Grodenn

I like the idea with the nets and machine gun, as for bases I believe rocket are planning to make them instanced underground structures.

Nice idea :) +1. Addition to all stuff you need to find I think a nice challenge would be to have huge zombie hordes spawn ones you blow that satchel charge, so you basically need a team defending you while you are repairing it!

First of all alt f4 is a windows command so nothing anyone can do about that. Secondly there is 100 ways to do the exact same thing as an alt f4, pull your internet cable for example. Doesn't really sound like you thought this through enough tbh :P. Is this supposed to only happen when hit by a bullet? Then you are forgetting all situations where ppl disconnects when getting shot at (not hit), team mates logging off when their friend died etc. No I think the best solution is a simple logout timer that forces your char to be ingame for X amount of seconds (no matter if you just disconnect or use the logout button ingame).

No I think we should start with even less stuff than now tbh. It is way to easy to gather gear as well and really when the zombies are as weak as they are atm there is really no need for a starter weapon.

1. Go to youtube 2. Search "Dean 'rocket' Hall interview" 3. Click on anything that looks nice 4. ??????? 5. Profit

Yes I like it, BUT there needs to be a delay of at least 2h before you can view it maybe even 24h. Other wise it will just be used to get the position of the attacker and then relay that info to your friends.

It is a test for construction so there is a very valid reason to have them ingame. Also dead bodies is also causing the same type of graphical glitches.

For your first part, that is exactly why there should only be first person, simply would make the game harder which is good. As for the headbob you can turn that off in the options... no reason to complain about that at all.

To all the players saying don't force me to play in first person, I really find this stupid because you are effectively forcing a lot of players to play in third person right now, why? Simply because the majority of servers are third person and when filtering the dayz version, pings, the amount of players on the server (I only play on high pop servers) there are not that many servers left. Frankly when I looked for servers today on the dayzcommander client I could not find a single server that was running first person only. Even if I did it doesn't mean the server will be a good one where I don't have to be dragged down by bad fps. +1 for OP ALL your ideas are great. Oh and the graphics will be better in the standalone (RV4>RV3) and there will most likely be base building as well :).

Yeah it is slightly rough before you figure out how the zombies work. When you do you will realise how easy it is to dodge them and that it needs to be way harder :). One tip don't ever shoot zombies unless you ABSOLUTELY HAVE TOO. Zombies can't sprint in buildings so they are easy to get rid of in houses and they stop chasing you when you break line of site (most of the time anyway) so running into tree/bushes with a lot of leaves close to the ground is a good way aswell. Last tip do not ever run/walk standing up you will aggro zombies from like 500 meters away xd, when looting cities and towns always walk in crouch mode. GL and happy hunting :).

No way, we have way to much inventory space as it is imo. We should start with no backpack and make the Czech Vest Pouch the most common backpack in the game.

Fighting off zombies can be a fun game mode, but it is not dayz. If you want that type of game play go play left 4 dead which does this type of play very well so there is really no need for another game doing the exact same thing. Dayz should be kept as it is but expanded on the idea in the standalone.

Maybe you should keep yourself updated on the current development before posting shit? Rocket is working on this as we speak, 1.7.2.5 was suppose to fix the problems there is still glitches but from my experience it is a lot better than before.

you should search the forum and read the patch notes before posting useless posts...

Oh my can't understand why people bring in such stupid ideas over and over and over again..........

This have been suggested countless of times and is a really bad idea and doesn't fit with the game. The idea of the game is that you spawn in to an open world where you can do what ever you like. No restrictions, hence having a forced play style selection before you even start the game will ruin that concept. Another idea of the game is "if you can do it in real life you can do it in game" rocket gave the example if you can read the stars you can read the stars in game (this is actually a feature btw), and as far as I know he want to add more stuff like that. I would rather add more tools to the game that is needed to do more advanced stuff, say more medical tools for different type of wounds etc, then lower the amount of tool slots. That would in effect be some sort of 'class' system BUT you do not decide that before you start the game but rather while the game is going on. It also means you are never stuck with your choice and it leaves you open to do what ever you like to do, + it will add more combinations of different skill sets than a class system could.

do I smell a troll?

It's a good idea but have been suggested countless of times before, use the search function on the forums next time^^

Yes it is and that's why it is not in this game and why this game is great. Perma death is an important part of the game and removing that is just fucking stupid and would destroy any sense of paranoia. If anything death needs to be way more harsh you need to lose more from dying not less. It is way to easy to recover from a death, takes you like 10-60 minutes depending on spawn/luck, so no this game would be totally destroyed by a feature like this. Thankfully Rocket will never implement a stupid thing like this (he said him self in an interview he wanted to make death more harsh!).

I don't know about that, I have only had one encounter with a confirmed hacker (artillery on top of me), and one possible hacker encounter that might as well have been a bug (me and my friend just died randomly). I always thought it was a US server problem since I barley encountered any hackers. No I don't play on low pop servers, only login on 50-60 pop servers so I really don't understand all the whine I have seen far less hackers here than in any other game I played lol. OT: This idea is utterly ridiculously stupid and would only result in destroying the feel to the game. Yes it is sad that hackers exists but the worst thing you can do is to try to defeat them by destroying the game. It is like trying to fight terrorists that target your way of life by destroying your own way of life (Oh wait :rolleyes:).

Good idea! beans too you, also this could be mixed with the dog feature and would allow tracking people from a fireplace for x amount of minuets after the fire was put out.

Also would like to mention that cs:go basically got realised yesterday (access to beta if you buy it), and I'm sure a lot of players went to try that out :). 24h statistic's will not be an accurate measurement of how many people there is actively playing the mod. There will always be days with less people playing for different reasons, different days of the week, holidays, other game realises, extremely nice weather, etc. A way more precise number would be the amount of players per month.

Haha nice one, one have been cooler if you survived though :P. As for the embedding of youtube you can't use HTML code on the forums.

•Wrong, Xbox 360 and PS3 are on DX9. Yes, PC is on DX11, but that's not the point here. Yes it is because it means that the graphics will look way better on a PC rather than on a console. •Wrong, BF3's framerate is 30fps with vertical sync for both consoles, and can be put in 720p if you have an HDTV. Personally I can't really say anything to this since I don't have any facts, but I have a friend who played it who says it was a bit laggy and that he dropped in fps sometimes. •I wasn't saying COD is worth discussing. Ignore COD for now. ok •Wrong, as not all game trailers are filmed on the pc. How would they film console exclusives? /Facepalm ? You do realise that all games are made ON a pc right? •Wrong, PS3 is 6 years old, and both PS3 and Xbox 360 can run every game made nowadays. Proof that they are not outdated. Outdated wold mean that they cannot run it at all. And 100% + stronger doesn't make sense. No it only proves that the companies are sacrificing quality so they can sell the games on consoles, games like arma 2 will not be able to run on todays consoles BECAUSE their hardware is outdated... •Wrong, both Crysis 1 and 2 run well on Xbox and PS3, as will Crysis 3. Look at the point above •Plenty of games have daily/monthly updates. Example: Halo Reach. Okay that is good I guess •Wrong, toning down some features (which they aren't going to do) when putting DayZ on console has nothing to do with the PC version of DayZ. Useless point you have. Yes they are and it is a vary valid point, why should they make features for the PC version if they are not going to be in the console version that is a waste of programming resources if you could make features that can be run on both. Hence it will result in a dumbed down version to be able to run on a console. •Wrong, the Xbox 720 is coming out Christmas 2013, and PS4 is coming out either end of this year or middle of next. Okay while they will be able to run arma 3 for sure we will sooner rather than later have computers that have way better hardware and the same problem will arise again. •Wrong, if DayZ doesn't expand, it will die. PC-only games die out quickly, unless they have a console port. The War Z will suffer a similar fate, because that will be a PC-only game. Name a PC-only game other than an MMORPG that is still popular today. DayZ is not an MMORPG, so do not even try to say that it is. Haha are you serious? Counter-Strike which is still played today (yes I'm talking about 1.6), arguably the last year anyone will play it remotely serious but it is still a 12 year old game. Then we have Starcraft (1) which is also the last year that will be played but yet also a VERY old game. Name one game that have survived for that long on a console... well you can't because the console it self is not old enough ^^.

Actually the computer power doubles ever 18 months according to Moore's law ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law ) OT: I agree please do not bring dayz to consoles it will result in a dumbed down version of dayz and no one really wants that... (I hope =/ )