Lady Kyrah

I would love to get more content, more stuffs to do, discover and all, but nothing that says "elite zombie dungeon"

Are you skipping on your medications again? I'm not against sniper rifles, it's just that those .50 cal are only popular with gamers and gun nuts that own it just for bragging and hardly ever take it to a range that can exploit it's capabilities. In the hands of a civilian it's makes as much sense as a desert eagle for home defence. Basically it's neither realistic nor serious.

There is no levels or progression beyond looting gears why are you guys so much into "endgame" content. This is a term that belong to PvE MMOs

Sprint 2xW is faster than normal running and gradually slow down as you start panting. It's good for short distances, then it's just the same as running.

I can see so many peoples getting killed in their sleep :/

Yeah but you don't get to decide at the moment so it doesn't really matter wether you enjoy them or not. It's actually a good thing, to me.

So when do i get my handcuffs? :D

There is no such thing as ownership in the game so far. And i hope it stays that way. No ownership, only what you can carry, and what you can defend.

So you didn't really work it out:D

From what i gathered Rocket doesn't want private servers, it's everyone play together, for the best and the worst, no clans making their BS little rules on their server or banning whoever piss them off.

Yeah but those rifles are mostly for disabling radar equipments, stationary aircrafts and the like. Any armored vehicle is normally impervious to a .50 and any car/truck can be made quick work of with any assault rifle anyway. They just propagate the "my gun is bigger than yours" mentality. And that's an interesting idea, IF a couple equipments where using the backpack slot.

I do want orange jumsuits, handcuffs and leg irons in dayZ. But i don't think it's a good starting equipment.

I think the OP deserve the flack he's getting simply for his inability to express his idea in a simple and concise way, redirecting people to a lengthly explication on some download site, and then blaming them for not doing so. Nobody here is on you payroll dude, it's up to YOU to keep your audience listening, and you failed to do that. All i see is an extremely convoluted "solution" to the server hopping issue, which you obviously are very concerned with (and that's fine). But this approach is ridiculous. Have you forgotten how many bullets it takes to kill someone in this game? That's right, one. And you want to put automatic guns that fire on anyone "trespassing" what you believe is your property. Like we don't have enough peoples randomly firing at eachothers already. You could have suggested camo netting, buried crates, dismantling vehicles and all kinds of passive, furtive solutions but instead, i suppose you have this dream of making a fort that everybody know about and nobody can approach, to protect "your property". There is a reason why i personally am against things that recognise the player, it's because property rights do not exist in nature. If a player can take something, it's his as long as he has the means to keep it. The barb wires need a reasonable way to be bypassed, and so do any defence systems. I would love trip wire grenades and the like, as long as the wire is visible to a careful player.

It still doesn't answer my question to the OP. What does making tents a starting item "add" to the DayZ experience. Also, what does it remove from the experience. Come on sell your idea a bit better.

Not in eastern europe :D

What does this suggestion add to the games? Where does it makes it more interesting? To me this is just a request for instant gratification.

So basically you find the freedom of action awesome, excepted when it's being used against you. I had to point that out. It's not freedom of action if it's constrained in the kind of freedom that doesn't inpede your playstyle. Hey it's okay i understand it, you are okay with PvP as long as it's on your own terms. We are all a bit like this because it sting when it's like there was nothing you could have done. But that's what DayZ is.

I'm not gonna go grammar nazi, but am i the only one who has trouble to even understand this suggestion?

I wanted to add a comment about the OP. Not every games have to favor good sport, fair play and honor, check EVE online for a good example.

Well the point is to offer suggestions. There is no "implementation process" not by popularity, not by vote or anything. Post your suggestion and if the devs feel they are filling something that suit their game vision they might implement it.

There should be about 1/4 of the crate sticking out :D Seriously the game shouldn't provide any way to hide items in such a way that they are impossible to find unless you knew the exact location beforehand.

The "point" of pure deathmatching in DayZ is basically a mix of trolling and simply having it easy. I do not see any way to separate the occasional killing for stuff/fun and the systematical DMing for the lulz. For me it's okay to ruin someone's day every now and then, even if there was no reasons. It's a distraction mixed with a little bit of cruelty. But just DMing in cherno because you can? that's dumb. It's exactly the same issue you have on "GMOD RP" servers where some peoples just connect to mess with you, and once you start having "rules of engagement" everyone start taking advantage of it, playing victim.

Personally i think players should simply learn to orient themselve, with or without a map.

It already exists in the main game :)

One thig you have to keep in mind is that this mod is not a democracy, this is a "suggestion" forum, not a "community vote" forum. Ultimately Rocket will do what the hell he wants with his mod, wether it ends up pushing away a part of the community or not. What is up with people who always assume that modders wish to please their community at any price, modders start their project first and foremost for themselve, not for you, me or anyone else. Thinking that something will happen jsut because "the majority wants it" is kidding yourself. From my experience as a game designer, there is one thing players are extremely good at, it's making bad suggestions. A player generally see the game from his own little corner of it and fail to grasp the big picture of how the different mechanics interact with eachothers. They also generally fail to grasp the vision of the developpers which is not always obvious or in line with what the players think the game is about. An example, i played a mars colony simulation beta game, you could play with 4 other players and had various objectives to fullfill. Initially you think having everyone out and about is the most efficient way to do things. Then you realise you need a player at any time in the main module to warn the others in the event of a storm and to quickly fix eventual breaks in the life support systems. When a storm hit, everyone HAS to find shelter until the storm end and there is basically nothing to do until then. That was a concious design decision to make players interact with eachothers and talk during this time but so many moaned and thought "storms should be shorter".