Space Milk

1:People will just ask others to kill them, TOTALLY NULLIFYING THIS. 2: Smaller or new servers would be more empty and bigger and well known servers would be filled more. Why? Because everyone would be going to populated servers to find someone to kill them. This means that it is harder for new servers to start up.

So basicaly he should turn around and walk right into the zombie? Because that's what your saying, "360 degrees."

Why not allow people to access logs? Report it, have servers ban the person, maybe get battleye to ban them too. Add a tag to this guy as, "known hacker"

You think you are offended? Us Pepsi drinkers ain't gunna let this pass.

No, it isn't especially if you are mildly cautious. Just have everyone spawn in one place, this suggestion has too many downsides.

And so what about people spawning in Elektro? Unfair advantage by chance? Scrap this terrible idea, make everyone spawn in one place, with no chance of spawning someone else.

SL: RHOi

1: Jesus christ if you don't understand it you could at least educate yourself between postings on the ideology I mentioned, libertarianism, and you would have a better chance of understanding it, and my view.SNOWDEN, did a expose on this thing violating privacy rights, EVEN THOUGH it helps the security of the people. The libertarians view is RIGHTS AT ANY COST. Snowden is libertarian. Craux, who I am guessing is libertarian wants players(relate to people) to be able to use pen and paper, even though it might offend people, and from what you are saying, kill people. This is also a libertarian view. When craux said stupid leftist liberal retards, that doesn't mean libertarians. Libertarians are not necessarily left, or usually included on the left. He is excluding himself. These "liberal retards" he mentions, are what he believes are the kind of people who don't want this coming back. Snowden is a self proclaimed libertarian. He is not hypocritical when he mentions stupid leftist liberal retards because it doesn't include, most of the time, libertarians. And he is assuming that these ar the people who want to, in a sense, restrict free speech, in a game. 2: Can be sex, oral sex, foreplay, or just doing the project he wants you to do in a way he doesn't want you to, but ends up doing better than his suggestion and you get rewarded. 3: I'm not because that is not what I am arguing for right now, and I think it has been discussed to death and has won countless of times that discrimination must be confronted, so I will not be doing a replay. Yes I have. I was suicidal myself, though that is a part of my life I wish to forget. When people write bad stuff on paper in a game, it is not directed at anyone. That is the major difference between that and many situations in real life where it is directed. If it was directed in the game, THEN I would approve some form of punishment for the attacker, but when you broadly attack, like spraying a .22 machine gun 360 degrees, not only will you rarely even affect some one significantly, it will likely not push that person to depression, or death in this case, unless already heavily injured mentally, or physically in this case. If the person was, mentally hurt, then that person should know that the Internet is a hate spewed place because people do what ever they want here, and they want to do whatever they want like children, which means acting foolish. If a person who is weak goes into the internet, or the battlezone, and he comes across a comment that hurts him, or a stray bullet from 22 spray hits him, then it is their fault. They knew the dangers to their mental health, and should have made a wiser choice. The internet is ubiquitous now. No reason to say "I didn't know." 4: Yes it is, it is telling you there is no proof, argument, nothing, which means it should be dismissed as it has no value, You need a argument, no matter how much "the dots connect." 5: No, but the word wealthy and it's antynoms doesn't say anything about living in a shack and being poorer than dirt. 6: Should we do away with autistic too? Down syndrome? If you haven't noticed, as I am guessing you might be focused on retard (the word not your patients) people are saying "lol im autistic. LMFAO nigga got down seendrum bro" Doesn't matter how defined they are, society is going to take every word related to a negative condition and use it as a bat. I never said tests measure intelligence. The standardized testing here is the same, limited and such, Tests really only measure knowledge (which hopefully you know is different from intelligence) and the application of knowledge (which has ties to intelligence, but if they don't have the technique, this won't even matter) What the fuck, where did I say you must be black or retarded to be offended. I experience racism all the time, no big deal, and I am not black, and most likely not retarded as I have this level of knowledge at my age and I am writing to you a well thought response. (compared to what most people would do) They are a VERY good part of the economy. If mentally retarded people and disabled people didn't exist, it could be billions ripped off the US and maybe the world. The amount of money spent on them makes them a vital part of the economy. I would go so far to say that they are even more integrated than normal people, there are specialized products designed for this minority, they are practically a product themselves, in the economic point of view, of course they aren't actually products. Technically, it IS their right to empower themselves by belittling others. Most people use retard not as a offense to retards, but as offense to their friends not around retards or just making foolish remarks around family and such. With the rise of the internet people are sharing these remarks and insults publicly, which mental retard caretakers like you take notice and make it a public issue. 7: Discriminated? Yes, so were all races and minorities. Whites, hispanic, but none more than blacks. Blacks have been ENSLAVED, is that worse than what happened with this minority, or whites, who were also enslaved to a point? EDIT: About stupidity No it isn't. I am afraid you don't understand genetics, which is surprising considering you are a mental retards caretaker. Stupid people MIGHT have stupid children because if their sex partner is smart or has many recessive genes for intelligence (which we have little idea what they are) and the stupid person also has these recessive genes for intelligence, then during meiosis the independent assortment might result in the recessive genes coming together, and hopefully you know some genetics to know the rest. If you don't, recessive genes together make them expressed, so the child is intelligent, but because so many genes are there for intelligence, she still might be a carrier for stupidity, or at least a limited form of it. Intelligent people can have recessive genes for stupidity, so EVERYONE has a chance of having stupid children. Why? Not just because of above but also because of mutations (which I will assume you do not know, even though YOU SHOULD KNOW since that is precisely what is the main cause of mental retardation) which are natural, sometimes unnatural, changes in DNA, or errors. There are many kinds of mutations, won't go into that, nor how they are caused. But if a person is stupid he cannot become intelligent, although it is possible for him to become knowledgable, but unlikely because he os stupid. Everyone has a chance of a stupid child, Everyone has a chance of a intelligent child. Everyone has a chance of a retarded child. Everyone has a chance of a dead child. I hope this crash course on rough genetics has helped you, but you can look up videos for it, which I HIGHLY SUGGEST, considering what you do. Crash course biology by the blog brothers are great. Besides genetics there is also EPIGENETICS, which I won't even be touching that can of worms, you can find some videos, including on crash course biology, or the science channel made by the same guy, not the same channel.

What does this have to do with pen and paper?

IMHO a feature like this should be added, but because it is nasty and it is alpha we should poo bunnies.

Curious cats get run over. Watch out.

What if your old and kinky?

1: He was campaigning because the government was violating our rights, and the consititution. To preserve as many rights as possible is a libertarian view. The person you attacked was maintaining that exact view. He wanted people to be able to write notes regardless of racism. That's libertarian. His picture isn't hypocritical. Snowden: Violating privacy right for security, fights for rights Craux: Preventing players from being able to do something for less offense, fights for rights (in a sense, not literally) 2: No, you don't have to. You don't have to listen to your boss, if you don't you get fired, or maybe you do something extra extra special and you don't. Whatever. I agree with discrimination needs to be confronted. Thing is there is no discrimination in this game. People write bad racial stuff on paper in a game. Yet it is not infringing on rights, nor is it preventing blacks or whatever to do what most people do. Well it sickens me too. So lets remove a feature on a game because someone is saying bad stuff about that group to make hinself feel better. Yes people are offended, but have you realized how many people of the attacked are not offended? In real life what do you do to make a bully stop without violence or telling administration who do nothing? You ignore them. It's the best tactic against this hate speech. No one gives a audience, levels lower. Education then will fully destroy their ignorance. Intimidated, by what? By offensive people on the forums? If so then what? They are intimidated, but they aren't letting it ruin their day, if so, it is their fault they are coming everyday to read this stuff to hurt themselves. Even more so they know, or should know, the forum rules, so they can report peope as they please, and mods determine whether, like your post, is attacking and uncontributing. Stupidity only "grows" by sex. If stupid people have sex, they might have stupid children. Ignorance can "grow" if proper education is not administered and, if they have ideas that are wrong, if they spread it around and convince others, which only really happens to children, or people who are not firm in their belief that it is wrong and what not, which means they are ignorant too. 3: It's still a event, whether you like to call it that or not. 3 people are shot in the house, would you call it a massacre? I would not "like" to call it that but it is a massacre. Would you call a 6 year old forcibly kissing girls without consent sexual harassment (story on news)? I wouldn't but technically it is. Although the kid shouldn't be punished. 4: Well ok, I was attempting to show you how these points are wrong and whatnot, including lack of proof. 5: a. One that fails consistently, especially a person with bad luck or poor skills In the dictionary. Drawing penises and a symbol doesn't make him a loser by this definition. Masturbating doesn't make a sinner or loser (I don't believe in god just trying to relate to you) I can still repent and get a job and have a wife. 6: Retarded is the proper term for "intellectually disabled" children. Retarded means slow. I don't understand why other people would call them intellectually disabled, because that is literally calling them stupid, when they are just slow in certain areas. Intellectually: intelligence Disabled: capped off at a point, unable to reach full potential So, this means, a person whos intelligence in certain areas is capped off, unable to be reached. He cannot go over what the disability sets him at. A person who compared to normal people in terms of science, has their maximum intellectual capacity lowered, meaning, they will never be able to achieve what a normal person can. Retarded means slow, it might take time and there is obstacles but it can still be reached. Retarded is being turned into a synonym with stupid. Well guess what, people are turning cook into a synonym with diss, or mock. Kids and young adults are usually the only people saying this. Usually they don't even mean offense. Not all of the mentally retarded are offended. Same as not all blacks are offended by nigger. Nigger was startwd during slavery, a time of oppression for slaves, (not just blacks thank you) retard started out as medical terminology and was used for the original IQ scale. There was no opperession. 7: Yes, and I am stating that also applies to you.

Yup. If your mom went psychotic and tried to hurt you with a knife, would you put her down folks?

I was in the forest and heard zombies. Since I had no weapons I got scared, crouched and look around. Heard it again much closer, I went prone (dumb idea) and saw a bunny in front of me. Turns out bunnies are zombies.

Antibiotics are useless against viruses/virons.

What, and end up like that one guy? Solid idea for reals though.

Holy shit. ALL THIS TIME I thought Bambi was a girl. Watched the movie, read the book. I though he was a she...

Well I hear the term Bambi ALOT when bandits want to go to the southern cities for activities. The activity? Bambi hunting as they call it. One of my friends teamed up with other friends he met and he asked me if I wanted to go bambi hunting with them in Balota but I had to go so no.

Isn't a bandit anyone who kills for loot and supplies? No questions asked? Make it their only way of doing it? Peope who just kill are maniacs and psychos. People like you are just survivors.

I don't know. I heard it once and now its stuck. The only other terminology which I use, barely, is newspawn. I guess, bambis, are young weak and recently born versions of their parents, big and strong. Bambi is also female, so I guess by using a sexist stereotype this means newspawn are pussies? Well, it's half true. IMHO Newspawn goes better than fresh spawn. You even have to seperate the 2 words in fresh spawn, otherwise it is ugly. Newspawn almost sounds like a fish, or real name.

It's a alpha... You bought this game to help develope and test. No refunds.

The bigger problem is opening a door with a gun with a magazine. You shouldn't make yourself vulnerable by putting it down or switching to something else.

His post, was not directly attacking anyone. His post, was his opinion, a RELEVANT OPINION, on this subject. Yours, however, directly attacks him, and does not directly contribute to the topic at hand. The mods have no reason to edit his post, only yours. He is naive? You are naive. You should quickly realize this. If you really want to get further, then you should take it to debate.org. 1: Snowden isn't a extremist, and he isn't liberal. HE IS LIBERTARIAN. Big difference. And libertarian, although left, is not exactly left like modern liberalism. A straight left-right chart cannot fully explain where libertarian sets on. He isn't a hypocrite, you are just ignorant on Snowden's views. 2: No, he doesn't have the authority. The same as other people do not have the authority to tell people not to do porn, who to hang out with, not to curse friends out, etc, etc. Thing is, all these things, are very strong recommendations. When you become a adult, you no longer have to listen to all these people. They no longer have authority over you and can give you orders, but they can give you very strong recommendations. It is important to listen to these people, and seriously consider them until you reached a certain unmarked level of wisdom. Same with what he is talking about. Sure he has no authority, but should you really be offended by many things society says and does? Would you seriously have that ruin your day? Not only is that detrimental to mental health, but likely, as you are doing, you would try to restrict what they can say and do, that offends them. It's called being mature. You aren't a kid that is grossed out by boobies and dicks, love and kissing, broccoli and brussels sprouts, or whatever you were grossed out by besides these generic stuff. You are a adult, and hopefully you can realize that, and become mature. People are people, don't let it ruin your day if it isn't doing any serious harm to you that you cannot easily, with a click of a button, solve or prevent. You may choose to be offended, and you can definitely choose whether to let it ruin your day or not. 3: Well maybe he does understand it, but is looking at a different angle. For thousands of years the swastika had a totally different meaning than it is now, until one event very recently. There are several ways at looking at this. You might not agree, but engaging in rude, immature, and violent discussion with insults, isn't going to do anything. 4: Provided no argument, your opinion, his opinion. No need to be insulting. 5: And again with you with 2. If he was a loser wouldn't he have a job and definitely the money and a credit card to buy this game? 6: He broke no rules, his post is fine. 7: You yourself are very naive. Not everyone has the same perspective and way of thinking as you. IMHO this feature should be brought back, hope it gets fixed. I would like to see the ability to type it out and have a MS paint style drawing tool.

They aren't idiots, they are ignorant. Big difference. If they were idiots they cannot change. Haven't you done something similar, or revolting as them during your childhood? I know I did, and I know many others did. But people grow up, some sllwer than others. The people who grow up slower are retarded in terms of developing maturity, but they aren't stupid.