ZombieSpecialist

Thanks for the input. It's highly appreciated.

I have never alt+F4, and even if I wanted to I can't, my keyboard doesn't allow it. You might be highly camo'd, well done if you are. It should take me less than 10 minutes to find you after you shoot, mind.

I don't get upset or mad, I get more focused. And kill you. It's very simple.

I represent you, and anyone like you. Don't worry work is being done against this.

I agree with most of the points above, but although it would be easier to have a loyal spotter next to me, I don't need one. Already about 25-30 snipers killed in the last couple of days. I'd say that's pretty effective. No deaths yet, and no one has spotted me. Let's say my hiding place... is... a little unorthodox.

As I've already stated I camp for GOOD reasons. Anyway you'll disagree with that. And yes, I can take out 7 man teams because you'll never know where I am. Literally. There's a very small chance you'll find out where I am hiding. So then I wait until someone goes on a roof, or a hill to snipe and then, again, as previously said: you die. Your 7 man team can do what they want... but they're not getting onto a vantage point to snipe. That's all I'm saying.

So... many... !!!!'s

Potentially the best title of a thread I've ever seen on the internet.

Oh, you're mistaken. I'm not mad.... I'm focused. On killing every one of them, and so far I'm doing very well. The problem is you can't go out in the open, even though there are no zombies. And why can't you go out in the open to travel more effectively? Because there's always a douchebag sniping.

Okay. You will die. By my hands.

I can't risk the following: a ) anyone killing me. Because that will waste time trying to get a sniper again etc. so I can't trust anyone. You can't blame me, right? b ) my spot being detected. c ) anyone else thinking they can take the law into their own hands. Leave this shit up to the big boys.

I don't need squad mates, I am indeed a lone wolf. To say "with the exception of sniping in Cherno" is, again, ridiculous. Why are you just randomly making exceptions? When I kill you, and your "squad" is there to back you up, I might retreat. Plus I'm heavily camouflaged, I could lay still and still be easily undetected. I will take on a squad of 10+ if I know they are a danger to the city. Don't worry about that.

My friend. I am working hard to make Cherno a place anyone can join without fear of snipers. That is all.

Why do people risk this? Chances are you will die.

Hmmm, two things that are wrong with this post. a) To assume that the only reason you kill people with a sniper is because you "know they would've shot me the minute they saw me" is a ridiculous presumption. Not only because a lot of people ARE friendly, but because it's not "kill or be killed" it's you just killing. It's not as if you see someone from afar and think "they will kill me so I should kill them". You will never meet.... you could avoid them. Ridiculous statement. Number two, I love and hate how you said "would enjoy the challenge of a fair fight" - I don't think you would, because chances are you would die - you're only used to killing people who are innocently running along and who cannot fight back. I was recently watching a tiger documentary, and ones accused of man-eating were kept in prisons. But a millionaire wanted to free them into the wild, and did. But some tigers got so accustomed to being fed dead meat, they would probably die in the wild because they would have lost most ability to hunt. This is the same situation, you're so used to killing people who a) very likely cannot fight back B) are an easy kill. So tell me, what do you do when you come up against someone who isn't easy to kill and are very capable of fighting back? You become the tiger who starved to death.

No sweat.

If you are in Cherno: stay there. This will be good. If you think you are safe in another city killing innocents, it will only be a matter of time until the number of snipers in Cherno on a three hour basis drops below 0.33, to the point where I move city. If you are in the area I move to, count yourself already dead.

I am serious guys, of the 10 servers I frequently visit, the number of snipers in a three hour time span has decreased to under 2.00, when only two days ago it was at over 6.00. I'm making a difference. But let's be clear to people out there, this is a job only I should do. It's boring and requires god-like sniping.

Thanks for that wonderful input.

I have good news for all of you. So far I have DESTROYED 14 snipers in Cherno in the past day. Two have come back for their stuff, only to be killed again. It's almost like I'm one with the grass. And do you know what? I was prone when someone ran past me... I thought "I'm running low on food here..." and instead of getting an EASY kill, I ran into the city to get food/drink. I felt bad for even thinking it... but then my sniping abilities improved after this. Also, I've saved 3 people from definite death. One guy was only about 30 metres in from of me, zigzagging like hell getting sniped. It only took me 5 seconds to find the sniper on a building, scoped in and killed the fucker. The guy who I saved stopped... and this might be wishful thinking but he looked at me for a split second laying down on the grass and it was almost like he thanked me. I've server hopped 8 times in order to find them, and believe me I have. Snipers, I'm still coming for you. And getting more fucking experience as each day goes by. My hunger for you grows.

In my quest for batman-esque justice (minus the no guns rule), I factored that in.

Good question. I'm assuming that if that does happen I'll never find out about it... so no guilt. Majority of them will be arseholes, I'm going with that :)

You'll have to forgive me, not only is sarcasm impossible to detect on the interwebz, but some people would genuinely have said something as ridiculous as you without joking :)

The above logic makes no sense. The difference is that they're camping to kill friendlies, or people who are NEW to the good. I'm camping to kill the people that kill innocent guy's trying to learn how to play the game. And "whiners moaning about whiners" makes no sense either. I'm not complaining that they're killing friendlies, and then going on a rooftop and killing friendlies. It's a totally different scenario you fail to comprehend. And yeah, Liam Neison should have gotten quoted, I agree.

That's wrong. You had no idea he intended to "come back and hatchet you" lol I think I should be the moral police on this thread. I'll determine (no matter the complexity of the kill) whether it was justified or not :)