

ADSL4678
Members-
Content Count
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by ADSL4678
-
Many thanks to the developers for the new skybox. This will definitely bring a little newness to the game. However, the issue of the return of volumetric clouds and more complex and variable weather (as in 0.62 or 0.63) remains relevant. And several interesting photoshop selections. p.s. I saw at the end of the developers' stream that the clouds are now moving!!! Thank you dear developers, you are the best!!!
-
Dear developers, please give us back the sky and weather from 0.63 beta. They were great - it greatly increased the attractiveness and atmosphere of the game. What we have now is just zero compared to the sky from 0.63 From a technical aspect, I think it will not be so difficult, since 0.63 is already enfusion, there are a lot of references to SimulWeather in the 1.19 code, 0.63 files are in the public domain. @Kyiara
-
Please do it. Without it, the game looks inferior. The current sky looks like a cheap decaration. In terms of synchronization and performance, one could use solutions from Arma Reforger - it seems like the same engine (enfusion) there. Moreover, if this is the question, I think that many players are even willing to sacrifice weather synchronization for the sake of a complete survival atmosphere.
-
Strange. The game engine since 0.63 is enfusion. In my opinion, if the engine is the same and it worked then, then it can work now. Moreover, Arma Reforger also uses enfusion and there are quite good volumetric clouds.
-
I hope the developers read this. I think the atmosphere is a very important part of the game.