CrossShade

Again, just because you didn't explicitly see someone hacking doesn't mean they weren't, nuking people are not the only hacks. You could have died due to label hacks, teleporting near you etc.

What server was this on?

Just gonna say that because a player doesn't see explicitly obvious hacks doesn't mean they aren't there.

Actually they do, zoom in and hit N.

The endgame content should obviously be relative to each individual playstyle and objectives each player holds, surviving in itself is an objective, there could be endgame content for that also. People will always rush to attack or defend that which in itself is irrational. People just want to hate for the sake of hating on forums now.

Then stop hosting, obviously the rules are not going to change so why not get rid of the discontent you feel and continue playing on other servers with no feeling of negativity towards a simple $35 a month.

Usually it was close to 100% but strangely this last week I've had over 20 murders consecutively without a dc. Then 3 dc'd consecutively then another streak of consecutive non dc'ers. They seem to come in waves for me.

Had to upload it to a site were the picture takes around 20 seconds to fully resolve huh?

I also knew one of you would come here, knowing exactly how a situation would play out with no source material or experience. Keep trying to dictate the situation in your favour without considering other peoples opinions/evidence. It looks really nice to back your argument.

OP, not only is that extremely fishy as to the authenticity of the video, you state things like this etc, when this is the only heard example of this actually happening with a source. You're providing an inversely proportional source to the actual happenings and trying to prove a point with it. A terrible method to go in with.

1: Can you hold a gun properly? Yet alone shoot it? Yes, already have done. 2: Are you really that cold blooded? I'm pretty cold in real life already, signing up to be a marine soon too, so killing someone for my own survival would be pretty natural, albeit there would be some alterations, but after a while my brain would become hardened to it. 3: What purpose do you have to shoot on sight? Supplies, weapons, ensure that their are less people around my area, safety of myself+my group. People may have a vehicle I want, killing them prevents them defending said vehicle, which could lead to my death. 4: What things would prevent you from killing someone on sight? Usefulness, if someone showed they are skilled in a specific way, indoctrinating them to my group would be a plausible calculated choice, also women, sex and procreation (or at least the illusion of it) would be a huge help to group morale, it would give them a reason to keep fighting if they lose their will to live. Another reason not to kill somebody would be due to if they were in a small group, two things could arise from this, they could either be part of a larger group who is possibly nearby, or even organised and split into cells around the area, or I could follow them back to their camp and have a treasure trove to be attacked for supplies.

1) If you are going to post something that 'sounds' informative, and seems to have a paraphrased version of the Devs words... then supply some information to backup what you said they said. 2) Making tents attached to characters is idiotic. 1) You can just use the search function, takes like 5 second bro. 2)If you're going to post something that 'sounds' subjective, at least give us the reasoning as to why.

Instant respawns are ignored' date=' as are instant spawn kills. Most people would thank me for correcting them instead of calling me a moron. It's cool, though. Carry on. [/quote'] As much as I hate this guy and he's a hypocrite at points, even stating wrong information, he's completely correct in this situation, insulting him just lead to you looking like a bigger fool than if you had done it in a civil manner.