Pyro_Marine

Oh goodie! I get to do this one in reverse! I do read them. How else would I reply? 4. But you keep on coming back? 3. And how is that? You're the one who can't seem to comprehend that you brought up something about me that you apparently know without having met or spoken to me before this thread. 2. How so? Did I not propose point to everything? Hence the bullet format? What else would you like me to do? Hide them well enough and numbers do not matter. 1. I have no idea, yet you forget the topics your brought up? "And the last one" - you just copied your quote that I replied to already. You totally ignored my point on WHY they may do it, thus making anything you say irrelevant. Proposed a solution....you make it sound as if they were getting stolen, they were not. They were blowing up due to damage on this crap game engine. (This reverse answering is quite enjoyable) 3. I even said "If you're not, then good on you" - apparently you can not read. 2. According to his original post, he would have just ended up with even fewer than he has now due to the damage from driving them. Of course if you HAVE more you risk losing more. Basic gambling. The good thing? If you have more it is OK to lose more because there is...well...more you have left. 1. He lost them because of damage FFS. Did you even READ the OP? Or is the title all you glanced at before you decided you were king of the thread? (Oh this is so much fun!) Wait wait wait....you say that I am incapable of debate but you sit here and call me a "shit head"? Are you serious? Honestly, do you not see the blatant hypocrisy in what you're doing? You have proven that you are indeed a hypocrite here fighting out of pride and anger rather than thought. It nullifies anything you type after this, however; I will reply for the enjoyment I'm getting out of seeing you try to climb out of this massive pit you've dug for yourself. I didn't make it up. I minored in Psychology. Seeing through your words is simple. Want to know how it's proven? Your tone. Your entire tone changed after I pointed that out. Why? Because it hit a nerve. It hit that nerve and tickled that thought I mentioned. I brought it up and you immediately begin with the swears and name calling. I made one gesture about you being unarmed in this battle and you go ballistic. So, please - do continue to prove me correct. Oh and you have taken a course? Seeing through your text is rather easy. I bet as a person you are even easier to see through. Where did you take your classes? Mine was Georgia Southern University. I attended 2008 to 2011, deployed and have picked up at another school closer to home. Easier to hide? Four or ten? They are all equally easy, just one is more time consuming. There is nothing different between hiding one jeep or hiding a thousand. They all hide the same way. It just takes longer to hide them. It's like asking what weighs more: A ton of feathers or a ton of bricks. I can hide ten jeeps just as easily as I can hide one, it will just take more time to make sure they are all concealed. I mean, we are talking about jeeps that are the same length, width, height and color right? That would mean that since they are no different that they are no more difficult to hide. (Oh this is fun. I get to toy with you by braking it down so simple that it merely pisses you off because you're thinking of hiding them in one solid bunch instead of spacing them out in trees.) One can not prove jealousy over the internet via text. You are asking the impossible. That shows your ignorance. Well, we could also mention that most of the people who display envy on these forums also do so by telling others to NOT do what the original person (let's say you) wants to achieve. Say little Jimmy wants a camp, someone mentions setting one up; Jimmy will tell him not to do it. It's human nature. (This is a blast, I can't wait to see what other ways you use to try and push this off on me! :D ) So, judging by the normal actions of users on this forum, I have the ability to place you in that profile. Again - I'm the one calling names, but I see NOWHERE (please quote it) that I once called you a name like "Moron" and "Shit head" - BOTH of which YOU used. I made a remark about you being unarmed in a battle of wits (This seems awfully familiar, but it would seem as if the only way for you to understand something is....repetition repetition repetition repetition), which you apparently took soooo much offense to that you sunk to name calling (a sign of an inner loss for true return fire in a debate. I'm actually waiting for you to call me a faggot and prove you're on the same level as your average internet user.) Less vehicles makes losses easier....Tell that to the Confederacy when it came to losing troops when they had less than the Union. When your numbers (of anything) are lower, each loss is that much worse. Would they have lost an overall number less? Yes. Would it have been a larger hurt? Yes. Why can't you understand that? (This reverse thing isn't quite as fun anymore. Too much scrolling.) Irrelevant? But sir, did you not say that I would disagree with EVERYONE who differed in opinion? Did you not bring that up? That makes it relevant. YOU bringing up my ability to see the other side of an argument was what is irrelevant. I'm just bringing up what you posted, replying to it and then you are simply trying to ignore what you brought up. You are blind to your own mistakes which leads me to believe you will probably never rise to the top of something worth mentioning. Is this a low blow? No, merely an observation based on your ability to reply, ignore what you said and then accuse me of irrelevant items when it was you who brought them up in the first place. "You must have forgotten the issue at hand: the OP has lost his vehicles. He whined about it." *sigh* He did not whine. He mentioned how easy they are to destroy and even said Thank You at the end of his post. That is not a whine. THIS is a whine: MOTHER FUCKING VEHICLES ARE TOO FUCKING EASY TO BLOW UP! THIS SHIT IS FUCKING STUPID! THEY SHOULDN'T BREAK SO EASILY! THIS IS BULLSHIT! Unless you attach the words in metal form and on the end of a drill, you can't literally drill them into my head can you? (It's apparent you are unable to admit you are wrong, so sarcasm must take place in order for me [and any others who may read this] to keep my sanity.) And it was a reiteration. SMH. --- Oh this was rather enjoyable. I do hope you'll respond again (I'd bet my house on it), and this time, could you ignore the fact that you brought up my inability to handle people who had a different opinion than me? Oh! Oh! Let me quote it so it's even more amusing when you ignore it. :D

http://www.bbb.org/connecticut/business-reviews/internet-gaming/defcon-networks-in-willimantic-ct-87015617

That...was painful. No beans for you.

No, I will not shoot you unless you fire first.

*sigh* here we go. DayZ nerd talk. Let's begin the list. I'll go bullet format to simplify this. *I mentioned towards the end of my last post that it's a pretty safe bet by your comment that you're jealous of his fleet. If you're not, then good on you. *Effort is wasted: It's wasted every time you get killed or thunder domed. You still play right? What's not fun for you may be fun for him. *I told you that you were wrong in your assumption of my attitude. To have never met me, you know something about me other than my screen name? *I mentioned his camp may have been compromised which is why they may have moved them, or they just like the simplicity. I've seen some pretty kick ass "garages" where they used sand bags as parking spaces. It's like building your own vehicle fort. It also helps if you take a vehicle down to a major city and it gets destroyed, you can just pick another, OR you could even host your own demolition derby (done it). *I brought up the history because you said - proving that I do in fact like to hold conversations with people who see things in a different light than myself and with that, proved you incorrect (or wrong if you will).*"Bring up something that doesn't matter" - you brought up me not agreeing with anyone who has a different opinion, therefore; YOU brought it up. At this point, I would recommend you read back what YOU said, and then what I said....or just quit while you're...well while you're not entirely left behind, though I do believe you will continue to argue for the sake of pride. A person who can not admit their own fault because of pride is a fool. * Hide the vehicles well enough and it doesn't matter how many you have. You're casting doubt on his groups ability to hide them without any knowledge of HOW they hide them. I didn't pass judgement on them because I do not know them or how they operate.Just because you can not seem to conceal a vehicle does not mean you can come to the conclusion it is impossible to make it nearly invisible.* You're responding because you have a small thought in the back of your mind that you may be wrong and are looking for me to confirm you are correct. That will not happen here. Sorry to break it to you so harshly.* I do believe it concerns me. Anything that goes on in this forum has the ability to be the concern of every player/tester/poster/developer/administrator/moderator as they see fit because it is mentioned in their community (the DayZ community) and as an avid user of this forum, I take everything mentioned on the forum and apply it. I do not know what you apply because forethought is obviously not on that list. * This statement alone shows your own doubt in your idea and ability to deal with what seems to be more than just your average internet Joe. Psychology 101. You're trying to show a false sense of victory from an unfinished battle that actually has the inner meaning of "For the love of God I hope this is the end. With this, I might be able to demean him into submission."*When you replied after me I was hoping for a battle of wits, BUT you've apparently come unarmed. Would you like me to stop here, or are you going to prove me correct that you let your pride run you and dictate your actions?

Yeah, it's easier to just swing by a big city, do a quick "Get in, get out" mission and head up.

My solution was more of a solution to your being upset at his success, which is obvious when you tell him to not hoard vehicles. You are very wrong. I spend a lot of time doing debates (some of which have opened my eyes on certain topics). One vehicle is easier to sweep away than ten, granted you are more than likely talking about keeping them all grouped up, which is still his decision. He may have been moving them due to them being compromised. Our camp was compromised and we had to relocate all of our vehicles, granted there were two hidden in another location. Due to the fact most people complain about vehicles being hard to find and then bashing those that hoard them (My group used to keep five around the clock), it was a safe bet to assume you were pissed off at him. ;)

Problem: Vehicles in the game get destroyed too easy and it has been mentioned by, Rocket. All we can do is wait. Solution: You stop being so jealous you can't find a vehicle. (Solution for your poor solution.) I don't even know this guy, but I'm not going to be a whiny bitch about his success.

It was on the final DayZ myth buster episode.

IIRC it does give you a slight benefit. The hero skin makes you faster Bandit makes you slower but aim is better and I THINK it improves bullet resistance. Not sure.

I think they can make a smaller map for people who want to play it like it's CoD and just shoot everyone walking around. :o That's right, that game can be played both ways. I go into highly populated areas because I find raiding small towns not very fun. The close encounters causes one's heart to race. It's forcing yourself to not shoot someone when they're close by that's hard. Killing them is easy. ;)

Too bad the first bullet is normally enough to be more than fatal.

maddog4u31757 is my steam Going to be a bit thought since my gaming PC died

Awesome video - Diggin' the outro as well. I'd play with you but 1. My gaming PC died this week 2. I'm East Coast USA :/

I beg to differ. I find SURVIVING harder than being a bandit. Why? Bandit: See someone - shoot, kill, check gear and leave Survivor: Keep character alive, avoid players, raid towns and medical areas, avoid being seen Hero: Help others, hope they don't shoot you and be prepared if they begin to open fire or you're ambushed.

Oh wow it's close. 70, 67, 66

Go to 1:12 and just watch.... xD

You were probably being naughty AND You need to go to the BattleEye forums.

Well? >.>

I play it as if I were actually in the scenario still :(

Survivor. Why would I want an outfit that makes me stick out so bad? The speed is not a good enough trade off for me to get that bright ass, ugly shirt. I'll stick to surviving, my ghillie and helping people if such need arises.

roflmfao! "FUCK LOGIIIIIIC!"

You could always make it so that if someone snipes/kills a medic, it puts out the grid coordinates for say, 5 seconds. You could say it's the medic doing an all-call on the radio before he dies or something. Would deter a few, would give the bandits people to kill as they showed up and would get groups to go on man hunts. I'd personally love to be a medic.

Moon phases are implemented in the game.

There was a hacker like that the other day that helped my friend (I was offline, computer kept crashing). It was pretty funny to hear him tell the story.