phorest

No, these are new player things. Very basic things that you'd know if you played ARMA for more than 15 minutes or bothered to look up a tutorial, or even if you had just looked in the options.

You could try shooting it down and see if it crashes. If it does they'll die and you'll see their names.

N00b

It's still a boring idea. Plus it would attract a bunch of newbies as they'd go "ooh safezone lets meet some people!" which would attract bandits that love to prey on newbies. Same problem as the safe zones idea has except this one is even less protective considering the NPC's can be killed.

You realise that having NPC guards that shoot at people that shoot at other players is pretty much the same as having safe-zones, right? Bad idea.

This pretty much. Please stop looking so far into things.

Either way, the amount of pretentious posts on this forum is overwhelming. Admittedly, yours isn't as bad as others I've seen but I'm actually getting irritated by the amount of these kinds of posts there are. The reasons I mentioned for people shooting on sight is basically all it comes down to. And the scoring system is still bullshit since it's completely subjective of what is beneficial to oneself and what isn't.

... What are you talking about? People don't choose scenario A because, firstly, killing other people is fun in the game. Secondly, people shoot on sight because they want to either keep their own loot as they can't be bothered/don't want to get back their gear or they just want the other person's gear. It doesn't go much further than that. Plus all you've done is make up a bullshit scoring system for the three scenarios in order to back up your little theory.

Sigh. Must people look too far into things?

Lol.

Why do people post this on here? It's not even relevant since people don't go through these emotions (unless you're a hyper-sensitive bitch) in DayZ.

I'd only take the FAL if you were going to play at night a fair amount. If you're not then there's no point taking it. But in response to your question I believe it is more accurate and more lethal over longer ranges.

This kid has no clue.

You realise ARMA 3 was being developed before DayZ right?

Not quite what I said but ok.

What's your point?

People who bought ARMA solely for DayZ (and then don't even try ARMA) are retarded enough, but then those that expect to not have to pay, or at least get a discount, on the stand-alone version are even more retarded.

Worst idea ever.

great vid bro

@renulan unfortunately we want more traffic on server so we're using 3rd person again.

FAL has nightvision scope, not thermal.

Shut your face baddie.

People like you need to shut up. Just the title alone ... "An Inner Look at the Economics and Psychology of Banditry". Are you kidding me? It's a fucking game.

Where is that?

Are you dumb? Or just dumb?