ProGrasTiNation

First off im one of those heads that usualy hang back & only come out with my voice if there was some retarded gameplay element going to be added to the show. but i think adding player to player transfusion as another way of getting some blood back would really add to some teamplay,it would have to be any option both parties agree to before the procces could be started & maybe even add in the option to have a %chance of curing someone that was sick if you were the healthy donor. You could as far as lets say you keep the i.v after use but using it again you risk picking up serious illness,so theyre is a need to always find clean equipment. Also why not have the i.v as a necessary part for using a blood bag on another player,that comes with the same penalties of using a used i.v. & just in case your wondering yes your blood goes down & the person giving the blood would have the option to stop the transfusion before his blood got to low,but hey why not make it so if youre blood got to low you fainted & the other player would get the option to keep taking blood or cut the transfer(i think someone out there with a wireless keyboard or mouse would go wired if that got them killed LOL) Sorry if that wall of text hurt yours eyes but i thought this to be a very good idea that needed to be put out there. Peace out!

ye i agree the blood bags need a nerf & also the getting 3k off of meat is a bit overpowered,but hey its an alpha & thats whats needed is good feed back from people who want a hard game that rewards the time you put into it. i like!! would be awesome to have that kind of risk added to the system

I dontno,groups might become even worse if they can hoard blood like that.

As long as you cant put those cans away for later im all with this idea

Dude i was keeping that for another thread lol...i would love to have cannabilism in this game Its a valid point you've brought up but i think we could sort that by lets say your charactor starts with a player card when you spawn,your name & blood type would be on the card making the people with blood type -o a valuble asset/friend.Another way around it is to just ignore it & just add it for the good gameplay it would hopefuly bring to the table.

Cool idea but i think groups would abuse it & make newbies lives even worse then it is now,thats why iv stated the need for some type of 2 player approval so you couldnt go around taking blood easily.Also i would like it so if you were doing it for 30 seconds you wouldnt get much blood at all,,maybe a 100 or so.

I like the idea of meat going off,would stop people hording meat & only going out hunting when needed.

Good points but i think if your going to be doing a transfusion it should take a lot longer than it is now anyway,you should be very vunurable if your going to be doinging anything that revolves around gaining blood back.& in regard to how much blood do you give up,well you have 12000 blood so its up to you how much you give away.But as i stated you risk disease & possible unconsious.

I hope dean removes large sections of track becaues of this idea,,,just my opinion

I dont think you should have help on the loading screens,its about survival & freedom. I think its much better having people learn the hard way about doing things (like runnig towards gun fire)& they would feel much more of a reward because of it,,i no i did anyway.

was thinking this very thing last night while pondering some ideas,,,,id love to see it happen but the performance hit might be an issue

So no interest in player to player transfusions? I think it would be a seriously good thing to have in the game no!

well yes that is what an i.v is,but yes rare bloodbags would be good start.

im thinking the i.v is a seperate component to the blood bag & can be used to do the Player to player if you used up all your bloodbags,the blood bag would need an i.v to be used on a player making giving blood harder than it is now.Dont we all want a harder game?

no iv been playing a long time now

Sorry i forgot to add in player to player