imHark

Can you highlight all the answers in another colour please max? Thnx!

He did, the answer to which is not "Why shouldn't we be excited?" nor is it "Rv4 will have everything RV3 has but better". And its definitely not " Obviously a little bit of a communication error, people not understanding the question. I'm only posting here trying to explain to people because I want to know the answer too. I'd love to know what features and improvements to the engine we can look forward to in the RV4 engine.

Please read before you post. Ill even quote myself so as to explain again to you people who seem so adamant to not understand the question. Or read the comments in the thread besides the first one. Stop posting the same "WHY SHOULDN'T THEY".

Oh god, I tried reading through most of these comments but found it so hard... And made me disappointed in my fellow man. How can 70% of you post retarded comments flaming the OP saying of course they will move to VR 4 or saying "Why shouldn't they?" as if it answers his question. Let me explain. He's not asking whether they will, won't, should, could, have or can't use VR4 for DayZ. Hes asking WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS. Whats NEW with the VR4 engine, what's changed, what runs smoother, what new features are enabled. I personally don't know the full answer but I know the maps are bigger at least. And optimized for longer view distances I think. Oh and fully enterable buildings is very exciting for me.

This must be troll. He's said he doesn't want to go free to play because he doesn't want money to have any effect on the game, IE: No pay to win. He's also already mentioned the price model, pre-order early and you get to play the alpha and beta and get the game on release. The Minecraft model. Please don't post this stuff without checking it out, even if you're just saying you're worried about it. You wouldn't have the feeling its going to go downhill if you read what rocket has said.

I asked him the same question at Rezzed, "If you go standalone will you use the Arma 3 engine?" His answer was super vague and seemed like either he didn't want to make promises he might not be able to keep or perhaps it would be a lot of work rebuilding dayz on the arma 3 engine. He HAS heaped a lot of praise on the arma 2 engine on countless occasions. Perhaps he thinks keeping it on the arma 2 engine would be best? Oh his answer was something like "Bohemia will support the mod if it goes standalone, the arma 3 engine is very good" or something to that effect. It was a while ago.. :<

We have a bunch of regulars on UK126, Im sure you could find a group to join :)

Sent you a PM