Pyro_Marine

I just see it giving shitty players another reason to dupe. :/

When "Winner" popped up and the song started, I lost it. xD

Shoot them in the legs, drag them. Ta da! :P

"This video is unavailable" :(

Meh, he could have just said he wasn't jealous. His tone changed, so I got hostile. (:< lol I don't have any vehicles right now, but I'm always the duck in the cross hair. :( lol

Hehe, people are gonna shoot at ya anyways. :P I profiled him as your average DayZ survivor for kicks. He sure got his feathers ruffled. Wasn't whining about the damge, merely saying they get damaged very easily and it's a pain. Someone pointing out a fault isn't a whine. Look a few posts back for something in all caps that looks like it was written by a twelve year old. That's an example of a whine. :P :P I don't hoard vics myself, but I'm not gonna get upset if someone does. Gives me something to hunt. Thanks. I got it off a tree. Fuck yeah! He ate my soul :(

Sticking to low pop servers and had a friend. We had a hacker show up, killed him and I got away. Another friend, we were playing (him and I had literally just met up after an hour of running) and suddenly we were teleported. I escaped, and aborted. Logged in another server and told him (and the other folks) where their gear was. It's my lucky can of Mt. Dew.

I'd epi pen you if my computer wasn't broken. It wouldn't take long for someone to run to a hospital and grab an epi pen for you. :/

As long as you're not driving directly towards or away from them lol xD

Yeah. Give it 48 hours and it'll be just as bad (duped items anyway). I don't know how to dupe, nor do I care to know how; but I don't see the point. It kills the fun in it. --- The only thing that would make me sad is my character that's on day 46 of survival. :P

"Hey guyssesesszzzz! I can snipe but YOU can't snipe so I can snipe OK!?!!!!!?!?!1111//1?!?!?1/!?" Fuck off and get cancer.

The idea still stands. If he had less, the losses would have been more severe. He more than likely would have ended up with zero. I'm using one to counter yours. Problem? Because your point is invalid. You are trying to argue having less equals less damage (when it does literally) and that he would have been better off. I don't know about you but two > one. You even said in your post that if we kept it proportional, he would have only one left vs two. Again two > one. Yet you called me a "shit head" and a "moron". Hypocrisy? Check. I never said it had anything to do with psychology, but that it is easier to profile you with the other players. Then why argue with me? You're trying to solicit particular parts of an argument and use them as lead points instead of answering to the entire thing. That's why the term was used. Yet you continue to bring them up. You bring up irrelevant items over and over. Again, you can do this but I can not? Hypocrisy? Check. No, I just do not see the need to use words that will do nothing more than extend the debate. That's the problem with the English language. There is normally more than one word for each meaning. The amount of false intellect lead me to believe you want to sound intelligent. I have no need to SOUND intelligent when I've proven your point is invalid. Would you prefer I swapped my preferred choice in words to something more complex? It's like using the word feces on a zombie forum instead of the word shit. Should you require to feed your need of false intellect, there are plenty of forums where you may type all of the fancy words you want. This forum is not one of them. ---- And again, "fuck", "shit" - I may USE these words, but who was the first one to call names? That's right. You were. Because I was a moron and a shit head....yet I'm lacking in vocabulary? Please entertain me some more. I do hope your brain doesn't burst into flames searching for more words to toss around in the hopes of trying to prove your insane idea correct. ---- Could someone pass ME the popcorn? This is rather entertaining and I'd like a snack while I wait.

1. Look at it this way. You have two units. One with 100 men, and one with 1,000 men. You send them both on separate charges. 100 man crew loses 57 people, 1,000 man crew loses 184. Which one lose more? The one with 1,000. Who suffered worse losses as a unit? The 100 man unit. If you believe that searching for parts to vehicles is a "waste of time" then you shouldn't even be commenting on this thread. Why? Because you think searching for stuff is a waste of time, which is technically what makes this game fun. Searching for good loot right? When you play with friends, you could be scavenging for dog shit and it'd be fun if you're not a tight wad. 2. All you're simply saying is if he had less vehicles, less of them would have blown up. No shit? That doesn't mean the losses would have been less severe. He lost all but two because he had more to spare. What if he didn't have those extra two? He would have zero. Your point is null and void. 3.For fucks sake, did you...you know what, since you're too fucking blind to read what I wrote, you can bring this up all you want but I'm on topic. I already said if you're not jealous then good for fucking you. God damn. I'd like to call you retarded but then I'd be on your level since I'm a shit head and a moron. --- I can profile you based on the normal actions of regular players. --- Do you take me for an idiot? You throw out words like that when all you're pulling is a straw man argument. Fancy words do not equate to a victorious argument or debate. It just shows you have different forms of shit to throw onto my monitor that still lack solid proof of the success of your opinion.

Lol that was a terrible time to need a heat pack. Good show though! Big boom!

xD

Check out www.DigitalStorm.com

What movie is that from? It looks so familiar. O_o

lucky

F rating with the BBB is enough for me.

Yeah, I'd put a longer timer though just because even with five minutes, you can still get someone who is trying to make sure you were the only one in the area. Someone mentioned this idea before and put a time limit of an hour. I'd be fine with that. When I leave a server, I normally have no desire to go back into it.

Says the man who tried to end the debate before it started, and continues to tell me to be on topic after ignoring his own error. I bring it up because you brought mine up to begin with. 1. It would lead to a numerically "lower" loss, but in the end the cost would have been higher due to not having any to spare. 2. See number 1. If it's based on time spent gathering to lose = bad then this entire mod is utter shit. I have fun gathering supplies with friends. Even if the vic blows up or gets stolen. 3. Lol "Good on you" means good for you. ie If you aren't jealous then good for you, the subject can be dropped. FFS where in the hell are you from? Most players can be profiled, I provided to profile and you fit. You denied and I pretty much said "Well alright then." Jesus H. Christ on a merry-go-round.

Arguing with you is literally depressing me because of your inability to admit you brought up something and then want to ride my ass for what you did. Hoarding vehicles doesn't cause them to blow up. Crashing, bullets and rockets do.

Wait. You want me to keep on topic, yet you are trying to get beyond the fact that YOU were the one who brought up something personal and beyond the argument (which was proven to be entirely incorrect?). So you want ME to not bring anything off-topic up, but it's OK for you? 1. OP took losses because of the crap game engine design and faulty vehicle damage system, which HAS been addressed by ROCKET himself. 2. He wouldn't have lost as many, but the losses would have been worse due to having fewer to spare. 3. You are one dull piece of work. Let me get a quote to help open that cloud of smoke in your brain. There. Now you can't use that excuse anymore. It's funny. You first accused me of being off-topic, when you brought up something totally unrelated. You then accuse me of continuing to assume something (though I provided enough evidence to prove you fit the bill of your average DayZ player), even though the above, bolded statement makes your continuance on the topic moot. Ya know, if you want to be in a place where you can say what you want, and then say you didn't say (or ignore it entirely) and then place fault in the other person; you are more then welcome to become a politician.

I just wish there was a way that groups could put maybe a piece of colored cloth on their arm so people aren't always going "Is that you? Hey! Is that you running over by blah blah?" Nice find though. :)

xD Very nice. lol