BL1P

Easier solution :- 1 char per server with bleeding offline

1 character per server. Bleeding offline. DC fixed Server swapping fixed .... Next ?

1 character per server bleeding offline problems fixed NEXT ?

from original post I agree off map should be stomped out. How its stopped I don't care as long as it is :)

1 char per server. Bleeding offline. fixes Dc and Server swapping problems.

1: One character per server. 2: Implementation of ACRE style radios via in-game VON. 3: Merge with ACE.

1 Character per server. And Bleeding while offline. Fixes the DC and server hoppers problems.

1 char per server Bleeding while ofline All dc and server hopping problems fixed

Good Idea asked for it a myself A.C.R.E used ingame rather than in ts3. http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?133891-A-C-R-E-Advanced-Combat-Radio-Environment-1-4-Stable-Release-Thread

I just spent quite a few days redoing my base camp since the tent wipe:( But I am sure this will happen at some point "ces la vie"

+1 worth testing at least

I know all the arguments on why people want 3rd on some servers. Here is why it shouldn't be on in DayZ It is and can be used as an exploit to see through, over or around objects you should not be able to see through, over or around in a FPS PVP modded game. Using the 3rd view exploit on one server then coming to a no exploit server with loot gained from an exploit is tantamount to cheating. To combat the exploits I would suggest one of the two following things. 1: make all DayZ servers one playing type with none of the exploits of 3rd or tags etcetc. This method makes all servers 1 difficulty setting and would create an even playing field across all severs. OR 2: Stop the ability to swap from one difficulty server to different difficulty server. This method would allow players who prefer the 3rd or tags exploits for what ever reasons to continue using 3rd etc but would allow the people who want untainted loot none exploit servers to have that aswell. Obviously playing on none 3rd would mean you cannot goto 3rd using servers aswell.

Convenient how you switched from only caring about people coming to your server with 'ill-gotten-gains' to caring about how this might actually affect anyone besides yourself. You dodged my point' date=' allow me to state it in a different way. Someone with NVGs at night vs. someone without NVGs at night is about as balanced as someone using 3rd vs. someone not using 3rd. In fact blindess is a bit more of a disadvantage than being able to see through/around walls at certain angles in certain situations. And rocket has NO INTENTION of nerfing NVGs in any way. [/quote'] O dear dear dear I haven't switched my views at all. when I say others I include myself. using a fairly gained pair of nvgs on a person who doesn't have the nvgs has no connection to a person using an exploit of the game to look through a solid wall to see a player on the other side. If you can not understand that simple concept......... " I have no words that would be appropriate to express my dismay. "

It isn't about me choosing for other people' date=' it is about universal fairness for a mod that will eventually become a final release MMORPG, where persistance matters, and because of player permadeath, that people might be able to kill you with equipment that they acquired by unfair means, and by using an exploit so in an unfair way, the game becomes broken, regardless of whether you use first or third person. ESPECIALLY if they decide to introduce a pay-monthly or pay-for-content system, which they may well do. Please watch your language, or I will report you to a moderator. Grow up, this is a suggestion thread, not a place for adolescents to redirect their sexual frustration. [/quote'] Arrogance rolls off of you in torrents. Comments about 'adolescents redirecting their sexual frustration' makes you seem the childish one here, much more so than a single use of the F-word. If you'd like I can link to plenty of quotes from rocket saying how the game is not and never will be balanced, and that this isn't a game in the traditional sense. It's art. A social experiment. The thought of this being a pay to play MMO would probably make rocket sick to his stomach. 3rd is about as fair as having NVGs on a night server. Shall I remove the choice you have to use NVGs when you remove the choice players have to play how they want? " 3rd is about as fair as having NVGs on a night server. " If the nvgs allow you to look "THROUGH" walls as 3rd does then the nvgs are glitched/exploitable and should be removed But as the nvgs do not do that your argument is flawed. Anything else ?

I would like to address this section :- ITS AN OPTIONAL THING. IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU. BUGGER OFF. ITS AN OPTIONAL THING. - Its optional yes. IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU. But it does effect others. This was explained multiple times if you cant grasp that concept its not anyone's fault but your own. BUGGER OFF.Although I like a bit of anal sex now and again I don't feel its your place to tell me I should get off on anal sex. Thanks for the thought though. I am thinking of you too.

+1 remove NVGs and thermals for a patch or two to see how this affects servers at night. I would also suggest capping brightness and gamma at 1.0 Because if the moon is out all you need to do is turn up brightness and gamma to max and you can see in the dark.Looks kinda like sin city :) which would defeat the point of the test. IMO

Good morning :) @ Sandy State Phantom Some nice analogies there m8. All valid points that I have been unable to put across to people through my lack of internetz forum speak skills. It goes beyond the obvious use of 3rd from cover or concealment though. 3rd can be used to look though walls while leaving you char impossible to see from the outside of the walls. I am not saying all people do this with 3rd, just that it is possible. The fact that its possible leaves the mod open to exploiters and I feel it should be addressed. along with all other exploits that are being addressed. (rearming of mags via disconnect for example) I have seen quite a few people say if you don't like it don't play on servers using 3rd. I just want to clear this point up. I do not play on servers with 3rd on in general. Especially if the mission involves PVP. I realise some people use 3rd as a starting point with arma or just because they prefer it. That is fine. Except that 3rd can be used to exploit and loot can be gained from that exploit which can then be used on a server which doesn't have 3rd on.Only in DayZ is this possible atm. My concerns over ill gained loot have been misunderstood aswell.(or poorly explined by myself which sounds more probable ). The loot I was referring to would be the loot gained from exploiting 3rd to get a pvp kill. Not the loot gained from looking in a building using 3rd view which you would not be able to do without the 3rd camera. Ok hope that helps clear some of the bad internetz forum skills of mine :) O yes I almost forgot .... using 3rd to exploit here are some quick examples I threw together. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDajUWWgGO0

@ BoOg Whats an epeen ?

Yes one char per server would eliminate allot of the problems. At no point was i trying to say that using 3rd alone is an exploit sorry if it came across as such. I was attempting to get across that using 3rd to exploit is possible and does happen even when the user doesn't realise this. One of the ways was explained quite eloquently by Callaghan. If you misunderstood my posts or my terminology led you to misinterpret them, Sorry and i hope this cleared it up for you. Im glad you agreed with option 2 though I feel all warm now :P Your title says it now your back tracking and trying to mislead people, and quit acting like you know inside and out of the gaming industry. obviously you haven't herd that the BIS devs say that in ways including the fact you have peripheral vision third person is a lot more realistic then first person. BTW I quote the whole thing I don't go around taking people out of context Where am I backtracking I still think 3rd can be used to exploit. I said I have beta tested games and spoken with devs about exploits.I don't claim to know the in and outs of the gaming industry just a working knowledge of some small aspects. BTW If you prefer walls of quoted text I can do that. not a problem I was just using the segments I was replying to not attempting to twist the context at all. No matter what you think.

@ Psyl3nt You just about missed the whole point of the post and rambled about nothing that I wrote about. Nice one.

Erm this video by an unknown amazing video editor. kinda relates to the none heterosexual side of this argument. In a kind of Monti Pythonesq style. Enjoy Forgive me if this is too off topic :(