SFRGaming

I believe you're thinking of APB: Reloaded. While it was very functional and easy to use, as well as giving you an advantage, it was very arcade-y.

Destroy-able structures have always been here and have been here since ARMA II. And if you would have done just a tad bit of research, you would have saw that Dean stated he will add in throwing weapons bows, etc when the physics engine gets revamped. The physics we have now are slightly less than average, and adding throwing weapons, bows, etc now would mean they would perform poorly and look stupid.

Use the search function and you'll see that I (and several others) have stated the ARMA engines (this includes the Take on Helicopters engine that SA uses) are optimized for Intel/Nvidia products.

Guessing that you're referring to the M4A1 and the FNX, following up to the war that broke out in Chernarus (ARMA II campaign), there would be M4A1's due to the US Marine deployment. And the FNX is a handgun used world wide in various military and police forces.

Running an hour long livestream. Come join us!. http://www.twitch.tv/sfrgaming

The first vehicle will be added within the next 6 months.

Will start streaming in a few more minutes. Taking a quick break.

In approximately 5 minutes, I will be streaming some DayZ Standalone gameplay @ NWAF on a moderate - to - high population server. Come join us and drop us a sub! :) http://www.twitch.tv/sfrgaming

The weapon sling has been a highly suggested item and as we already know, the pistol holster is in the game. My suggestion is, if your primary has a weapon sling, and you have your pistol in a holster, you can bind a key for a quick switch between primary and secondary. In a sense, this can get rid of the some the primary-to-secondary clunkiness.

AK-47 would be a bad decision IMO. With all of its barrel shudder, loose fit parts, and close distance between both front and rear sights, it would just be a terrible pick over the AKM, which is miles ahead in tech and performance.

I don't know if you are being sarcastic or...? If you want to get technical with it, the AK-47 was easier to field strip, but suffered greatly with inaccuracy due to barrel shaking/shudder, loose fit parts, and the front and rear postal sights being so close. AK-47 is a beautiful rifle, but I wouldn't let my life rely on one.

What's the deal with all these people dogging the M4? IRL, the rifle is one of the best in the world, which is why a large selection of countries use it for either their own or use it as a base to manufacture their own weapons. Just because the weapons parameters are wrong in a game, doesn't mean it's shit IRL. I have an AR-15 (civilian version of the M4) and I have hit targets up to 500m scoped in. It isn't a shit rifle and saying it's shit because it's American won't get you far in any debate situation. And don't assume I hate all guns except for American made arms, because I personally love the G3. I have no problem with other countries and their arms because honestly, weapons are pretty high quality when made from the world's superpower countries. I personally have no respect for anyone to resort to saying something is bad or terrible just due to the country it's made in. This whole "Everything made in America is stupid and worthless just because it's American." is getting really old.

No, because in 2 years, the game will be in full release. And that's not what he's asking. He's suggesting a form of base building, not asking when it's coming out.

Put a shirt on

I am currently livestreaming DayZ Standalone. Come help my new page out and hangout with us. Drop a sub if you like the footage! :D Channel: http://www.twitch.tv/sfrgaming

Currently, the game wouldn't be able to support double-rendering without bringing down performance to a major degree. I imagine in the next few months, with the optimizations and graphic engine revamp, we might be able to see this.

Tried re-installing, defrag, verifying cache, running as admin, etc... Game still stops working a few seconds after start up. Any suggestions on what this might be?

It was literally a pain to read your suggestion since it had a terrible way of acting like you were talking to an audience and they were talking back. Try to be a bit more concise with your suggestions.

Let me go ahead and say I'd rather have tourist maps in pieces, since it would be more realistic that way. Topographic maps are huge and wouldn't be in 4 pieces for 1 select area. In my map reading class, our topographic maps are HUGE and cover the same (if not more) area as Chernarus.

Good ideas but stereotyping wont get you far in this forum.

No.

You forget that DayZ takes place in a small country with nothing but farms and fields.

How about you learn to be more respectful towards others?

I realize this, I was applauding Dean for keeping it the way it was in ARMA.

I'd rather any other AK model than the one from 1947. AKM, AK74, etc are miles ahead of the 1947 model and it would be a shame if Dean didn't add the newer models. And while I do agree with adding certain attachments for the AK models, I can only see it expanding with the need of an aftermarket rail system.