stay that way. I edited my post after you made yours, but I brought up spawning with only a flashlight, and how that would kind of make a weak survivor if this is post outbreak. My point is, the reality of it all is there would be skirts, and dresses, just a bunch of various other female clothing. On the other end, no body suggested mini skirt that must show off a bit of the ass and tube top that doesn't go past under the breasts. We're not wanting whores standing on the corner. We're just wanting some more realism to the characters in the game.

It is a fashion show. We have cowboy hats and payday masks. We have leather jackets specifically made for shotguns. It's most definitely a fashion show, and women don't get their fair share. That's all.

Jeeze. Guys are pretty stupid when it comes to women. Female says - "I want to wear women's clothes on my female character." Men says - "FUCKING IDIOT! In the apocalypse people would on'y wear men's clothing!" It'd be highly dangerous for anyone to wear extremely baggy clothing. So unless you're an Amazon Women, you ladies stand no chance in the case of disasters. The point here is they want to have something on their character that makes them feel and look more like that are in real life. It'd be smarter to run around with a skirt all day than a motorcycle helmet. Overheating and all with that thing on is fine, BUT I'LL BE DAMNED IF I SEE A PINK DRESS! Grow up neck beards. Besides, we're survivors. There would be more than just cargo pants and military jackets worn by the initial survivors. Has it been established that the outbreak is on going, or that the time line is post outbreak. If its post outbreak, why do we only spawn with a flashlight? I always thought the game as more of "waking up and OH SHIT ZOMBIES".

How about this. My buddy and I randomly discovered one time. He was looting and I was bored outside, started hitting the ground saying we're taking fire, then BOOM, fire ball. Scared the shit outta me.

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=231764077 This is the good bush. Don't eat the Blueberries!

My idea of friendly is simply not just outright killing someone I get the jump on. I recently switched to the Experimental servers, and have ran into a lot more people. Sometimes they exchange words like "HEY I'M FRIENDLY DON'T SHOOT", while I say "Yeah sure, turn around and you won't get dead!" I then make the plan for both of us "You go that way, I go the other way. No one needs to die here." When in a group, and the same situation happens, based on the response of the player we happen upon, either do a "forced" trade (meaning we'll rob if we have to), or give them so much misinformation as to what we're really up to, or lead them off in a different direction. But no. I don't go looking for trouble, and to me that's being friendly in a game where everyone can kill each other. Just like in real life, nice guys get taken advantage of. I highly doubt any of these "friendly" players, put in a real life situation, would run up to anyone, especially those with visible weapons yelling "I'M FRIENDLY PLEASE DON'T KILL ME!" All of us have that instinct to be afraid of the unknown, and to approach unknown situations with caution. Once we get enough knowledge of something we're afraid of, we better handle them. And we learn, if we survive, from those mistakes. At the very least, those who didn't survive teach others. Now, why not learn a fucking lesson here, and stop thinking that every person you see is there to hold your hand or is there to get a helping hand. Those who don't even ask questions have probably learnt the lesson a different way, like you have. But you put yourself in dumb situations simply just BEGGING others to be nice. It's unrealistic. However, I really do think its dumb that 50% of us just HAVE to kill eachother on sight. Come on, get some interaction and quit being such a damn loaner. That's why we got the multiplayer aspect here. Try talking things out and working on those skills, because they could save you when my group happens upon you.

I've owned a real set of TTSKO, and they're nothing compared to jeans when it comes to wear. It's old soviet crap. Mass produced, quickly, for a massive army. I agree with the Marine up above. Military gear is generally crap. I think a lot of those serving privately buy gear, like boots. When it comes to old Soviet states, its extremely common. They have companies in Russia that make military regulation gear, better than the military. Their soldiers then buy the higher end uniforms, which still have the same pattern and camouflage. I have friends with "tactical shirts", and they are indeed better than a "civilian" jacket. There's fashion and then there's function. Shirts and jeans (so far in this game) are of the fashion variety. http://www.warfightertactical.com/apparel/summit-softshell.html Look at that thing. You don't think it'd be better than... say a jean jacket? It's not any heavier than one either. And TTSKO pants are lighter than jeans. However, I agree that not every 10th building should be an Army Surplus store. But, as everyone's said, it's spawn rate should decrease. In game I prefer civilian rather than looking military. All comes down to what you'd rather look like in the game setting. Some people like Vanity, some like Function.

Happened to me. I started over. But you're right. I fucking forgot to make a thread on the forums and bitch about it. BRB

Titties

Yeah, and then make it so everyone has to use the same key configuration, mouse sensitivity, aspect ratio... Make everyone spend the same amount on a computer so everyone runs the game on the same settings. I'm exploiting the game because I bought a mouse that has an additional TWO BUTTONS compared to conventional mice. I'm exploiting everything up in this game. Don't be a Duh.

My friend and I were joking around. He punched me a few times, some in the face. I got dead rather than unconscious. So I'm going to go ahead and disagree with all of this.

Excellent.

I tried to come up with a logical argument against your suggestion. I don't think there really is one. Could just be bias because I think this just sounds more proper.

NOPE NOPE NOPE!

A friend of mine had recently found two Dews. He only had them for a few hours before he fell to his death off an apartment. I was in the super marker across the street. By chance I looked out onto the street at the very moment he falls from the building. Splat he goes in front me. I picked up the dews for him. Once we met up again, I passed them along and we didn't think much of it, but we later both died.