Bipedalius

That's just ridiculous. The animals would always be dead in that case, making food incredibly scarce. They'd have to add more animal spawns and a lot of them for it to work.

Exactly. One of the reasons I suggested it.

What I believe should be implemented is the ability to make spears (also throwing spears if you will) from tree branches/twigs. This should be implemented considering it's rather obvious that people would do this when lacking any weapons but being lucky enough to wield a knife. Or you could tie the knife on the end of a stick with some sort of tie/belt. And the ability to skin an animal and use it's hide for clothing. Hey, we're kind of back to the Stone Ages anyway! Also, wooden bows and arrows. :lol:

I think this idea was meant to be a bit humoristic. I for one sure as hell laughed while reading it.

Makarov PM

I bet you actually talk like that.

Needing a generator to prevent zombies to spawn in the town is a ridiculous idea, I'd vote for the original idea of this suggestion.

If everyone would say ''yes'' or ''no'', no one would get to know the reason as to why they said it, giving people less things to consider and discuss. Humanity wouldn't be as rich of knowledge today if everyone just said ''yes'' or ''no''. Stop being such a wuss.

Yeah I'm not really sure what he meant either. Sinaz are you insane though? Why on Earth would you suggest such a thing?

Well, why shouldn't players camp indoors? I mean everyone are doing it already when they've got a horde of zombies after them. Plus, there's really not a lot of enter-able buildings in a town as it is now. But I'd support your idea yeah, since I believe they should remove the ''zombies walking indoors'' completely since it's kind of weird and a letdown, but that shouldn't happen before the zombies stop zig-zagging and maybe get decreased speed, to balance it.

I feel like they should focus more on the zombie AI at the moment.

No Lachmayne, no loot should spawn when a town is liberated. If it would spawn loot, you can only guess how players would react. Me, I'd guess everyone would just sit on their ass waiting for the loot to spawn.

Exactly Dreganius. If it would be as danile666 suggested, it really wouldn't make sense to liberate a town at all since you would run out of ammo pretty fast because it would turn out like some Tower Defense game. @bad_mojo that would just be another excuse to stop being at risk of getting killed by another player and it would also lower the constant paranoia level because everyone would believe that no one's going to fire a shot since it would spawn a horde of zombies coming at them.

To be honest, I think that would pretty much cleanse the zombie population by half, since there could be (or was) players 200 meters from each other, making the zombies unable to spawn. Also from what I heard (may or may not be true), zombies spawn when there are/were players nearby.

If people find this idea to apparently be too ''script-based'', you could change the suggestion to something like ''Zombies spawn outside towns'', which would make zombies to not (re)spawn in towns, but rather further away from towns, and from there they would wander until they reach into a town, so you could set up blockades around the town and shoot zombies on sight. Now, I'm not sure, but I believe this wouldn't need as much scripts (if any at all).

Um no.

From my point of view, there aren't even enough of the flexible sort of supplies in DayZ.

If they take away third-person (which I hope not), I'm pretty sure they'll lose a lot of players. I would actually stop playing this game if that happened.

Serrath, that still wouldn't be the same at all. It would be extremely frustrating when you start thinking. You would need a lot of wires (or any of the blockade sort) and clean out zombies in the way and at the same time look out for players wanting to kill you (almost a certainty), and also encourage players to help AND explain how you want it built. In theory it would work, but the idea Dreganius has would simply be so much better and also more fun.

I'd vote for infected, making it more realistic whilst also more of a challenge since they would have speed, kind of like they would have the Rage virus (from ''28 Days Later'' movie/book), which would pump adrenaline into the body all the time, ultimately turning the infected into anti-exhaustive powerhouses. However, they still need to fix the zig-zag movement.

Exactly my thoughts, Daniel! The ''Anyone in Cherno?'' would be absolutely fantastic. Except the smiley holding the gun would have to go.

Rask you'll have to admit though that Ipod732 is shockingly smart for a 14 year old. Are you really 14 years old?!

I would have to agree, zombies respawn WAY too fast.

How about making food less effective and take a longer time to eat each time after you've been drinking a soda, since it contains so much sugar which corrodes your teeth? No but seriously soda is good as it is, it's already hard to get your hands on some freshwater.